What's wrong with you? It depends where you live
Jeremy Laurance looks at how different countries treat the same symptoms
Human beings may belong to the same species, but they experience sickness differently. Each nation has its favoured illnesses and its favoured explanations, which alter over time. A doctor in one country may label an illness as depression, while the identical symptoms may be labelled as low blood pressure in another, or as the effects of dental amalgam in yet another.
These cultural variations throw light on illnesses that are poorly defined but that impose a huge burden of suffering on individuals, and on the workload of doctors and hospitals, who can often do little to help.
It reminds us that while medicine in the modern world has achieved an extraordinary level of sophistication, there is still much it cannot do. We can create babies in a test tube, transplant organs and bring people back from the dead. We are beginning to grow new body parts from stem cells, to defeat diseases by genetic engineering and to help the blind see.
Yet 40 per cent of those attending GPs and hospital out patients departments never receive a conventional medical explanation for their symptoms. These are people who typically complain of headaches, fatigue, inability to concentrate, aches and pains, and feeling unwell. They are suffering from malaise, of unexplained origin, whose expression apparently depends on which country they live and how the culture responds to their condition. Are these different conditions? Or the same condition, just given different names?
Simon Wessely, professor of psychiatry at Kings College, London, who has studied cultural trends in illness, says: "People will always seek explanations when they feel under the weather or not quite right. Much of it depends on what is currently hot in medicine. Each age and each culture has its own answers. Doctors use many different labels to describe patients with unexplained symptoms – somatisation, burn-out, chronic fatigue syndrome, multiple chemical sensitivity, subclinical depression, post traumatic stress disorder, low blood pressure, spasmophilia – despite no evidence that any of these are distinct or separate entities. Our belief is that most of these labels refer to similar clinical problems."
The choice of label has profound implications for how patients deal with their symptoms and the treatment they expect from doctors. "Clearly someone who believes their symptoms are due to spasmophilia or low blood pressure will seek different treatments from someone who believes they have a food allergy or chemical sensitivity. Public health measures will also differ and the resulting controversy and political indecision can cause ill feeling, distrust and suspicion," Professor Wessely says.
Britain: bowels
In Britain, our obsession with our bowels extends back to the 19th century when a condition called intestinal auto-intoxication – self poisoning from one's own retained wastes – was widely diagnosed, especially in young women.
It was thought that the colon leaked toxic material into the bloodstream, which caused sufferers to feel tired, weak, depressed and wracked by unexplained aches and pains. Constipation was seen as "the disease of diseases" and the public became prey to marketers of anti-constipation remedies and, in extreme cases, surgery to remove a section of the colon was carried out.
Professor Wessely said: "The condition was always diagnosed in young women, surgeons took out their colons and quite a percentage died. You can see the legacy of it today in the fashion for colonic lavage and the interest in detox treatments. Surgeons no longer take out people's bowels and so they go for the detox option instead."
Germany: low blood pressure
Regarded as a sign of excellent health elsewhere, in Germany low blood pressure is seen as a disease responsible for weakness and fatigue and is treated with drugs to boost it. Chronic low blood pressure is said to cause tiredness, giddiness, black-outs, anxiety and sweating. It is known as "constitutional hypotension" in German medical textbooks, but the diagnosis is not well accepted elsewhere.
Britain and France: chronic fatigue and spasmophilia
French doctors do not recognise the condition known as ME (myalgic encephalitis) or Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS), which is widely known and frequently diagnosed in Britain. Often the condition is triggered by a viral illness, such as glandular fever. Most people get over it but some become trapped in monitoring their symptoms, restricting their activities beyond what is necessary and getting demoralised.
Professor Wessely, a specialist in the problem, said: "In Britain, people with chronic fatigue think that if they do too much the virus that caused it is still there and will come back and make them worse. That is catastrophising the illness. They don't think like that in France and they don't have the same outcomes. It is how you respond to symptoms that determines the outcome."
He described how a French physician from Lyon who spent a sabbatical in the UK was astonished at the sight of children with chronic fatigue in wheelchairs at Great Ormond Street hospital. "He returned to Paris and wrote an article about how there was just no equivalent in France."
