Health & Families

9° London Hi 11°C / Lo 6°C

Gene therapy offers hope of cure for HIV

Doctors rid man of the virus with bone marrow transplant breakthrough

By Jeremy Laurance, Health Editor

Doctors have succeeded in ridding a man of the HIV virus by giving him a bone marrow transplant in what they claim is the closest treatment yet to a cure for the disease.

The remarkable case gives new impetus to the development of gene therapy for HIV which could ultimately replace the need for expensive and toxic antiretroviral drugs. Instead of taking drugs for life, HIV sufferers might instead have a one-off treatment that would leave them virus-free.

The 42-year-old American had been infected with HIV for a decade. He was treated with antiretroviral drugs in Berlin, where he lives, for four years to hold the disease in check, but then developed leukaemia. Since being given a bone marrow transplant two years ago, he has not taken antiretroviral drugs to control HIV and has had no resurgence of either disease. He is believed to be the longest HIV-free survivor who was previously treated with antiretroviral drugs. Full details of the case are published for the first time today in The New England Journal of Medicine. An editorial in the journal says it "places further emphasis on gene therapies" for HIV, adding: "The case paves the way for innovative approaches that provide long-lasting viral control with limited toxicities for persons with HIV infection."

The man's treatment began with a search by doctors at Berlin's Charité Hospital for a bone marrow donor with a genetic resistance to HIV. One of the strangest features of the disease is the way some people who have been exposed to the virus on many occasions remain uninfected. Twenty years ago, it was noticed that certain prostitutes in Nairobi remained uninfected despite exposure to the virus through thousands of sexual contacts.

It has since emerged that some people carry a mutation of a gene (CCR5) that confers protection against HIV. In Western populations an estimated one to three per cent have the mutation.

Dr Gero Hutter, a haematologist at the Berlin Charité Hospital, and colleagues tested 61 potential donors before they found one with the CCR5 genetic mutation, who agreed to the operation.

The American recipient of the transplant, who runs a holiday rentals business in the German capital, has undergone regular checks in the two years since the treatment. The doctors have tested his bone marrow, blood and tissues and found no sign of HIV. "For as long as the viral load remains undetectable, this patient will not require antiretroviral therapy," they say in the journal.

Speaking to The Independent yesterday, Dr Hutter said there had been several previous reports of patients being virus-free following treatment but none to compare with the latest case. "The difference is that in our patient we had a plan. It was not an accident," he added. "It is the longest time someone who has had antiretroviral therapy and stopped has lasted without the virus rebounding. Normally it rebounds within weeks. It is the closest we have come to a cure."

Dr Hutter said a bone marrow transplant would be too risky as a routine treatment for HIV and too difficult to find donors with the right genetic make-up. But a modification of the approach using gene therapy to render a patient HIV-resistant could work, he said.

Even a costly treatment could be worthwhile. The price of treatment with antiretrovirals in Europe is €70,000 to €80,000 (£63,000 to £72,000) a year compared with a one-off cost of €20,000 to €30,000 for a bone marrow transplant.

Dr Hutter said: "When I started in medicine, HIV was completely untreatable. Now the situation has changed completely. Perhaps our case is a glimpse of hope for the future."

Professor Jay Levy, an Aids specialist at the University of California, and author of the US journal's editorial, said claims that the patient had been cured of HIV would be premature because of the virus's capacity to hide in other parts of the body including the brain, gut, liver and lymphatic system, from which it could always re-emerge.

"Nevertheless, the results... provide further encouragement for those examining approaches to treatment that reduce CCR5 expression in persons with HIV infection," he writes.In 2007, an estimated two million people died from Aids and 2.7 million were newly infected with HIV.

25 years of research: The HIV virus

When the discovery of HIV was announced in 1984, US politicians predicted that a cure for Aids would be found within five years, but it is still a distant prospect.

Over the past 10 years, a cocktail of aggressive antiretroviral drugs has been developed to help keep the effects of the disease at bay. Eliminating it has proved far more difficult because of the virus's unique nature.

HIV integrates itself into an infected person's DNA and attacks the cells the immune system sends to attack it. Once infected, these T-cells take the virus deeper into the body. Gene therapy is a new approach that harnesses the natural resistance to HIV shared by 3 per cent of people.

Experts hope that by tweaking a sufferer's DNA, they can achieve "long-lasting viral control".

