Health & Families

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 6° London Hi 9°C / Lo 6°C

Obese teenagers carry same risk as smoking 10 cigarettes a day

Chance of early death from preventable diseases high for overweight adolescents

By Steve Connor, Science Editor

Being obese at 18 increases the risk of early death by a third, says the report

Alamy

Being obese at 18 increases the risk of early death by a third, says the report

Overweight teenagers run the same risk of an early death as people who smoke regularly – and the risk increases substantially with very fat adolescents.

Teenagers who are clinically obese have the same risk of premature death as someone who smokes more than 10 cigarettes a day. An investigation of 45,000 men whose health was monitored for 38 years has found that being overweight at the age of 18 is equivalent to being a regular smoker in terms of the overall risk of dying relatively early in life from preventable diseases.

Men who both smoked and were overweight as teenagers were likely to die even earlier than those who fell into just one or other of the risk groups. But the study did not find any evidence to suggest that smoking and obesity combined to produce even greater risks when found together.

Martin Neovius of the Karolinksa Institute in Stockholm, who carried out the study published in the British Medical Journal, said: "It shows the importance of measures to reduce obesity in adolescents. A lot of people are dying from preventable deaths.

"I think we should be looking at what we can learn from the anti-tobacco campaign in terms of obesity. There are some who argue that being overweight – but not clinically obese – is harmless. No, it is not harmless because we found that a being an overweight adolescent is equivalent to smoking up to 10 cigarettes a day."

Overweight is defined as having a body mass index – a measure of body fat based on height and weight – of between 25 and 30, whereas being obese is defined as having a BMI of more than 30. Being overweight at 18 increased the risk of an early death by just more than a third, while being obese more than doubled the risk. The risk of premature death also increased with the number of cigarettes smoked, with heavy smokers at more than double the risk of dying relatively early in life compared to non-smokers.

The study also found that men who were seriously underweight at 18 also had a higher risk of a premature death and this risk also increased with the number of cigarettes they smoked.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Why?
[info]itj wrote:
Wednesday, 25 February 2009 at 04:42 am (UTC)
Why are we constantly allowing ourselves to be brow beaten by these people who have only a self centred interest in maintaining their grant/funding, if I want to smoke, it's my choice, if I want to be over weight, it's my choice, if I want to dance naked by moonlight in sub zero temperatures, it's my choice.

To these busy bodies I only have one thing really to say BUTT OUT OF MY LIFE!
Re: Why?
[info]matt13 wrote:
Wednesday, 25 February 2009 at 10:25 am (UTC)
They aren't telling you what to do. But they are informing you of the consequences.
Re: Why?
[info]itj wrote:
Wednesday, 25 February 2009 at 10:56 am (UTC)
Strange though it may seem I know the consequences of my action and am fully able to make rational decisions and choices on my own life style. When you are constantly nagged and badgered, that is not informing you of the consequences, that is attempting to manipulate the outcome, and one of the more unacceptable forms of social engineering used by this government, the reason they aim these "programmes" at children is because they are the easiest to "indoctrinate", ask Goebbels, ask any authoritarian state how you alter the course of public opinion, you start with the children. When this is used to encourage Green Issues and recycling we all rightly applaud, but these are issues aimed at the good of the planet and mankind as a whole, but I would contend that attempting to manipulate public behaviour for the simple expedient of reducing the healthcare budget is wrong and immoral
Re: Why?
[info]matt13 wrote:
Wednesday, 25 February 2009 at 11:05 am (UTC)
Then blame the media for the constant nagging and badgering.

