Smokers who stop abruptly rather than cutting down gradually over time are more successful, a new study has found.
Those with the willpower to go cold turkey are 25 per cent more successful at quitting than those who wind down the habit gradually according to researchers from Oxford University.
The study funded by the British Heart Foundation involved 697 smokers who had decided to stop. The group was split into two, with one asked to quit on a given day. The other was also set a quit day, but gradually reduced their tobacco use two weeks prior to the date.
Each group was given advice and support, as well as access to cessation tools such as nicotine patches, gum or mouth spray.
When the participants were revisited a month after their quit day, 50 per cent of those who stopped abruptly were still not smoking compared with 39 per cent of those who did so gradually. Therefore, those who went cold turkey were 25 per cent more likely to be successful.
13 ways to help prevent cancer
13 ways to help prevent cancer
Stopping smoking. This notoriously difficult habit to break sees tar build-up in the lungs and DNA alteration and causes 15,558 cancer deaths a year
Avoiding the sun, and the melanoma that comes with overexposure to harmful UV rays, could help conscientious shade-lovers dodge being one of the 7,220 people who die from it
A diet that is low in red meat can help to prevent bowel cancer, according to the research - with 30 grams a day recommended for men, and 25 a day recommended for women
Foods high in fibre, meanwhile, can further make for healthier bowels. Processed foods in developed countries appear to be causing higher rates of colon cancer than diets in continents such as Africa, which have high bean and pulse intakes
Two servings of fruit and three servings of vegetables a day were given as the magic number for good diet in the research. Overall, diet causes only slightly fewer cancer deaths than sun exposure in Australia, at 7,000 a year
Obesity and being overweight, linked to poor diet and lack of exercise, causes 3,917 deaths by cancer a year on its own
2007 Getty Images
Dying of a cancer caused by infection also comes in highly, linked to 3,421 cancer deaths a year. Infections such as human papilloma virus - which can cause cervical cancer in women - and hepatitis - can be prevented by vaccinations and having regular check-ups
Cutting back on drinks could reduce the risk of cancers caused by alcohol - such as liver cancer, bowel cancer, breast cancer and mouth cancer - that are leading to 3,208 deaths a year
2014 Getty Images
Sitting around and not getting the heart pumping - less than one hour's exercise a day - is directly leading to about 1,800 people having lower immune functions and higher hormone levels, among other factors, that cause cancers
2011 Getty Images
Hormone replacement therapy, which is used to relieve symptoms of the menopause in women, caused 539 deaths from (mainly breast) cancer in Australia last year. It did, however, prevent 52 cases of colorectal cancers
2003 Getty Images
Insufficient breastfeeding, bizarrely, makes the top 10. Breastfeeding for 12 months could prevent 235 cancer cases a year, said the research
Oral contraceptives, like the Pill, caused about 105 breast cancers and 52 cervical cancers - but it also prevented about 1,440 ovarian and uterine (womb) cases of cancer last year
2006 Getty Images
Taking aspirin also prevented 232 cases in the Queensland research of colorectal and oesophagal cancers - but as it can also cause strokes, is not yet recommended as a formal treatment against the risk of cancer
Dr Nicola Lindson-Hawley, from Oxford University who lead the study said: "The difference in quit attempts seemed to arise because people struggled to cut down.
"It provided them with an extra thing to do, which may have put them off quitting altogether. If people actually made a quit attempt then the success rate was equal across groups.
"We also found that more people preferred the idea of quitting gradually than abruptly; however regardless of what they thought they were still more likely to quit in the abrupt group."
The difference between the two groups was clear from the start, as more of the cold turkey quitters were able to stave of smoking for at least 24 hours than those in the other group.
However, smokers who find it “quite impossible” to quit should try to cut down slowly rather than simply give up, advised Dr Lindson-Hawley.
"For these people it is much better to attempt to cut down their smoking than do nothing at all and we should increase support for gradual cessation to increase their chances of succeeding," she said.
The research is reported in the journal Annals of Internal Medicine.
Dr John Hughes of the University of Vermont in Burlington, commented on the study that those who cut down are often more addicted and have failed with the cold turkey method before.
He told Reuters: "The decision to quit for most smokers is a sudden one, that often occurs because something happens to motivate them.”
"With abrupt cessation, they can act on the decision to quit immediately, while still highly motivated (in fact half of smokers quit on the same day they decide to quit)."
Additional reporting by PAReuse content