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

antiretroviral drugs and leukeamia
[info]mind_ful wrote:
Thursday, 12 February 2009 at 07:59 am (UTC)
Its inteersting that we now haaar that antiretroviral drugs casue leukaemia. This is neer mentioned until 'a fantastic new cure' is found. Actually - prepared to be gob-smacked - Homoeopathy can restore any immune-system, even one with HIV virus, to full heatlh at almost no cost and certainly less trauma than a bone-marrow transplant. What a shame the billions going into gene therapy can't be invested into this proven and scientific system of medicine - and all because about 6 ignorant flat-earth society, self-styled 'quack-busters' don't like it.
Re: antiretroviral drugs and leukeamia
[info]jennyescapes wrote:
Thursday, 12 February 2009 at 08:55 am (UTC)
Dear Idiot,

Homeopathy does not cure HIV or Aids. Suggesting that it does is pernicious and dangerous, and tantamount to selling 'magic vitamin tablets' to people who are scared and dying and vulnerable. Please look up the Guardian's legal case against a self-proclaimed 'doctor' who did so in Africa with the resulting deaths of hundreds of people.

Possibly homeopathy does have other applications. It might, for example, one day help you to develop a modicum of sense or responsibility. However, I strongly doubt it. In the meantime, if you really have such all-consuming faith in homeopathy, you could try catching one of these appalling diseases and see how helpful your self-prescribed treatment is.
Re: antiretroviral drugs and leukeamia
[info]sara_sense wrote:
Thursday, 12 February 2009 at 10:01 am (UTC)
Dear Jennyescapes,

I second what you said. I wonder if our unlearned friend understands the irony in calling scientists 'flat earthers'? Doubt it :-)
Re: antiretroviral drugs and leukeamia
[info]bbobgd wrote:
Thursday, 12 February 2009 at 04:45 pm (UTC)
perhaps some one with some common sense should mention that HIV/Aids does not need a cure becasue it is 100% preventable.........duh. It's like saying that putting your hand in a meat grinder needs a cure. it doesn't need a cure it needs a warning label. if someone chooses to live a high risk lifestyle and then ends up infected why should my tax dollars pay for it. the answer for Africa is not to make antivirals available to them it is to educate them in how to prevent it. Same in the States and the EU. Education is cheaper than drugs. The ONLY HIV/Aids victims I feel any empathy for are infants who have no choice, rape victims and those who truly don't understand it's transmission. ie some in 3rd world nations. If you want Aids to go away, educate,educate,educate, and leave those who choose risky lifestyles anyway to their own devices. I think darwin called that natural selection. I know personal responsability and consequences are not "In Style" anymore but come on people. I have Gay friends and I tell them the same thing, if you go to a club in Miami and have sex with people you don't know, Condom or not you desrve what you get.
Re: antiretroviral drugs and leukeamia
[info]urso_74 wrote:
Thursday, 12 February 2009 at 05:35 pm (UTC)
bbogd,
Good point... guess what, Diabetes is preventable if potential sufferers eat right and exercise. However those who do not choose to should be well informed by your enlightened and kind comments. Would you like to revisit a containment policy like the one proposed by California politicians decades ago to round up all HIV patients and ship 'em off to an island? Perhaps you'd like some large high-heat ovens to, ahem, sanitize the population, afterall manufacturing and procuring said ovens would undoubtedly stimulate the economy. Although I agree that the disease is preventable, your blunt and rather idiotic comment that condom or not "you deserve what you get" makes me suspect your various and sundry gay friends (which by the way reads like a false "Some of my best friends are..." line) are fictitious in nature.
In closing, risky behavior is nowhere nearly as big a transmit-threat as ignorance is.
Re: antiretroviral drugs and leukeamia
[info]lisanicol wrote:
Thursday, 12 February 2009 at 05:59 pm (UTC)
I'm so glad that you live in a world where Power relations are so clear. In many instances in which HIV is contracted, power is not symmetrical. This could be due to structural violence, domestic violency, and the like. In addition infants do not have the ability to opt out of the behavior of their parents' -- risky, coerced, or not. It is important that dynamics other than those of an individual nature be illuminated when talking about HIV/AIDS. If we do so we might find that prevention is not as simple as ABC [Abstinence, Being Faithful, Condoms].

Lisa
Re: antiretroviral drugs and leukeamia
[info]woodycox wrote:
Thursday, 12 February 2009 at 05:59 pm (UTC)
So true, so true !!! Cancer kills 1 in 5......show them the money, not show me your booty call penalty.