In place of chronic fatigue, the French suffer from spasmophilia – panic attacks characterised by hyperventilation, spasms and convulsions. Young women are again particularly vulnerable and, as with sufferers from chronic fatigue, often dissatisfied with their medical treatment. Spasmophilia is not recognised elsewhere.
Sweden: dental amalgam
In Sweden, the use of dental amalgam in "ordinary dental care" is to be banned from 1 June, and will be subject to a total ban from June 2012, because of the risks posed by mercury, which the Swedish Chemicals Agency describes as a "threat to human health and the environment". The use of dental amalgam has been linked with a range of afflictions including depression, tiredness and malaise and has fallen by 90 per cent since 1997. Tens of thousands of Swedes have had their amalgam fillings replaced with new materials.
In other countries, such as the UK and US, the use of amalgam fillings has not aroused public anxiety in the same way and few patients have had them removed. One US dentist was recently struck off the medical register for removing fillings from a patient. Cultural differences do not come wider than this: that a procedure regarded as normal in Sweden has led to a doctor losing his licence to practice in the US.
Germany and Sweden: electromagnetic radiation
The Swedes and the Germans also share a high level of concern over the harmful of effects of electromagnetic radiation – emitted by mobile phones, electricity pylons and domestic electrical equipment. Most studies of sensitivity to radiation from mobile phones are in German. There have been 46 to date but all have yielded negative findings. When people claiming to suffer electro-sensitivity were tested to see if they could detect the presence of a mobile phone switched to silent mode and hidden from view, they were, on average, unable to do so. (Only those studies that were not "blinded" – where the outcome was not hidden from the researchers – had positive results).
Professor Wessely says the issue was effectively settled. "This is one of the few instances where the UK Department of Health has published a report saying less research is needed." But still, concern about the effects persists in Germany and Sweden.
Britain and France: vaccination
In many countries, there are fears about vaccination – but the vaccines that are the targets differ. In Britain, the suspected link between MMR vaccine and autism has never been proved but has dominated debate for a decade. In most other countries MMR has aroused no concern. The exception is Japan, where the MMR vaccine was withdrawn in 1993 because of concerns about adverse reactions to the mumps component (which is different in the UK vaccine). There have been regular measles outbreaks and deaths in Japan. In France, British concerns about MMR have been ignored, but worries about Hepatitis B vaccine and a supposed link with multiple sclerosis have taken their place.
Eastern Europe: neurasthenia
Neurasthenia, or "exhaustion of the central nervous system", is a diagnosis not used in Britain for a century. It collapsed when neurologists gave up trying to find a physiological explanation for the typical symptoms of sufferers – fatigue, headaches and sleep disturbance – and passed the patients on to psychiatrists, who diagnosed depression and anxiety. But neurasthenia still survives and is widely applied to describe the same symptoms in eastern Europe, Russia, China and Japan. Chinese-Americans living in the US are especially prone, but Americans of other races are not.
Nova Scotia, Canada: perfume
One of the most bizarre national obsessions is the concern about perfume in Nova Scotia. Deodorants, herbal shampoos, perfumes and other scented products are subject to a voluntary ban in most indoor public places including local government offices, libraries, hospitals, classrooms, courts, and on public transport.
The fear is that scented products can trigger asthma attacks and lead to the development of multiple chemical sensitivity. A similar ban has been considered in Ottawa, the capital, and a voluntary ban has been introduced in Marin county, California, in the US.
Brigham and Women's hospital in Boston, US, discourages staff and patients from wearing scent and Shutesbury public library in the city offers a couple of hours' fragrance-free book browsing each week.
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited




Comments
Suzy Chapman
ME/CFS there seems to be an insistence by Kings College London it is psychological in talking to the media always omits to inform it is classified as neurological not psychological by the World Health Authority (WHO).
The US Gulf War reports finds, it is the result of neurotoxic exposures during Gulf War deployment, and that few veterans have recovered or substantially improved with time. These are freely available to download online.
Even the NHS acknowledge that 68 % of 6m people with asthma and allergies (that they are aware of) were sensitive to perfumes and other chemicals. The terpenes of essential oils, in particular high emission of linalool, eucalyptol, D-limonene, r-cymene and terpinene-4-ol-l contributed to increasing indoor secondary pollutants such as formaldehyde (a carcinogen) and secondary aerosols in the presence of ozone. (Su et al 2006) and further acknowledge other research that exposure to fragrance and essential oils from the air has also induced or worsened respiratory problems including decrease of pulmonary function and increase of chest tightness, wheezing and exacerbates asthma. International work on indoor pollutants found these to be was much higher than outside the home, products are still freely markets despite this.
