Extra millions for baby units denied
Ministers reject task force's call to invest £89m a year in NHS neonatal units
Ministers last night pulled the plug on funding to bring the care of the sickest babies up to the standard for adults, in a sign of the impact of the credit crunch on the NHS.
Ministers had been expected to find the cash to back the recommendations of a task force on neonatal care. Its report, published today, identifies a shortfall of 2,700 nurses and 300 other staff, such as physiotherapists and dietitians, in England's 162 neonatal units. Neonatal care is that delivered to babies in the first 28 days of life.
The Neonatal Taskforce, appointed a year ago under the chairmanship of Sir Bruce Keogh, deputy chief medical officer, said sick babies should have one-to-one nursing in intensive care – the same standard already given to sick adults – in line with recommendations that have been made by professional medical organisations for the past 15 years. It recommended investment of £89m a year, with one-off costs of £102m, to bring care up to the necessary standard.
But ministers have refused to allocate the extra cash, which the taskforce says must instead be found from within local health budgets. The NHS is already facing demands to find £15bn-£20bn of savings by 2014, as a result of the credit crunch.
In 2007, 2,127 babies died in the first 28 days of life in England. Sixty per cent of all infant deaths occur in the neonatal period and evidence shows that one-to-one nursing reduces deaths and disability.
The Taskforce's recommendations had been widely anticipated and medical organisations said yesterday they had only been waiting to learn whether the Government would put its money where its mouth was. Almost one-third (30 per cent) of the 46 neonatal intensive care units in England have too few staff to deliver one-to-one care to the 19,500 babies they cared for in 2007.
Andy Cole, chief executive of Bliss, the premature baby charity, said it was a "huge missed opportunity". He added that the investment recommended by the taskforce to provide a "world class service" would cost less than £150 for every baby born. "That is the kind of insurance policy most parents would be prepared to take out to ensure their baby got the best standard of critical care, should they need it. We hope the NHS will find the money to deliver it," he said.
The Royal College of Nursing welcomed the report but criticised the lack of funding, and the Royal College of Paediatrics urged the Government to ensure the resources were made available.
Ann Keen, health minister, said: "Having a sick baby is very distressing for parents at what should be one of their happiest moments. That's why we're providing the NHS with practical guidance on how to make neonatal services even better and take a family-centred approach to care."
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited






Comments
Swine flu - let's pay for your tissues
Cerverax - we'll pay for your vaccination but not for a youth centre
Premature baby, - we'll keep you comfortable but not on life support
They will spend our money bailing out multi billion pound business', they will spend millions on themselves, but nothing on the next generation.
Message to the PM
1) STOP all immigration, and deport those already here - saving a few billion in benefits
2) STOP using OUR money to pay yourselves rediculous wages and expences after all, the government hasnt exactly earned it recently
3) START listing to what the public actually want, how WE want OUR money spent.
And Mr. Brown wonders why he is hated so much by the voters.
BUT...as long as teh MPs, especially the ones who rescinded teh funding for teh extra care units, can have a second home then I'd say our money is well spent - dont' you?!
The fact that this hasn't caused us to riot on the streets in protest is absolutely disgusting. How dare they get away with this?!
Bastards - the lot of them.
Recession?
What recession?
More billions just been given to the scummy banks.....i dont smell a recession from where i stand.
It is not in the taxpayers interests to pay for better services for their children. Because their children are not useful to Goldman Sachs or others of their ilk perhaps?
At the end of the day though we are all guilty for allowing this to happen.
If NICE decide treatment then let the same criteria apply to the whole population. We need to discuss which treatments are to be paid for under the NHS and querry our treatment of Neonates and IVF and many other treatments.
Funny how it can be found for the other scum bags of the banking world!!!
Roll on the general election and get rid of this poxy government.
Let us and them see their name in print and then let us see how brave they really are...
Where and how do we find such information?
Gordon Brown knows exactly what it is like to watch a baby die, yet he has consistently dienied funding to neonatal units. On the same day that the media reported his appearance on Mumsnet, and being asked about his favourite biscuit, there was a small item about Nicholas Cage donating money to help Bath's neonatal unit. Does that moral compass he brags about not tell him that there is something wrong with having a Hollywood star, and the general public, raise money whilst his clunking fist remains firmly in his pocket?
Ands what about the millions he gave away to promote Fairtrade?