Woody C.
Texas
Re: antiretroviral drugs and leukeamia
[info]legend75 wrote:
Friday, 13 February 2009 at 01:10 am (UTC)
Aids is a behavioral dis-order. In 98% of cases it is contracted thru irresponsibility. It's real easy to not get AIDS.
Re: antiretroviral drugs and leukeamia
[info]nobullhere wrote:
Friday, 27 March 2009 at 06:26 am (UTC)
really, dumb stupid, fool. So, those who contact via blood transfusion, i.e. infected needles, who were trying to help to donate blood are irresponsible, huh. Its animals like you that make me so sick and honeslt question if freedom of speech should not be denied some people. Please, watch what you say or dont speak at all.
Re: antiretroviral drugs and leukeamia
[info]mattashby1974 wrote:
Friday, 13 February 2009 at 03:12 am (UTC)
bbobgd
I'm surprised you have any friends, gay or straight - so sanctimonious.
Re: antiretroviral drugs and leukeamia
[info]tremosf8 wrote:
Saturday, 14 February 2009 at 02:52 am (UTC)
I only have one issue with your argument. If you study the spread of HIV/AIDS in Africa, the better the education about the disease has gotten the higher the prevalence of HIV/AIDS. In the past 10 years it has become fairly clear that a different method needs to be found as to how to stop the epidemic in Africa.

Additionally, if you truly believe that natural selection justifies this death, I'm ashamed that we're a member of the same species.
Re: antiretroviral drugs and leukeamia
[info]hivmarine wrote:
Monday, 30 March 2009 at 05:39 am (UTC)
DUH...Well its not 100% preventable considering the 10,000 Vetrans who recieved colonoscopies from THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT HOSPITALS and now DUH! There positve! Narrow minded opinions, from A-holes like Yourself Gives people what YOU YOURSELF DERSERVE, Your gay and this is Your opinion??

Buts let us look closely here at what the title of this web page was about ,.....a treatment that would provides cure for AIDS thru gentic manupulation, not HARTT Drugs...MMMMMmmm seems to me Duh, YOU WERE ON THE INTERNET late at nite looking for a treatment for AIDS, typed google( Cure!!), What's wrong Duh? Feeling tired all time, strange erruptions from the skin in Florida from the sun you think???..But they don't heel..??? When You go to the emergency room they do a CBC panel on you and they total Lymphocites are Low and ask for more tests and You, Duh, run out the door??????, Eat a salad and You get the Runs? White patches on Your tongue( Candisis).. You will Looking in the bathroom mirror after this post! LOL, and not eating salad

If I had a dollar Bill for Your Type I have beared witness thru the three decades of this horrible desease, But the truth is those dollar bills would be in a seperate pile called , HATERED
Your a sexual being and guess what YOU CAN"T BE! So you vent your hatred against your own kind saying its thier own fault..Your worse than a German prison guard in a consintration camp and the Big Secrete is your a Jew your self, ohhhh I have seen your type so many ways and flavors, but the kicker is you end postive in the end, screaming for help!
Re: antiretroviral drugs and leukeamia
[info]jollysnail wrote:
Thursday, 12 February 2009 at 05:38 pm (UTC)
If homeopathy was that great, surely someone else might have noticed it, and done some serious scientific research to prove it. If this had happened, then homeopathy would have been reclassified as convential medicine as opposed to alternative medicine, which by definition is unproven. The real waste of money in medicine in recent years has been 20 million pounds makeover for the Royal Homeopathic Hospital in London. 20 million pounds for purified water? Oh dear.
Re: antiretroviral drugs and leukeamia
[info]francisfp wrote:
Thursday, 12 February 2009 at 11:12 pm (UTC)
Anyone heard about a company named Sangamo science? (SGMO)
Re: antiretroviral drugs and leukeamia
[info]chronicitis wrote:
Saturday, 18 July 2009 at 12:10 pm (UTC)
you know what I agree with this person right here. I can't belive that there are people out there who dedicate thier lives to finding help for people and some bad mouthed person gets on here and says its not true. Even though they are not a sientist themselves maybe. Wow maybe we should just stop looking for something to help them and let them die its not like condoms break or anything or we should just stop having intamacy. Yeah lets all stop having sex so the human race can die off, good idea. Oh yeah and lets stop watching TV that brings our acidic level up and stop eating crap that gives us cancer only caused by high acid levels in the body. The body only produces cancer if it as a high acid ph and yet all you fools out there keep taking it in like lab rats. Lets stop looking for a cure yeah good idea lets take our chances with Trojon and hope it doesn't break and we get it that way even though we were responsible. Lets not forget that Ive known people who got it and lived thier lives to the fullest still and did not let it stop them from being happy. Does any bad mouthed person on this site have the strength too live a happy life with the virus or would you crawl into a corner like an insect. Life is short and people like those on this site are worse at it than most of the strong people with HIV. Have Hope, Live Life, and love no matter what peace out
Crumbs - the Independent sits up and takes notice..
[info]rwthplb wrote:
Thursday, 12 February 2009 at 08:00 am (UTC)
The original reports are at least three months old - and - this is a single individual. If you can't be bothered to pay for a science editor, at least have the grace to recognise that this is old new and your readers will probably have heard it from elsewhere (actually multiple elsewheres) most of which will have provided a far better analysis of significance, risks and futures.
Re: Crumbs - the Independent sits up and takes notice..
[info]paulbrowne wrote:
Thursday, 12 February 2009 at 11:30 am (UTC)
To be fair the paper describing this case has only just been published, I'd honestly prefer it if newspapers waited until the paper had passed peer review and been published before reporting.