Almost one in four adults in the UK is overweight, so I think the issue affects us as a whole anyway. I'd rather the population was healthier, the country would be more productive and the money saved on healthcare could be spent on something else.
after all this hot air..
[info]tommytcg wrote:
Wednesday, 25 February 2009 at 06:07 am (UTC)
they have not told you obesity`s causess. Why? Either they dont know, or else it is another profitable route for Big Pharma to apply newly developed drugs for a non-disease. Surely the solution is to eliminate the causes of obesity, for in reality, is it not these causes that cause the health problems? The advice should have been.. Stop eating ANY sugars and fructose syrup. These trigger a massive insulin release. Grains, especially refined, need to be reduced to an absolute minumum, as they ALL contain plant chemicals, lectins, that desinsitise cell membranes to insulin, causing insulin overproduction. Grains also contain plant hormones, leptins, that interfere with liver to pancreas signalling, to disturb insulin release. All cause obesity and have diabetes risk. All carbs, especially high glycaemic, cause obesity, and must be reduced. Aspartame, MSG, anti-depressants and BP medications also have had obesity pathways identified. Fat and calories do not cause obesity. (check out the Krebs cycle in your Physiology notes).- All this talk of premature death, without giving sensible scientific advice means little. Maybe the science writer of this article will go and study a little more science before posting these scare studies.
Re: after all this hot air..
[info]tommytcg wrote:
Wednesday, 25 February 2009 at 06:39 am (UTC)
I almost forgot, I must be the resting phase for the intellectual biorhythm. Phyto-oestrogens in soy, (plant hormones that mimick human female hormone) interfere with thyroid function and are also a cause of obesity. Soy has 9 other toxic qualities and should NOT be consumed on human or animal. http://www.westonaprice.org/soy/index.html, for a re-education on soy, the non-food.
Re: after all this hot air..
[info]natnutrition wrote:
Wednesday, 25 February 2009 at 01:07 pm (UTC)
Great advice. If you really want turbo-charged health then I would add try making raw plant food your staple (main food group) Eat a salad everyday, because:
1.) you can eat as much of it as you want. No one got fat eating too much salad.
2.) a good range of leafy veg, fruits and sea vegetables (Eg., Wakame, Arame) will provide all the vits and mins your body needs and in the form you're best suited to absorb them.
Try it - the pounds will fall off, you'll have much more energy, improved skin tone, easier motion etc etc etc
Re: after all this hot air..
[info]phattie54 wrote:
Wednesday, 25 February 2009 at 10:43 am (UTC)
Thankyou for putting this in a nut shell. This is the clearest advice I have ever read or received.
Re: after all this hot air..
[info]rants_a_lot wrote:
Wednesday, 25 February 2009 at 12:45 pm (UTC)
Really, I thought it was caused by people being lazy, greedy slobs.
Re: after all this hot air..
[info]goosegreece wrote:
Wednesday, 25 February 2009 at 06:45 pm (UTC)
You forgot to mention stupid.
[info]cherielabombe wrote:
Wednesday, 25 February 2009 at 08:08 am (UTC)
Ugh.... article aside could we really stop with the headless fatties already?
UGH.
[info]cherielabombe wrote:
Wednesday, 25 February 2009 at 08:08 am (UTC)
Article aside, could we stop with the headless fatties already?
Re: UGH.
[info]cherielabombe wrote:
Wednesday, 25 February 2009 at 01:45 pm (UTC)
You're right. Because everyone who eats ice cream is fat, and everyone who doesn't is thin.

*sigh*
Re: UGH.
[info]benson321 wrote:
Thursday, 26 February 2009 at 12:31 pm (UTC)
to the extent that she obviously enjoys her ice-cream to, yes those people are all fat.
Quite Simple
[info]benson321 wrote:
Wednesday, 25 February 2009 at 09:21 am (UTC)
Someone take the ice-cream away from her, job done.
And the alternative
[info]washmyworld wrote:
Wednesday, 25 February 2009 at 11:48 am (UTC)
And the alternative from dying of a "preventable" death is to live until you're 100, lose your marbles, become incontinent and put strain on another area of the NHS by needing constant care... I certainly know which I would prefer
how should you look at it
[info]lilfoa wrote:
Wednesday, 25 February 2009 at 11:59 am (UTC)
I read the article and it's good for our awareness. I think it's what media should do instead of giving blomes constantly to them by them being only targeting teenagers because they are easy to target. somehow they are obligated to tell us what instead should we do if we can't smoke or have fat in our body but then that an extra job to them. I think what's important here is to know the consquences of everything you eat, drink and smoke. guys you shouldn't be offended by this articles , it is telling the truth so just be aware. be aware of your health as you're a teenager now , better now than later. always remember that .
the dangers of BMI readings
[info]nathbahrain11 wrote:
Wednesday, 25 February 2009 at 01:08 pm (UTC)
I think bodyfat % reading is a lot more accurate in terms of looking at health. In 2 extremes you have all international rugby players who are over 30 (high BMI) and have low levels of bodyfat (10%), obese and unhealthy? not at all. At the other end of the scale you have supermodels who are 18 (low BMI) but with high levels of Bodyfat (over 30%), unhealthy? definately.

The key factor that any figures regarding weight and its relationship with health is lean muscle tissue. some people can walk around at a BMI of 21 all their lives thinking they are healthy when they are not, i think this is a huge problem in todays fast food world, especially in females.

Nathan williams
[info]uanime5 wrote:
Wednesday, 25 February 2009 at 02:44 pm (UTC)
The sooner we introduce the traffic light system so everyone will know just how fatty and sugary our food is the better.
fat teenagers
[info]rerabrerab wrote:
Wednesday, 25 February 2009 at 06:22 pm (UTC)
The up side to this is that fat women find it much more difficult to get pregant - so hopefully teenage pregnancy rates are falling as they overeat.
[info]ezekielee wrote:
Saturday, 28 February 2009 at 10:30 pm (UTC)
They couldn't even spell Karolinska Institute properly, how many other mistakes are in this press release of non-news?
Wow
[info]plyometrics wrote:
Monday, 3 August 2009 at 04:34 pm (UTC)
That is really not that big of a surprise seeing as how most people are now dying from obesity related causes. We really some exercises to lose fat and a good workout routine for these teens.

Most popular in Life & Style


Free gym pass

Get fit for summer with Fitness First gyms in London

Download a free gym pass from Fitness First today

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date