NHS baby deaths scandal: CQC officials 'threatened to sue to stop names being linked to alleged cover-up'
Charlie Cooper is Health Correspondent for The Independent, i, and The Independent on Sunday, writing on the NHS, medical advances, and international health. Since joining the papers as an editorial assistant, he has been nominated for young journalist of the year at both the Press Awards and the British Journalism Awards.
Tuesday 25 June 2013
Under-fire officials threatened to sue the Care Quality Commission in an eleventh-hour bid to stop their names being linked to an alleged cover-up, it emerged today.
An independent report that alleged a cover-up over regulation of a hospital where as many as 16 babies may have died due to substandard care, was published last week with the names of the officials involved redacted.
David Prior, the current chairman of the CQC, has now said that at least two of the four officials most closely connected with the alleged cover-up threatened to sue the NHS regulator if their names were published.
The names were only revealed following intense pressure from the health secretary Jeremy Hunt and an intervention from the Information Commissioner.
Four current and former CQC officials - including ex-chief executive Cynthia Bower and her deputy Jill Finney - were identifed in the independent report, produced by consultants Grant Thornton, as attending a meeting where an order was allegedly given to delete a damning internal report.
The cover-up allegations relate to the investigation of care failings at the Furness General Hospital, part of the Morecambe Bay NHS Trust.
Mr Prior did not say which of the four officials had threatened to sue.
CQC leaders said at the time that the decision not to publish names had been taken on the basis of legal advice that to do so would have been in breach of the Data Protection Act.
But speaking to the Health Service Journal (HSJ), Mr Prior admitted that that legal advice was given in the context of threats to sue from two of the officials who had been at the alleged "cover-up meeting".
He admitted to the HSJ: "We should have published and been damned."
Explaining the evenutal decision to publish the names he said: "Partly because of the Information Commissioner and partly because the level of public interest was so great we felt we ought to put the names out and take the legal risk we were running under the Data Protection Act," he said.
Yesterday, Cynthia Bower, who resigned from the CQC in February last year, told The Independent that she was "taking legal advice" on how to respond to the allegations against her, which she denies. Ms Finney, and the third official, CQC media manager Anna Jefferson, also deny being involved in any cover-up.
John Woodcock, Labour MP for Barrow and Furness, who has supported families of patients who died at the Furness General Hospital, said that the new leadership at the CQC - Mr Prior, as well as chief executive David Behan - needed to work harder to "flush out" a culture of secrecy at the regulator.
"They didn't get off to a good start by withholding the names and it was alarming that this damning internal review was not exposed even in the first round of interviews that Grant Thornton carried out at the CQC last year - which was under the new leadership," he told The Independent.
"It's important that the new leadership satisfies itself that there weren't people in the organisation who knew about the existence of the document but chose to keep it quiet. Because that's the kind of culture we need to flush out of all areas of the health service."
Yesterday, Sir David Nicholson, the outgoing head of NHS England, admitted to MPs that there was a culture of denial over complaints and concerns in the NHS.
Giving evidence to the public administration committee, he sad: "I do think there is a real issue about defensiveness and a lack of transparency in the way that we work."
Life & Style blogs
iPhone 6S price: new handset to cost the same, Apple unlikely to increase phones' storage
A daily walk 'can add seven years to your life'
Pansexual: What is it - and when did the word become popular?
Ashley Madison leak reveals Cambridge as the UK's cheating capital
What do the emojis on Snapchat mean?
- 1 VMAs 2015: Was Nicki Minaj and Miley Cyrus' awkward acceptance put-down real or staged?
- 2 If you're not already angry about the migrant crisis, here's a history lesson to remind you why you really should be
- 3 Rules on 5p plastic bags likely to lead to arguments at the check-out
- 4 Chaos breaks out in courtroom as father attacks killer of three-year-old daughter
- 5 Blood Moon and Supermoon: September to bring brightest – and dimmest – full Moon of the year on same night
£20000 - £30000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: This award-winning company, whi...
£40000 - £50000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: This is a unique & exciting opp...
£35000 - £45000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: You will be working with a 8 st...
£8000 - £12000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: A unique opportunity has arisen ...