There's more on efforts to develop gene therapy approaches to this at
http://esciencenews.com/articles/2008/12/05/uc.davis.researchers.exploring.gene.therapy.fight.aids
Re: Crumbs - the Independent sits up and takes notice..
[info]paulbrowne wrote:
Thursday, 12 February 2009 at 11:33 am (UTC)
To be fair the actual journal report has just been published. I'd prefer if more newspapers waited until interesting results had passed peer review and been properly published, rather than printing an overexcited report based on just a press release.

Efforts are indeed underway to develop a gene therapy approach to achieve the results seen in this case.
http://esciencenews.com/articles/2008/12/05/uc.davis.researchers.exploring.gene.therapy.fight.aids
Re: Crumbs - the Independent sits up and takes notice..
[info]paulbrowne wrote:
Thursday, 12 February 2009 at 12:47 pm (UTC)
t the double post, I thought my first hadn't made it through.
I wonder when.
[info]tommytcg wrote:
Thursday, 12 February 2009 at 08:47 am (UTC)
it will leak out that nano-reduced colloidal silver is a powerful anti viral, herpes in one dose and....
Cure for HIV
[info]amegashie_viglo wrote:
Thursday, 12 February 2009 at 09:44 am (UTC)
This is an encouraging and a refreshing development for the survival of humanity on this planet. More crease to the elbows of the scientists involved in the research.
Homoeopathy!!! Get real!
[info]scotslass1978 wrote:
Thursday, 12 February 2009 at 09:59 am (UTC)
Just had to reply to person who thinks homoeopathy can cure HIV and AIDS...I am a social care worker and for 8 years have worked solely with people who have HIV. I find it disgusting that you can spout such rubbish. I ask you to go and support people who have this horrendous disease, which it turn causes a whole spectrum of other conditions, many of them painful and debilitating and tell them that homoeopathy is the way forward! Personally, I think the gene therapy is promising but we are still a long way away from a cure.
[info]gerston wrote:
Thursday, 12 February 2009 at 09:59 am (UTC)
.................... "When the 'discovery' of HIV was annnounced in 1984, US politians predicted that a cure for AIDS would be found within five years, but it is still a distant prospect."

Well, of course it's still a distant prospect. At 70,000-80,000 Euros a year for the antiretoviral poison to treat a disease ('HIV') that is not a disease, what self-respecting pharmnaceutical company would not do all they could to encourage the propoganda.