Psychology is smoke screen tactics blame the individual, takes the onus off government, industry and advertising regarding carcinogens, mutagenic, sensitisers in the form of hydrogenised fats, colourings, additives and preserves, leeching plastics, pesticides and scent technology that we eat, inhale and wear; then there is air pollution - transport pollution exceeds EU inadequate guidelines especially the way towns and cities are built and congested gridlocked house lined roads etc; the underlying toxic basis for ailments or genetic consequences - research is finding affects second generations worse than the original exposed generation.
The casualties of the psycho-profession across centuries is untold, turrets, just a few decades ago asthma, allergy, tourettes etc were classified as neurotic and attention seeking, single were mothers insane and sectioned, electroshock treatment for depression the list goes on. An interesting read on the behaviour of the psychology profession is Malcolm Hoopers Corporate
Do we need more actual science medical research YES ! more psychology NO !
And yes, once again, Professor Wessely disregards WHO ICD-10 taxonomy, using the terms "chronic fatigue", "ME" and "Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS)", interchangeably, as though all three were indexed in the same Chapter of ICD-10, which they are not.
Only recently, the WHO Collaborating Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, was obliged to correct the website for the WHO Guide to Mental and Neurological Health in Primary Care where they had incorrectly placed "chronic fatigue" at G93.3. This website has now been amended to read "chronic fatigue G48.0" - which is still incorrect; it should read F48.0 (which is in Chapter V).
It has sat like this for weeks. Would someone from the WHO Collaborating Centre or the Institute of Psychiatry or perhaps, Professor Wessely, himself, if he is reading these comments, please attend to this error?
Have a look at it here:
http://www.mentalneurologicalprimarycar
There is a very long history of false psychogenic attribution in medicine. Multiple Sclerosis, a neurological disease, was once ascribed to "hysteria" in a way not dissimilar to how MCS is dismissed in your article. Parkinson's Disease, Asthma and Peptic Ulcers too were once dismissed as psychogenic (the demonstration of the infectious aetiology of peptic ulcers earned a Nobel Prize).
What you have written here does no service to the body of scientific evidence that exists. Where are your Professors of Biochemistry, Immunology, Genetics and Physiology? Nowhere. Arguably the most important works published on MCS in recent times are the three large refereed papers by Haley et al (1999), Mckeown-Eyssen et al (2004) and Scnakenberg et al (2007) which together show that 5 genes have statistically significant roles in determining susceptibility to MCS, this is further supported by two studies by Mackness et al (2000,2003). These studies come from Institutions as far afield as United States of America, Canada, Germany and Britain, falsifying your psycho-geographic confectionery.
Your piece on fragrances is breathtaking and completely misunderstands the increasing problem fragrances are posing populations around the world. Well over 3000 different chemicals are used in fragrances. Chemicals that are known to act on the Central Nervous System, others scientifically implicated in Kidney damage and known carcinogens (such as Methylene Chloride) are still found in fragrances. Less than 20% of the chemicals used in fragrances have been tested for human toxicity. Fragrances do trigger asthma and affect those with MCS. It is a real problem for asthmatics and those with MCS to go to hospital where they are exposed to fragranced people and cleaning agents. I applaud efforts to improve the air quality in hospitals and public places by reducing the concentration and sources of fragrances.
Interestingly during May, Melbourne (Australia) is having what is billed as its "First Fragrance Free" Seminar for Chemical Sensitivity Week. It features leading Melbourne lights in Medical, Legal and Architectural fields discussing Chemical Sensitivities, the controversies and the way forward to better knowledge.
You would do us all a favour if you read up a bit on what your are writing about. A very good place to start would be Steinemann AC. 'Fragranced consumer products and undisclosed ingredients'. Environ Impact Asses Rev (2008). In this study Professor Steinemann found hundreds of unlabelled toxic and carcinogenic chemicals in 6 common laundry products and air fresheners. These products emitted some substances listed on the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) list for chemicals with no safe exposure. I don't know about you, but I really see no advantage to me in breathing such chemicals.
