Medical experts clash over use of 'danger' schizophrenia drug
Caution is killing patients earlier, claims new study by doctors in The Lancet
Excessive caution by drug regulators in Britain and abroad has contributed to the deaths of thousands of patients with severe mental illness, say doctors.
Patients with schizophrenia have been condemned to second-rate treatments, often for years, which are less effective at controlling the illness and preventing suicide because of misplaced anxiety about the safety of the most effective drug, clozapine. The pharmaceutical industry also bears a share of the responsibility for restricting the use of clozapine because it promotes more expensive but less effective drugs which bring it more profit, the doctors say today in The Lancet.
A new study shows that clozapine, always thought to be a dangerous drug, actually cut the death rate among patients with schizophrenia by 26 per cent, compared with the standard treatment. But the finding was challenged by British experts who said the serious side effects linked with clozapine meant patients needed close monitoring and it would always be a drug of last resort.
Worldwide, millions of patients with severe mental illness are treated with antipsychotic drugs to control their delusions and hallucinations. Evidence shows that, on average, they die 25 years earlier than those in the general population, partly because of increased smoking and obesity, but also by suicide.
Professor Jari Tiihonen, of the University of Kuopio, Finland, and colleagues say that the introduction of newer antipsychotics, including clozapine, in the 1990s is widely thought to have increased deaths among patients with schizophrenia. But an analysis of the data shows that, while some drugs were associated with an increased risk, clozapine lowered the risk of dying the most, despite being the drug most closely restricted by the authorities because of safety concerns.
Clozapine can cause agranulocytoisis, which destroys the white blood cells and causes falls in blood pressure, convulsions, diabetes and weight gain. Patients must have regular blood tests while taking it. Professor Tiihonen said: "In all western countries, clozapine is recommended for use only as a second-line drug, after at least two other anti-psychotics have been tried and failed. I would like to see it considered for first line use. Doctors and the [drug regulatory] authorities are too cautious.
"Patients with schizophrenia may suffer delusions and hallucinations for years while doctors try different anti-psychotics before they get to clozapine. They are not active enough in getting patients into remission. They should try clozapine earlier." In a study two years ago in the British Medical Journal, Professor Tiihonen showed that patients were less likely to stop taking taking clozapine than other anti-psychotics, despite its side effects. "Patients are more willing to use it, probably because it is effective," he said.
But Professor Tim Kendall, deputy director of the Royal College of Psychiatrist's research unit, said a major study of clozapine in China showed it was no more effective than the older antipsychotic chlorpromazine. "The evidence for first-line use is not there. Clozapine is associated with a much broader range of side-effects. It seems to have a different effect and works better in people who have tried other drugs which have failed. These findings should be interpreted with real caution."
Les Iversen, professor of pharmacology at the University of Oxford, said: "I cannot agree that clozapine should be the drug of first choice for treating schizophrenia. This is because the adverse side effect of agranulocytosis is serious and can be life-threatening. It occurs in about 2 per cent of patients, and all patients require tedious and costly monitoring, initially weekly, later monthly to detect this side-effect. For this reason, clozapine has become a drug of last resort, and will probably remain so."
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited






Comments
Of course, new drugs are very important to drug companies patents and profits.
Early on in the use of this medication suicides among those to whom clozapine was administered rose quite dramatically. Add this to the many deaths (in Finlind I believe) from agranulocytosis during early trials and it means that the ethical use of this medication must include adequate oversight and comprehensive use of medical testing and concurrent psychological services over the long term after beginning treatment with clozapine. There are those who suffer from thought disorders who cannot tolerate the constraints of such oversight and care, or the nature of the grief process related to loss of perhaps years of social integration in society, family and meaningful occupation in the world due to the illness.
need to be as transparrent about these drugs and their side effects and the impact they will have on the patients instead of burying there heads in the sand by prescribing them to anyone and denying all responsability for their actions, these drugs are not parecetamol they hold much bigger consequences to people that have to deal with the side effects of taking them from day to day, also phyciatrists could do with not diagnosing people as scitzophrenics untill they have taken the time to get to know the patient and their stresses in life and indeed wether they have been sleeping at all and how much sleep they have missed. I find it alarming just how many phyciatrists leap to the worst concution after only spending 5 minutes with a patient attatching a terrible label and stigma often to people who have no such illness, this then in turn takes years to reverse as phyciatrist are often too defensive and arrogant to reverse that decition as it would leave them open to critisism or indeed legal action. Phyciatrists and gps alike need to grow up and take responsability for their attitude towards mental illness many gps and phyciatrists attitudes have not changed it seems since the forties. Many of them still fear the mentally ill and display arrogantly retarded attitudes towards their right to have a normal and complete life i have encountered one gp who could not stop repeating take your medication all your problems are in your head you must take your pills, the man was scared out of his mind and i had only gone to see him about a stomouche problem which after a second opinion was diagnosed as ibs syndrome i dint even get the chance to say anything before he started blurting out prejudiced remarks. people who suffer with breakdowns due to stress should not have to endure the extra stress of being diagnosed with a mental illness and then have to fight tooth and nail to get through to arrogant and dismissive stiff upper lip phyciatrists who seem to throw medication and wild assumtions at every problem in life rather than deal with the hard reality of making people well again. Stop handing these pills out like smarties and grow up. sly_mon2003@yahoo.co.uk