When the history of or times is written in years to come, the whole HIV / AIDS scam will go down as one of the greatest scandals and acts of inhumanity.
Homeopathy could cure my partner????
[info]jon_dole wrote:
Thursday, 12 February 2009 at 10:05 am (UTC)
Never mind what the report says about CCR5 and the possibility of bone marrow transplants! I'm just going to put all my, and my partners, hopes into homeopathy! She's been on the antiretrovirals for over a decade and, although she's thankful to be alive, they have left their mark on her, both physically and mentally. Her physiology has changed and her mental state can fluctuate with the impact of these drugs that keep her alive but I'll be delighted to tell her that all her hopes and fears for a cure are at an end because of homeopathy! Will I tell her that? Will I inform her that all her trawling through 'Positive' magazines with a degree of optimism that blows me away are uncalled-for because 'Homeopathy Monthly' is all she needed to read? Will I tell her that? NO I F*****G WON'T! Pardon my language but I absolutely detest these mindless fools that preach 'wonder' cures that have been sitting under our noses all this time! Keep your 'knowledge' to yourself when it concerns something that warrants your perusal upon reading a newspaper article, my partner and I dwell on this subject all the time. We don't give up hope and, although I'm sure you would see it as foolhardy, we put our faith in Science! Homeopathy as a cure for HIV? F**k Off...
Re: Homeopathy could cure my partner????
[info]scotslass1978 wrote:
Thursday, 12 February 2009 at 10:11 am (UTC)
Well said!!!
old sayings
[info]vhawk1951 wrote:
Thursday, 12 February 2009 at 11:00 am (UTC)
obviously there is some sense in I can feel it in my marrow
Bogus cures
[info]drmagyar wrote:
Thursday, 12 February 2009 at 12:41 pm (UTC)
If it is not already illegal to promote bogus cures for life threatening diseases, it should be.
Why can't we prosecute and lock up these idiots?
Let's get tested TOGETHER BEFORE we have sex, for A VARIETY of STDs.
[info]dsaklad wrote:
Thursday, 12 February 2009 at 12:59 pm (UTC)
a) How widespread is the phenomenon?...
b) are the rates of new infections zero or nearly zero for sex partners taking part in the phenomenon?... of the strategy of "Let's get tested TOGETHER BEFORE we have sex, for A VARIETY of STDs." Sexual health checkups reduce ambiguity and can be like anything else POTENTIAL sex partners do together.
Sangamo Biosciences gene therapy PI trial has started
[info]oldjohnt wrote:
Thursday, 12 February 2009 at 01:19 pm (UTC)
Sangamo Biosciences and the University of Pennsylvania has started a gene therapy study to modify the CCR5 gene . The patients own cells are modified outside the body and infused. This should result in an immune system that is not damaged by the HIV virus. This is the same concept as the german patient.
HIV Cure
[info]costa26 wrote:
Thursday, 12 February 2009 at 01:29 pm (UTC)
I hope for everyone that has to live with HIV, like myself that this is a breakthrough. It is true that the current treatments are very expensive and we are fortunate enough to live in the EU where treatments are free. Many people who suffer with HIV and especially those in Sub Saharan Africa, sometime feel that the Pharmaceutical companies are 'prolonging' the date of the release of a cure for pure profits.

I would be keen to see more published, detailed research on this as soon as possible. The cost in the long term will be much less to all health authorities. I, as a HIV sufferer am pleased but even now I would not wish HIV on anyone. My simple advice would be to anyone sexually active; wear protection, get tested regularly and be responsible.

'HIV patient, Spain'
[info]alexsimpson01 wrote:
Thursday, 12 February 2009 at 02:19 pm (UTC)
First fo all I would like to confess that I am no medical expert. I am however, pretty astute when it comes to understanding the nature of politics. So what if we do come across a cure for HIV, do people seriously believe that the ethics of the pharmaceutical industry along with our governments are ever going to use such a cure in order to treat the HIV sufferers within the 'developing' world? We already have the necessary medicine to treat the many Africans with HIV that will allow those infected to live a better life, we already have the medicine to prevent HIV from becoming a death sentance. But despite having such capacity, along with decades of political PR propaganda where our 'leaders' have consistently proclaimed their mission in combating the prevalence of HIV/AIDS, the fact is that we dont. Within the 'developing world, where the prevalence of HIV and AIDS is at its greatest, and where those suffer the most for pure economic reasons, the simple yet ghastly fact is that our governments are just not interested in helping the worlds poorest. Instead we view them as the worlds unpeople, where we stuff them within a process described under the guise of the term 'globalisation'. I would rather refer to this era as perhaps neo-colonialism, or neo-imperialism, whichever you like.

Within the developing world, we will help those with HIV/AIDS about as much as we do to fight poverty as a whole. For instance, the UN rightfully point out that we already have enough food in the world to feed every human being on this planet, but we dont. Instead, the corporate monopolisatin of the global food chain appear more than happy to leave us with the statistic, again that the UN point out, that there are currently over 850 million people who suffer from starvation and food insecurity, and what do we see? More people being plunged into further food insecurity and starvation. And on another count, with the much hyped Millenium Development Goals, the developed worlds targets towards cutting child mortality rates within sub-Saharan Africa will not be met until 2115 if current trends continue - one hundred years after the target date (and this trend is decades old).

