Health & Families

Rain (AM and PM) 6° London Hi 10°C / Lo 3°C

NHS trust brushes off damning report into mother's death

Surgeon is criticised but GMC dismisses case

By Nina Lakhani

Mrs Beryl Walters who died after surgery

Mrs Beryl Walters who died after surgery

An NHS trust faces possible legal action following its partial rejection of a damning report into the care of a woman who died after an operation at Glenfield Hospital in Leicester.

Beryl Walters, 68, died in July 1998, 28 days after her windpipe was accidentally cut during an operation to her throat for the removal of a small tumour; she had been expected to make a full recovery.

Her surgeon, Mr Andrew Hall, was criticised after a detailed investigation by the Health Ombudsman into his procedures.

Following her death, Mrs Walter's daughter, Susan George, complained about the surgeon to the University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust which later rejected parts of the Ombudsman's findings, particularly that the outcome could have been different.

Lawyers have advised Mrs George that an ombudsman's findings can only be disputed through the courts and that the trust should not have rejected parts of the report.

Her action against the trust follows a decision by the General Medical Council (GMC) to dismiss a disciplinary hearing against the surgeon on a "procedural technicality", leaving her with little hope of further inquiries.

Lawyers have asked the trust to refer Mr Hall to the National Patient Safety Agency (NPSA) for assessment.

John Halford, partner at the law firm Bindmans, which is acting pro bono for Mrs George, said: "This sad case shows that, some four and a half years after the Shipman Inquiry was decommissioned, the GMC remains a body that does not command patient confidence even when grappling with serious questions about doctors' performance that are raised by respected, independent bodies like the NHS Ombudsman.

"Worse still, in this case the NHS Trust, which the ombudsman is specifically empowered to investigate, itself rejected key findings on a highly questionable basis. We are waiting to see whether the trust will belatedly take steps to assuage Mrs George's concerns including involving the NPSA. In short, we have a system where the response to the most serious of patient concerns can very easily become a macabre game of pass the parcel."

The GMC referred Mr Hall for a fitness-to-practice hearing in 2004 after the Health Ombudsman criticised him for using inappropriate surgical techniques, failing to get proper informed consent, and failing to seek specialist advice when Mrs Walters developed complications – from which, ultimately, she died. The case was dismissed in October 2008, days before the hearing was scheduled to start.

Peter Walsh, head of Action Against Medical Accidents, said: "Here we have a situation where it is the GMC's own arcane rules which have prevented them from focusing on their main role of protecting the public."

Dr Peter Wilmshurst, a cardiologist at the Royal Shrewsbury Hospital who has written extensively about the GMC, said: "The GMC has a difficult job dealing with so many complaints, which it is not doing very well. It... is run by amateurs rather than legal experts. It needs a complete overhaul so that disciplinary matters are considered by a completely independent body."

The GMC denied any wrongdoing and said the case was "concluded on the grounds of lack of jurisdiction".

A spokesperson at the University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust said: "We continue to be confident in Mr Andrew Hall's performance and clinical competence. The case has also been seen by the Health Ombudsman and the GMC and neither found that further action against Mr Hall was necessary. We are sorry that despite all of this Mrs George doesn't feel any closure."

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

"Mother's death"
[info]4215christine wrote:
Sunday, 31 May 2009 at 10:07 pm (UTC)

I thought this article would be about a death in childbirth. If 'pensioner' (she was 68) doesn't seem right, why not opt for 'woman'. Nobody should die in these circumstances. I am full of admiration for the daughter who has been contesting this for the last ten years.
Justice delayed
[info]azphil wrote:
Sunday, 31 May 2009 at 10:31 pm (UTC)
The old saying is that "Justice Delayed, is justice denied". To have to battle for ten years and still not get justice is a crime. The GMC is a sad joke and everyone knows it. I mean, they don't have jurisdiction in this case. Well if they don't who does?
GMC should be scrapped
[info]mind_ful wrote:
Monday, 1 June 2009 at 07:13 am (UTC)
Why do doctors regulate themselves when people die? surely this is a charge of manslaughter and should be seen as such and treated as a potential crime. What power is it that allows the medical profession to be above the law in these situations? THe GMC should be scrapped. Patients should be able to bring actions to court as with any other crime charge. As it is doctors pretty much do what they like and protect each other through having no external controls placed on them. Disgusting.
[info]jorgec wrote:
Monday, 1 June 2009 at 08:34 am (UTC)
The NHS is extremely reluctant to be held accountable for its mistakes. Those who try to ensure that it takes responsibility are put under immense pressure by the system. Every attempt is made to 'pass the buck' of responsibility back to the person making the claim. Good Luck to Mrs George.
The entire governmental system needs to take responsibility for its mistakes, not just a few pathetic Politicians who have fiddled their expenses.


Free gym pass

Get fit for summer with Fitness First gyms in London

Download a free gym pass from Fitness First today

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date