Rationing babies: IVF is still a postcode lottery
Childless couples suffer in UK's 'unfair and unjust' system
The true extent of the postcode lottery that blights the chances of IVF treatment for thousands of couples in Britain is revealed here for the first time. New data gathered from primary care trusts (PCTs) throughout the UK shows starkly that where you live determines your chance of getting infertility treatment on the NHS.
Childless couples in Scotland, where almost all PCTs routinely offer three cycles of IVF treatment – the nationally recommended level of treatment likely to result in successful conception – stand the best chances of pregnancy. Elsewhere in the UK, however, the picture for would-be parents is bleak, according to research by the charity Infertility Network UK.
PCTs in Wales, Northern Ireland and most of England offer just one cycle of IVF – far short of the three recommended by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (Nice) five years ago – the charity says. It warns that many trusts frequently have strings attached to IVF that bar people unless they fit into narrow restrictions, such as age limits, weight, and bans on couples who smoke or who are not in a stable relationship.
The failure of most PCTs to provide adequate treatment for thousands of childless couples came under fire last night in a scathing attack by medical experts and politicians on the Government's failure to honour its pledge, made in 2004, that couples would be given three cycles of IVF treatment.
Norman Lamb, the Liberal Democrat health spokesman, said: "The postcode lottery is alive and kicking and is impossible to justify given the absolute clarity of guidelines on IVF. It is scandalous that so many PCTs are flouting the guidelines and... making a mockery of them in the process." He added that health trusts needed to be held to account and "exposed for their failure".
The current situation is unacceptable, according to Dr Allan Pacey, secretary of the British Fertility Society: "Five years is long enough for people to wait for the Nice guidelines to be implemented, and it's a disgrace that they still haven't been. If this had happened with other aspects of healthcare... there'd have been a major scandal."
The "unfair and unjust" system of treatment is resulting in thousands of couples being denied treatment that could help them have children, said Clare Lewis-Jones, head of Infertility Network UK, which has launched the www.fundingforfertility.com website to help people know what their situation is. "Sadly, access to NHS funding for fertility treatment is still a postcode lottery – right across the UK," she said. "This is affecting the lives of thousands of people – one in six couples seek treatment."
Health bosses are coming under increasing pressure to offer greater IVF treatment on the NHS, and there are signs of improvement in some areas, notably eastern England, which last week announced that from this month patients will be able to get up to three cycles.
Campaigners claim the criteria used to decide who qualifies for help need to be standardised. "It is the criteria to access treatment that varies enormously. It... leads to huge confusion and is basically unfair," said Ms Lewis-Jones.
Last year the Expert Group on Commissioning NHS Infertility Provision called on PCTs to make IVF treatment a higher priority. Next month, the health minister Dawn Primarolo is expected to launch a new guide to best practice, to encourage NHS commissioners to fully implement the Nice guidelines.
Almost 45,000 cycles of IVF are performed in Britain each year, but the shortage of NHS treatment means that around three-quarters have to resort to expensive private treatment.
A Department of Health spokesperson said last night: "Local variations in the provision of IVF cause distress to many childless couples," but insisted that there had been "significant improvements".
The lucky few: two families and their fight for treatment
The Powrie family, Gloucester
Lucy Powrie was able to get her IVF treatment funded by the NHS. "We weren't quite sure if we were going to get funding; we moved down from Scotland in July 2006 and we would have got three funded cycles up there. I was expecting a fight, but we were relieved when we were told we'd have one funded cycle."
Mrs Powrie was lucky. The 33-year-old fell pregnant after one IVF cycle in 2007. "People need to understand the pain that infertility brings with it, it's a huge loss, almost like bereavement, and to have got the funding and to have got Isaac was so wonderful," she said.
"I do feel very lucky, but it's not fair that some people have access to funded treatment... It does come down to desperation for some people who will even consider moving home to an area where there is NHS-funded treatment."
The Dawson family, Bracknell
Nicola Dawson, 35, was told she did not qualify for treatment because she was too young and had already had private treatment. "We found out that our primary care trust had added extra criteria on top of the Nice guidelines, which rendered us ineligible for treatment. We were lucky that we were able to borrow money to pay for private treatment, but it must be heartbreaking for people who are not able to have a child because they cannot afford to have treatment that they should be getting on the NHS in the first place," she said.
"Infertility is absolutely devastating. It really kicks you when you are down at your lowest ebb to then have somebody turn round and tell you that because you happen to live in a certain area, you can't have the treatment... I was very upset and angry about it all."
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited






Comments
i'm devastated to read all this stuff- if they really value children for their own sakes rather than just as genetic playthings and/or social trophies there are umpteen other ways for them to really do some good for society as a whole instead of expecting society to play father xmas for them ( sorry re all those hurt feelings out there but you may not have noticed that the UK lifelong free party with unlimited goodybags of choice at the door, courtesy of taxpayers mlked dry is OVER! )
The article mentions infertility network uk, they have a forum to share unhelpful comments from well meaning people, maybe what we do neeed is just more awareness and educating people who don't experience infertility so they can at least empathise and begin to understand to be able to lose some of the judgmental and arrogant assumptions you suggest
Tricia
almost anything can be classed as an illness (remember, actually having children, albeit illegitimate ones, was once enough to land a woman in a mental hospital for life) and if childlessness is an illness ( poor eggs, blocked tubes, inadequate womb, dud sperm, mental stress, etc, as well as just plain bad luck )then it seems all the more odd to create children simply as a cure for ill adults, children who might even inherit some of those problems themselves?;
civilisation is supposed to raise us up above basic,inevitably selfish, survival instincts- we are supposed to learn to value the common good, as many lesser species do when they pool childrearing in harsh environments- and ours is going to get very harsh indeed, quite soon
The suspicion must exist that with IVF that you are passing the same problem on to future generations.
I thank you
Firozali A.Mulla.
I would also maintain that knee replacements, hip replacements and even bone-setting after a fracture aren't 'life threatening', but we wouldn't hesitate to say that someone who needed such treatments should get them on the NHS.
I agree with Sadie24 - if you have nothing constructive to contribute to this debate, then you should maintain your silence. Couples who go through the pain of not having children have quite enough to bear.
Having a child is a basic yearning of most men and women as for calling it a luxury treatment i can assure you 6 weeks or more of injecting yourself is not a pleasure. IVF is emotionally draining and no one does it out of choice.
I hope that no one is your family ever experiences infertility as i certainly wouldn't want a mum, dad, aunt or uncles with such views as the support would not be available.
i have experience infertility for almost 12 years and i wish people who don't understand the full impact of infertility would not comment of something they have no understand of.