So when we hear of any possible breakthrough in medical advances, spare a though for the worlds most marginalised people, and then question the ethics and motivations that lie behind the beholders of such cures, for the reality is that never before have we had the capacity to generate such wealth and advance towards technological fixes, yet never before has the gap between the worlds rich and poor been so vast, and never before has inequality been so rife. You can literally draw a line acroos the map of the world, dividing north and south, dividing the rich and poor - Governments and corporations in particular, are only interested in profits, and poor people have no money. Thats the bottom line Im afraid.
Antiretrovirals cause leukemia???????
[info]phebess wrote:
Thursday, 12 February 2009 at 03:14 pm (UTC)
I'm still trying to figure out that first statement from the idiot who thinks homeopathic treatments will cure HIV/AIDS.

HOW does one come up with that statement from the article?????????

whozat
[info]nowwhut wrote:
Thursday, 12 February 2009 at 03:51 pm (UTC)
I have lived with HIV for 15 years now and have seen numerous treatment regimens come and go. I can't count the number of antivirals I've been on since my diagnosis. When I was initially diagnosed full-blown, I was given 6 months to live and the only readily available treatment was AZT which I'm convinced killed as many people as it helped. As such, I've learned to view any claims of a pending breakthrough with a certain mix of anticipation and pragmatism. If gene modification therapy is indeed a viable possibility, perhaps the lifting of the US ban on stem cell research will progress the efforts. We PLWAs are by and large an optimistic bunch.

In regards to the comment about homoeopathy being capable of defeating HIV, all I can say is been there, done that. Bollocks! I can only guess that the person who submitted that comment is HIV-negative. Spend a few months with actual HIV survivors THEN tell me you'd be willing to risk their lives with herbs and teas.
gene therapy for HIV
[info]con_cerned wrote:
Thursday, 12 February 2009 at 06:12 pm (UTC)

Nowhere in the article and accompanying editorial is the considerable risk of this type of bone marrow transplantation described. To be successful the patient's bone marrow must be destroyed before transplantation resulting in a substantial risk of death. There are other dangers and overall, 30% of individuals will not survive the procedure. This unbalanced report is cruel, and brings into question not only the compassion but also the competence of the Independent's health editor. Some method may eventually be found to avoid the complete destruction of the patients bone marrow, but this must be far in the future. For those facing a short life expectancy, or like this patient, suffering from a hematologic malignancy the benefits of the procedure might well outweigh the risks.
It is misleading to fail to report that the considerable risk makes this procedure an unrealistic option for most.
Re: gene therapy for HIV
[info]drmagyar wrote:
Thursday, 12 February 2009 at 06:52 pm (UTC)
Not really.

I don't think they are advocating bone marrow transplant as a cure for HIV/AIDS. What they are saying is that gene therapy may be a cure. There are lots of ways to do the gene therapy. What this does show is that gene therapy might work as it appears ro have done in this form in this individual.

Other ways to do it - stem cell therapy. Another might be to take out the patient's marrow, modify it, kill their remaining marrow, stick the modified marrow back in. Or who knows what other therapies.

Point is that now they have some direction to go which might be a cure rather than just slowing down the inevitable.
Prevention is best
[info]parker1227 wrote:
Thursday, 12 February 2009 at 06:59 pm (UTC)
Millions infected yearly and millions dead or dying, and gay rights activists still think it is "the right" of male gays to go to gay bars and bath houses and have hundreds of high risk sex partners a year - and let everyone else pick up the tab as they die slow agonizing deaths from AIDS?

This is insanity!

Close down the bars and baths the trolling web-sites.