As for ME, there are thousands of papers that show it is a biological illness.
I am hoping that one day when they find out what is causing this condition which wrecks lives, that people like you will say " bloody hell they were ill ".
Most patients are forgotten as there is no treatment but most patients live there lives without contacting their G.P.
YOU HAVE WRITTEN "MOST PEOPLE GET OVER IT BUT SOME BECOME TRAPPED IN MONITORING THEIR SYMPTONS". I THINK NOT!
This illness wrecks lives. You wouldn't say to a patient with a brain tumour that they were "CATASTROPHISING " their illness.
Karen Hall wife, mum and M.E. sufferer for 10 years.
http://www.sophiaandme.org.uk/
She had been so severely affected she lived her life, as many with M.E. do, lying in a darkened room. She was sectioned under the mental health act by doctors who thought she was pretending to be ill. She was admitted to a locked room of a locked mental ward, where her mother reports she was denied basic nursing care. As a result of this mistreatment she died a short while later. Her mother writes:
"We requested an independent neuropathologist to research Sophia's spine. The findings confirmed that it contained massive infection. At the inquest the Coroner confirmed that "She died as a result of acute renal failure arising from the effects of chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS)"/ M.E."
Her story has never reached the national media, and the doctors and social workers responsible for admitting a profoundly physically ill patient to a mental ward have never been disciplined.
Sophie is not the only person to have died of M.E.; there have been a number of deaths. Casey Fero died aged 23 in 2005; he had been ill with M.E. since the age of 9. There were no doctors who ?believed in? the disease or, for that matter, really believed Casey was sick. The pathologist found that:
"Casey died of myocarditis that is, his heart was infected with disease. There was inflammation, and the tissue was full of viral infection. Casey also had old fibrosis, indicating that the viral infection was not of a new onset."
The pathologist was ?shocked? at this finding.
http://www.investinme.org/Article%2
The pathogens that cause M.E. affect the heart. These pathogens include Human Herpes 6A, Cryptostrongylus Pulmoni, Parvovirus B19, Epstein Barr, Lyme disease, etc. Most M.E. sufferers never recover because they do not receive the biomedical treatment they need. A quarter are house or bed bound & premature death occurs by an average of 25 years.
Instead of identifying and treating the pathogens involved, all research funding by the Medical research Council has gone to psychiatrists like Prof Wessely who believe M.E. is merely an 'abnormal illness belief' (it has been classified as a neurological illness by the World Health Organisation since 1969). Because of this lack of biomedical research there is no effective treatment . The graded exercise and cognitive behaviour 'therapies' that M.E. patients are offered (in clinics designed not for them, but for patients with the mental disorder Chronic Fatigue) are at best useless and at worst harmful.
M.E. Awareness Week is 5th - 11th May. It is to be hoped that this date will signal an end to the psychiatric profession's stranglehold on this debilitating physical illness. Is a doctor who can say of a group of patients '?The average doctor will see they are neurotic and he will often be disgusted with them? as Prof Wessely is reported to have said of M.E. patients, the best person to be treating them?
WORLD HEALTH ORGANISATION (W.H.O.) DEFINITION OF M.E. since 1969:
"ME/CFS is an acquired organic, pathophysiological, multi-systemic illness that
occurs in both sporadic and epidemic forms. Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ICD 10
G93.3), which includes CFS, is classified as a neurological disease in the World
Health Organization's International Classification of Diseases (ICD). Chronic
fatigue must not be confused with ME/CFS because the "fatigue" of ME/CFS
represents pathophysiological exhaustion and is only one of many symptoms.
Compelling research evidence of physiological and biochemical abnormalities
identifies ME/CFS as a distinct, biological clinical disorder."
Many of the "unexplained" medical symptoms are caused from direct and prolongued exposures to these substances, and not from people creating stories that they want or should be sick and miss out on all the fun they used to be able to have before some form of toxic trespass injured them.
If people were able to so profoundly affect their health by just believing they are sick, the opposit should be true too, that we should be able to cure ourselves just by believing we are well.
If this were true, why do we have any need for hospitals and pharmaceutical companies?
