Now 7,000 more women drawn into toxic breast implant scandal
Standfirst in 15pt Mexican border town notorious for its vicious Name Names
Jeremy Laurance is a writer on health issues. He is former health editor of The Independent and the i and has covered the specialism for more than 20 years. He thinks the harm medicine does is under-appreciated, the harm it prevents over-rated, and that cycling works better than most drugs. He was named Specialist Journalist of the Year in the 2011 British Press Awards.
Friday 16 March 2012
Up to 7,000 more women than previously thought may have been fitted with potentially defective PIP breast implants in the UK, the Department of Health announced yesterday.
It brings to 47,000 the total number of women who are thought to be at risk from non-medical grade silicone used in their manufacture.
There are fears the substandard silicone, intended for use in mattresses, could lead to increased rupture rates, causing inflammation and injury. But official advice in the UK is that there is no evidence rupture rates are higher than with other implants.
The additional women were identified after investigations that indicated the French company at the centre of the scandal, Poly Implant Prothese (PIP), may have been using non-medical grade silicone in its products for longer than suspected. The French authorities had originally suggested that only implants made since 2001 were affected. But after inquiries by the UK regulator, the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, the French authorities admitted implants made before 2001 were also suspect.
Simultaneous announcements about the new threat were made in Britain and Holland yesterday, but it is understood no announcement was made in France.
According to the Department of Health, about one in five breast implants routinely need replacing within 10 years, regardless of their make. It is therefore unlikely that all 7,000 extra women still have the implants in place. In January, an expert group led by the NHS medical director Sir Bruce Keogh advised that there was no need for women to seek routine removal of the implants, which would require them to have a risky operation.
But it said women who were concerned could seek an appointment with their GP and, if they were not reassured, could have them removed.
Private clinics were told they had a "moral duty" to remove implants they had placed, but the Health Department said where they refused, or the clinics had closed, women could seek treatment on the NHS. So far, GPs have referred for NHS care, including a scan, 4,534 women who were treated privately; 224 of those women have opted to have their implants removed.
Health Secretary Andrew Lansley said: "I want to reassure those affected by the news today that they will be provided with all the help they need from the NHS."
Life & Style blogs
Coachella Festival 2015: from Kendall Jenner to Alexa Chung, stars and festival-goers parade their boho best
What do the emoji on Snapchat mean?
A bottle of wine a day is not bad for you and abstaining is worse than drinking, scientist claims
The busiest Starbucks in the US is also the most secretive - it's where the CIA gets its coffee fix
'Game-changing' new way to fight cancer discovered
- 1 BBC election debate: The one photo that summed up the whole 90-minute leaders debate
- 2 A bottle of wine a day is not bad for you and abstaining is worse than drinking, scientist claims
- 3 18th century sex toy found in 'toilet of sword fighting school' in Poland
- 4 'I wish my teacher knew...': Young students share their 'heartbreaking' worries in notes
£30000 - £40000 per annum + Benefits: Ashdown Group: Front-End UI Application ...
£18000 - £26000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: They work with major vehicle ma...
£27000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: Domestic Service Only Engineers are requ...
£23600 - £27500 per annum: Recruitment Genius: The Employability Service withi...