Its not "freedom", its an illness!
Re: Prevention is best
[info]mattashby1974 wrote:
Friday, 13 February 2009 at 03:18 am (UTC)
excuse me?! where did homosexuality come into this? The straight population have had a higher increase in transmissions globally over recent years. To be honest a gay man (promiscuous or otherwise) is likely to be better educated around safe sex and likelihood of transmission than a heterosexual person due to our community's education. In fact I as a gay man have just proved the point - clearly, you're heterosexual as well as an ignorant fool.
Re: Prevention is best
[info]nobullhere wrote:
Friday, 27 March 2009 at 07:04 am (UTC)
Now, I really cant take it anymore. There needs to be a life sentence, no scrath that, the DEATH penalty for ignorance akin to yours. You have the effontery, temerity and nerve to suggest HIV/Aids is the sole preserve of the gay people. Do your research, dummy, I am of African origin. Homosexuality is a taboo in Africa, which coincidentaly has one of the highest number of victims, if not the highest. These victims got the HIV not from gay sex, but mostly straight sex and straight sleeping about and straight web trolling, alongside the poor victims who were born with it.
So, the next time you want to call peoples misfortunates an illness, dont, before God hopefully strikes you with cancer of the tongue or hand, that way we can be spared the hateful crap, you spew.
A 'Cure' for HIV?
[info]marty362 wrote:
Thursday, 12 February 2009 at 07:18 pm (UTC)
I do not wish any harm on those who are infected with HIV. But I must caution anyone who looks at this therapy as a cure for HIV/AIDS. Promiscuous sexual activity is outrageously unhealthy - physically, psychologically, and emotionally. If this therapy proves successful, a new threat will present itself very soon after - if sexually irresponsible people do not change their behaviors and our culture does not change its attitude towards those behaviors.
Are you missing the otherside?
[info]apple0009 wrote:
Thursday, 12 February 2009 at 08:44 pm (UTC)
I think people are forgetting that wearing a condom in many African cultures, where the disease is most prevalent is considered a taboo. It is very well for our Western cultures to say 'educate, wear a condom' but many of those with HIV are so poor they cannot afford condoms, let alone know how to use them. Also educating people stuck in the cycle of poverty, with little education themselves can be extremely challenging. How do you expect a teacher to teach children about having protected sex if they do not even know the consequences themselves. True, it is Professionals and Westerners too who also suffer from the virus, of which it can be preventable, yet I think many people here are arguing in a narrow-minded way.
As to Homeopathy well you could only guess what I think of it as a cure for HIV. Rubbish.
Re: Are you missing the otherside?
[info]nobullhere wrote:
Friday, 27 March 2009 at 07:30 am (UTC)
Hmm, interesting point you make there. Though, I would like to know your view on this. I was raised in both Nigeria and Ghana and while growing, the FEAR of unwanted pregnancy was the beginning of wisdom and to a large extent, still is, especially among the younger men between 17 to 29. No one told them to use a condom. They always did, because they love their sex, want to enjoy it, without becoming a father. This also had the effect of helping them prevent HIV, too. I dont know how to explain it, but especially the younger ones, the coming generation there are very aware of condoms, maybe not for HIV purposes, but for pregnancy concerns. The main problem, i believe lies with the older more primitive African traditional men or women in their 50s to 80s who believe in having many children or who believe condoms are the western way of trying to influence the lives. In conclusion, re-use of infected needles in poorly funded African countries, as a subsequent pancea for HIV has not been given full credit. While lack of education on condoms plays a part, other factors contribute as well.
new hope for hiv
[info]francisfp wrote:
Thursday, 12 February 2009 at 11:13 pm (UTC)
Anyone heard about a company named sangamo science (SGMO) ?
HIV is a hoax
[info]mrtelco1948 wrote:
Thursday, 12 February 2009 at 11:15 pm (UTC)
First of all, those who supposedly have HIV, have HIV antibodies. Secondly, HIV does NOT cause AIDS, AIDS is NOT contagious, and AIDS is NOT sexually transmitted. Please read "Inventing the AIDS Virus" by Dr. Peter Duesberg. HIV/AIDS is a scam and a hoax perpetrated on the public for one reason: MONEY!!!!!! Dr. Duesberg's research has led him to the conclusion that AIDS is caused by long term recreational drug use. My cousin died supposedly from Aids a number of years ago after a blood transfusion. The truth of the matter is that she was fine until HIV antibodies were found in her blood and she was prescribed AZT. Well, her immune system was destroyed, so technically she had AIDS. However, the AZT is what destroyed her immune system. Arhtur Ashe would probably be with us today if he hadn't taken AZT. "Dr. Duesberg calls this AIDS by prescription"Usually, the above comments are stricken by some sort of moderator or so called impartial entity. If you are still reading this, PLEASE read the above book!
Re: HIV is a hoax
[info]gwazro wrote:
Friday, 13 February 2009 at 09:33 am (UTC)
You know what mr telco - I actually agree with you. It just does not make sense. Being a sufferrer, I was put on AZT and it almost KILLED me! I had to stop. Have not taken the stuff for 5 years and am now fit and healthy. I am pregnant, expecting twins and they are Hnegative and big, fat and healthy. I will not touch the stuff (AZT). I believe in prayer in Jesus Christ and meditation on healing scriptures in the bible. That works for me. Happy to hear of cure and help for many sufferers but AZT and all those HAART treatnment almost literally KILLED me. Im not saying people shouls stop taking them. Do what you must to stay alive until a definite cure is found. But for me the drugs nearly killed me literally.I kid you not.