Simon Wessely is very selective usage of historical sources. He fails to point out where psychiatrists got it wrong in the past using similar ideas. Basically ?Oh it?s those sorts of people again? or ?Well that type would think that.? MS, Parkinson?s, Bleeding Stomach Ulcers, etc, etc, etc. The danger of ?Evidence Based? psychiatry is that you might end up with phrenology or neo Darwinism. A great many illnesses caused fatigue. The symptom in his synonym ME/CFS is ?Fatigue.? However in the construct ME, Myalgic Encephalomyelitis, the symptom is ?Chronic Muscle Fatigability?. And that is only one symptom of a great many. Perhaps in not recognizing that fact, and the other symptoms, may be the true ?catastrophing? force in the whole sorry affair.
We all know that there are people who are concerned over trifles, but randomizing them into statistical studies of populations with very ill people, serves nobody.
I also think I?m correct in saying that ?Neurasthenia? was a word used in Victorian times by neurologists for a physical illness they had clinically observed in influenza victims. Might this be another example of psychiatrists borrowing an existing word for a new concept? It?s a habit that causes great confusion. We do not refer to Downs Syndrome Children as Mongoloid Children, because the concepts are different. Why does Simon insist on calling Myalgic Encephalomyelitis, ?Chronic Fatigue Syndrome??
As others have said, one would think there wasn't a single piece of biomedical evidence for ME/CFS or for Gulf War Syndrome, Multiple Chemical Sensitivities or Amalgam poisoning, when in fact there is plenty of evidence, including in peer-reviewed journals. Prof Wessely prefers to ignore these and indeed has built his entire career on denying the reality of cripplingly disabling illnesses. One wonders why his opinions are presented as undisputed 'facts' in this article, when they are actually highly contested.
There are many people struggling to get treatment and diagnosis of the condition that i have: Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome because doctors are so dismissive of low blood pressure as a sign that something is wrong. I know that if my heart is beating up to 150 beats per minute and i cannot stand/walk for more that a few seconds, my body temperature is sky high and i am sweating and breathless and about to pass out when all i did was get out of bed, that something is actually wrong, and should not be dismissed as "your blood pressure is a bit low but nothing to worry about" as my doctor said. POTS is a form of dysautonomia and is recognised in many countries, including the US.
I also have ME/CFS and i have never restricted my activities due to a belief that i still had a virus. In fact i kept going to work far too long after i became ill (months and months) until i could not drag myself there any longer as i listened to the likes of Wessley when doctors told me there was nothing wrong with me, that it was a physical form of depression (i wasn't depressed - life was great at the time i got ill) and to basically pull myself together. I believe i would not have become so chronically, severely, ill and disabled if someone had actually said "rest, listen to your body and make sure you recover from that nasty virus before pushing on with work". I lost my job, my independance, had to leave the city i had made my home and move back in with my mum. It was devastating. My sister got ME aged 11 and was a fearless child, who lived life to the full (as they do) and if she felt better from a virus she would not have worried about it, she would have been living her life!
The fact that there are different cultural interpretations of similar illnesses shows that they are poorly understood and explained by medical science, not that they are not real and debilitating.
When will this simple and obvious truth be accepted and the focus turn to finding the answers not onto casting doubt on people who are doing their best to cope with ill-health with little support or treatment or recognition. The things Wessley has said make me so angry and i wonder who has "false beliefs" about these illnesses? He certainly has little evidence to back up his claims and insults, but must know some powerful people to still have his job at this point... how can he ignore so much medical evidence that is contrary to his claims? His attitudes are physically, financially and emotionally damaging to people with ME/CFS: They are perpetuating dismissive and suspicious attitudes amongst health professionals, health insurance companies and employers.
The Independent would be acting like proper journalists if they investigated whether it is appropriate for psychiatrists like Simon Wesseley to act as Government advisors on illnesses like ME/CFS while working as consultants for the medical insurance industry. The insurance industry have an interest in classifying such illneses as psychiatric conditions (despite the WHO classification of ME as a neurological condition) since they have to pay out on far fewer policies.
Is the Independent aware that no Biomedical research on ME/CFS has been funded by the Medical Research Council in the last 12 years? All projects have been funded by charity - even work by Dr Jonathan Kerr on gene expression which may lead to a diagnostic test. Between 2002 and 2008, at least thirty-three Biomedical research projects into ME/CFS were turned down by the Medical Research Council because psychiatrists like Simon Wesseley were among those deciding which projects were funded and turned down any which did not look at ME/CFS from a psycho-social approach.
