Cannabis: An apology
In 1997, this newspaper launched a campaign to decriminalise the drug. If only we had known then what we can reveal today...
Record numbers of teenagers are requiring drug treatment as a result of smoking skunk, the highly potent cannabis strain that is 25 times stronger than resin sold a decade ago.
More than 22,000 people were treated last year for cannabis addiction - and almost half of those affected were under 18. With doctors and drugs experts warning that skunk can be as damaging as cocaine and heroin, leading to mental health problems and psychosis for thousands of teenagers, The Independent on Sunday has today reversed its landmark campaign for cannabis use to be decriminalised.
A decade after this newspaper's stance culminated in a 16,000-strong pro-cannabis march to London's Hyde Park - and was credited with forcing the Government to downgrade the legal status of cannabis to class C - an IoS editorial states that there is growing proof that skunk causes mental illness and psychosis.
The decision comes as statistics from the NHS National Treatment Agency show that the number of young people in treatment almost doubled from about 5,000 in 2005 to 9,600 in 2006, and that 13,000 adults also needed treatment.
The skunk smoked by the majority of young Britons bears no relation to traditional cannabis resin - with a 25-fold increase in the amount of the main psychoactive ingredient, tetrahydrocannabidinol (THC), typically found in the early 1990s. New research being published in this week's Lancet will show how cannabis is more dangerous than LSD and ecstasy. Experts analysed 20 substances for addictiveness, social harm and physical damage. The results will increase the pressure on the Government to have a full debate on drugs, and a new independent UK drug policy commission being launched next month will call for a rethink on the issue.
The findings last night reignited the debate about cannabis use, with a growing number of specialists saying that the drug bears no relation to the substance most law-makers would recognise. Professor Colin Blakemore, chief of the Medical Research Council, who backed our original campaign for cannabis to be decriminalised, has also changed his mind.
He said: "The link between cannabis and psychosis is quite clear now; it wasn't 10 years ago."
Many medical specialists agree that the debate has changed. Robin Murray, professor of psychiatry at London's Institute of Psychiatry, estimates that at least 25,000 of the 250,000 schizophrenics in the UK could have avoided the illness if they had not used cannabis. "The number of people taking cannabis may not be rising, but what people are taking is much more powerful, so there is a question of whether a few years on we may see more people getting ill as a consequence of that."
"Society has seriously underestimated how dangerous cannabis really is," said Professor Neil McKeganey, from Glasgow University's Centre for Drug Misuse Research. "We could well see over the next 10 years increasing numbers of young people in serious difficulties."
Politicians have also hardened their stance. David Cameron, the Conservative leader, has changed his mind over the classification of cannabis, after backing successful calls to downgrade the drug from B to C in 2002. He abandoned that position last year, before the IoS revealed that he had smoked cannabis as a teenager, and now wants the drug's original classification to be restored.
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited






Comments
Thank you for your honest, you stock in jounalistic intergrity just split.
The prohibition of recreational/medicinal drugs has, and always will, force them underground and fund the criminal black market. This prevents any kind of control of use and supply.
Consider the deadly bath tub gin in America.
The majority of cannabis used in the UK is grown in the UK. Not by genetic engineers. Not by professional horticulturists in high tech laboratories, but by humble home growers. Many of which are medicinal users who have chosen to 'Ditch the Dealers' and self medicate. The strength of cannabis is determined by the legal seed trade, and there are as many if not more available varieties than dahlias or roses.
The illegality of cannabis does not enable the user to choose what variety or strength he/she consumes when buying off the street. Very often Contaminated with glass, lead, silica, pesticides and unflushed nitrates which is far more dangerous to health than T.H.C. levels. The T.H.C. levels are determined by the producer of the hybridised seed not the grower.
Legalisation of cannabis could enforce restrictions on producing, supplying and use of cannabis. Truly CONTROLLING the herb. Prolonged heavy use of stronger strains of cannabis by the undeveloped minds of under 21 year olds is naturally going to cause additional issues. (see legal age limit on alcohol and its reasons) Alcohol is legal to produce at home and its strength is unregulated.
Allow those who choose to do so grow their own, on a small scale. License coffeeshops and tax the herb itself. This will take the finance out of the pockets of organised crime and put it into our diminishing government coffers. Enforce penalties for unlicensed trade.
Nothing in excess is good. Coffee, Tobacco, alcohol, Hydrogenated vegetable fat, Vitamin c, milk, cheese....Peanuts. Yet it is our human right to choose how we treat our own bodies. The use of cannabis has no victims and therefore is only a crime because of its legality. The biggest danger to 99 percent of users is the fear of imprisonment.
Non adults should not use ANY recreational drugs... Not rocket science. How is this prevented? Legalisation, regulation and taxation. The most important is education. Sinsemilla (the correct term for skunk) is not dangerous. It is the unregulated supply and use that is causing the harm.
Common sense.............
Also, lets say a major country like the US legalized the sale of the drug and tried to control the market. They would try to tax and regulate as you say. Why would any of the drug dealers who are sneaking it into countries illegally be willing to pay taxes for their 'goods' (if you can call it that). Why would they pay more when they can keep smuggling it in and sell straight to the consumer. Either way they are still breaking the law so why should they care. The consequences are the same either way but if they continue to smuggle they dont have to pay taxes. It's absurd to think smugglers and dealers would want to make any less by selling legally and being taxed when they can keep selling illegally keep the same risks and make more cash.
Oh and by the way the strength of Alcohol is regulated in the States. It's illegal to distill hard liquor in the States without a license for safety reasons whereas any joe can brew beer without a license at home. Do some research before you claim things like that.
Oh and to regress to my point about dealers still selling illegally for cheaper. Legalizing and what you call 'educating' children wont stop them from using. Look at alcohol education in the state. Loads of people underage still drink. They buy nadylight cause its cheap and easy to get. The same would happen with 'underage youth' if marijuana were legalized. Kids would still get it and they would find the cheapest way to get it which would probably also be the most dangerous forms of it laced with who knows what.