Maria
How about the other H? Like herpes or HPV?
[info]goldenah wrote:
Thursday, 12 February 2009 at 11:16 pm (UTC)
Are they focusing on herpes, and its many variations, by any chance? There seems to be a quiet epidemic with that particular disease. I'm shocked how many illnesses are associated with it: mono, chronic fatigue, etc. Then I read that supposedly 95% of the population has it, which has to be utter nonsense.
Drugs companies profit from AIDS.
[info]alexweir1949 wrote:
Friday, 13 February 2009 at 05:56 am (UTC)
I was amazed to read that Arv treatment in the west costs euro 70000 per person per year. It is a well known fact that generic arv s cost only euro 150 to 500 pppy in the third world. Once again big pharma cheats the sick and the taxpayers. There has to be government and media corruption and collusion for this grand larceny to be permitted. Mr alex weir. Harare
CURE for HIV/AIDS....Ambush
[info]apostlemishe wrote:
Saturday, 14 February 2009 at 04:06 am (UTC)

THE CURE for HIV/AIDS.......AMBUSH

THE IDEA that AMBUSH cures AIDS
is being proven by the more than 400 individuals who have taken a dose of 60 ml three times daily for 21 days. The result is that AMBUSH 'KILLS' the virus by causing the protein envelope to rupture and the viral particles are discarded by the white blood cells. AMBUSH is able to 'KILL' the virus that are 'hiding' in the lymph system by its 'natural radioactive' properties. This process allows the body to 'return to normal health' with a corresponding immunity to that or those strains of the virus.

What is AMBUSH ?
AMBUSH is a radioactive isotope of uranium that is found in the 'palm' plant of which there are more than 3000 species. When ingested, AMBUSH causes the body temperature in the trunk area to rise to about 102 degrees when the individual is sleeping. The preparation takes four hours per batch, which is then given to the individuals for consumption 60 ml three times daily for 21 days. AMBUSH is a herbal preparation in this form but it contains an active ingredient which is a 'NEW' crystalline substance, a drug from the 'palm plant' similarly to ASPIRIN originating from the willow tree bark

RESULTS:
After 21 days on AMBUSH, ALL the individuals experienced a decrease in viral load to undetectable, an increase in cd4, increase in RBC, an improvement in general health such as more color to the face, decrease in Buffalo hump, an increase in gluteal muscles, a decrease to having no joint pains whereby individuals can bend to touch their toes, and walk up steps are but a few examples. There is also a dramatic increase in their sexual appetite beginning after the first week of therapy

DISCUSSION:
In any plant concoction such as percolated 'tea', there are 30-40,000 compounds, whi ch would take the scientific community twenty years to isolate one particular ingredient if they knew what they were looking for. The LORD GOD has given me seven steps to isolate the active ingredient, which is soft and metallic in nature and has a carbon- uranium-sulfur-(classified)-phentolamine configuration or structure. This is similar to Federick Kekule and the discovery of the benzene ring where he dreamt the structure.

apostleshadamishe@gmail.com

Here is a video taped presentation that I gave at t he Martin Luther King library in Washington

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8V53D1w__Po
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vPwuwlVBOV0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZejptOwMTzQ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CqcTgIAhrhc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f7HPKcT_iwY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9iQfgiYAnw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i3RzRS6tJDM
bone marrow transplants
[info]rolo_tamazi wrote:
Saturday, 1 August 2009 at 09:15 pm (UTC)
it is interesting that a method that has in past been suspected of holding a possible eradication method is once again in the limelight. I sincerely hope that this breakthrough leads to a more optimistic outlook from the powers that be.

Most popular in Life & Style


Free gym pass

Get fit for summer with Fitness First gyms in London

Download a free gym pass from Fitness First today

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date