While the suicide of Daniel James at Dignitas in Switzerland last year was front page headlines on many newspapers, none of them covered the story of Nicola McNougher. She suffered from serious ME/CFS and travelled to Switzerland to commit suicide in May 2008. In a statement Mrs McNougher prepared before she died, she stated she was 'living an inhuman existance' and that 'the blame should not rest with Dignitas, but that 'the focus should be on conducting proper medical research'.
She also left tissue to be used for such research. Articles such as the one by Jeremy Laurance and the thoughtless empire building by Simon Wesseley are examples of the problems which have hindered the understanding and treatment of ME/CFS in this country. Perhaps if Politicians, Psychiatrists and Journalists had listened to those with this illness more there would have been fewer tragedies like the two mentioned above.
When there are around 250,000 people in this country suffering from ME/CFS, it costs the country about 6 billion pounds per year and the amount spent by the Government to find a cure is next to nothing, that is what you call truly scandalous.
I suffer from ME - until I got it two years ago I was a very healthy , active, confident, successful person with no mental illness or history of mental illness or general malingering etc.
This disease is real and many suffer from it. This man is awful and someone should really make him listen to that not unknown body the WHO - they class the disease as neurological not psychological - is he calling them liars?
Dr Simon Wessely is well known to the international ME/CFS/MCS community. The promotion of his unproven and inaccurate psychological theories have for many years caused immense suffering and prevented proper scientific investigations and medical managment of this very serious and growing public health issue. The media has also been guilty of tagging along on this psychobabble band wagon without adequately investigating the facts.
People with ME/CFS/MCS face immense discrimination in society and are often denied access to even the most basic services such as health care and housing due to the kind of general ignorance that is being promoted in this article. As pointed out by other commentators below the medical neglect facing people with ME/CFS/MCS can be life threatening.
Shame on The Independent for publishing this rubbish.
From Peter Evans, former Registered Nurse and survivor of ME/CFS/MCS for over 25 years.
M.E./ C.F.S. services offered in the U.K. often exist without a doctor heading the team!
Too those of you in dispair please contact www.afme.org.uk or if you can find someone within your area to talk to who also has the disease. Don't give up hope. Thankfully we have meresearch.org.uk who will accept donations for research. Biomedical research is the answer. Remember that one day we may be back to normal as a result of people like Dr Jonathan Kerr (also the team at Whittemore Peterson, U.S.A.)
Please Jeremy Lawrence speak to people who live with the disease as well as those who are working to help find the answers.
- Dr. Marc Loveless
As for ME/CFS not existing in France, how does one explain the French Association of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Fibromyalgia?
When will The 'Independent' live up to its name and start questioning his reckless statements?
Within a week he collapsed and went into a coma for 14 days. When he woke he could neither move, hear or see. He did regain his sight and hearing, and lives fairly independently now, but is a quadraplegic to this day.
No doctor has been able to tell him definitively what he has or what caused it. It was thought that it was MS for a while, but ultimately no one seems to be sure.
The moral of the story is that going into denial about being sick and ignoring what our bodies are trying to tell us does no one any good. The typical psychological profile of people who have Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Fibromyalgia tends to be that of overachieving perfectionists who take on too much. This is a far cry from the type of people that Wessely is describing who "restrict their activities beyond what is necessary, and getting demoralised". What demoralises people is the reactions they get time and time again from ignorant and misinformed people who possibly read an article like this one!
On the one hand people with ME/CFS are told by specialists to listen to their bodies and not to do to much. When they do this, they are told by Wessley that they are catastrophising their illness!
I was told that I developed Chronic Fatigue Sydrome by ignoring the sypmtoms of a virus I contracted whilst in Tunisia; which is precisely the opposite of Wessley`s theory.Damned if you do and damned if you don`t!!!
I am appalled at the Independent for having published Wessley`s out of date rhetoric instead of scientific evidence i.e. by Dr Myhill as to the cause of ME/CFS. Along with Michael Sharpe, Wessley is well known to be in the pockets of insurance companies who don`t want to pay out to people who have this devastating and debilitating illness.
Professor Wesseley, by the kind of lumping together of wide-ranging problems demonstrated in the article above, has created the factitious category Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, which is defined as any condition which includes fatigue lasting more than six months. There are many conditions, with a variety of causes, which include long-lasting fatigue as a symptoms. Some of these may benefit from exercise, and if there are enough of them, the case is made that 'CFS patients benefit from exercise'. Then the anomalous patient, who has ME and is harmed by exercise can be labelled as 'neurotic', 'having wrong thinking patterns', 'difficult', 'malingering', and this in turn can be taken to justify quite extreme pressure to exert themselves. The result? NICE treatment guidelines which, when applied to ME, will unquestionably make the patient worse, definitely delay or permanently preclude recovery, and can cause long-term or permanent disability or, in extreme cases, death.
Detection of herpesviruses and parvovirus b19 in gastric and intestinal m
ucosa of chronic fatigue syndrome patients.
Journal: In Vivo. 2009 Mar-Apr;23(2):209-13.
Authors: Fr=E9mont M, Metzger K, Rady H, Hulstaert J, DE Meirleir K.
Affiliation: Protea Biopharma, Z.1-Researchpark 100, 1731 Zellik, Belgium
. <mfremont@proteabiopharma.com>.
NLM Citation: PMID: 19414405
BACKGROUND: Human herpesvirus-6 (HHV-6), Epstein-Barr virus and parvovirus B19 have been suggested as etiological agents of chronic fatigue syndrome but none of these viruses is consistently detected in all patients. However, active viral infections may be localized in specific tissues, and,
therefore, are not easily detectable. The aim of this study was to investigate the presence of HHV-6, HHV-7, EBV and parvovirus B19 in the gastro
-intestinal tract of CFS patients.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using real-time PCR, viral DNA loads were quantified in gastro-intestinal biopsies of 48 CFS patients and 35 controls.
RESULTS: High loads of HHV-7 DNA were detected in most CFS and control bi
opsies. EBV and HHV-6 were detected in 15-30% of all biopsies. Parvovirus
B19 DNA was detected in 40% of the patients versus less than 15% of the
controls.
CONCLUSION: Parvovirus B19 may be involved in the pathogenesis of CFS, at
least for a subset of patients. The gastro-intestinal tract appears as an important reservoir of infection for several potentially pathogenic viruses.
"Evidence of dysfunctional pain inhibition in Fibromyalgia reflected
in rACC during provoked pain.
Pain. 2009 Apr 30.
Jensen KB, Kosek E, Petzke F, Carville S, Fransson P, Marcus H,
Williams SC, Choy E, Giesecke T, Mainguy Y, Gracely R, Ingvar M.
Stockholm Brain Institute, Osher Center for Integrative Medicine,
Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
PMID: 19410366
Over the years, many have viewed Fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) as a
so-called "functional disorder" and patients have experienced a
concomitant lack of interest and legitimacy from the medical
profession. The symptoms have not been explained by peripheral
mechanisms alone nor by specific central nervous system mechanisms.
In this study, we objectively evaluated the cerebral response to
individually calibrated pain provocations of a pain-free body region
(thumbnail).
The study comprised 16 female FMS patients and 16 individually
age-matched controls. Brain activity was measured using functional
magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during individually calibrated
painful pressures representing 50mm on a visual analogue scale (VAS)
ranging from 0 to 100mm.
Patients exhibited higher sensitivity to pain provocation than
controls as they required less pressure to evoke equal pain
magnitudes (U(A)=48, p<.002). Despite lower pressures applied in
patients at VAS 50mm, the fMRI-analysis revealed no difference in
activity in brain regions relating to attention and affect or regions
with sensory projections from the stimulated body area. However, in
the primary link in the descending pain regulating system (the
rostral anterior cingulate cortex) the patients failed to respond to
pain provocation. The attenuated response to pain in this brain
region is the first demonstration of a specific brain region where
the impairment of pain inhibition in FMS patients is expressed.
These results validate previous reports of dysfunctional endogenous
pain inhibition in FMS and advance the understanding of the central
pathophysiologic mechanisms, providing a new direction for the
development of successful treatments in FMS."
Here is a link to the show.
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/innovative
Tom