Health & Families

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 15° London Hi 15°C / Lo 8°C

Six new rights for every NHS patient

Private treatment will be paid for by hospitals which break treatment targets

By Andrew Grice, Political Editor

Patients will today be promised six new rights to NHS treatment as the Government attempts to push through a new raft of public service reforms in the run-up to the forthcoming general election.

Gordon Brown will promise to scrap unpopular centrally-imposed NHS targets as he unveils a national prospectus seen as critical to his attempts to restore his authority and fight back against the Conservatives.

His Budget-style document, Building Britain's Future, will extend a consumer-driven approach to public services and include new measures to revive the economy. There will be more money for house-building by councils and housing associations, who will give greater priority to local people in order to prevent newcomers to an area from jumping the queue.

In an interview with The Independent yesterday, the Health Secretary Andy Burnham disclosed that the new "entitlements" for patients would include a right to:

*An operation within 18 weeks of patients first seeing their GP

*A free health check-up for all at the age of 40

*Treatment from an NHS dentist

*Die at home if they suffer from a long-term medical condition

*See a cancer specialist within two weeks

*Be treated in accident & emergency departments within four hours.

Although patients would not be able to sue the NHS for not providing these guaranteed services, Primary Care Trusts would be forced to send people to a hospital in another area or, in extreme cases, for private treatment if they cannot deliver it in NHS facilities.

Some of the entitlements, such as the 18-week limit for operations, are currently among the targets set by Whitehall for NHS managers.

Ministers will sweep away these targets and put patients in the driving seat by ensuring they know and demand their basic rights. Targets to be axed include a 26-week maximum wait for in-patient treatment.

A plethora of data collection, form-filling and box-ticking will be abolished later this year after a review by the NHS National Quality Board.

Clinicians willbehandedmore freedom to run their own budgets and to play a role inmanaging the service, breaking down the traditional divide between them and managers. Mr Burnham conceded that, with waiting-list problems addressed, targets had become a “millstone” and had to be lifted. The best elements of the targets system would now become “permanent service standards” to entrench the progress made in recent years. “The pressure for continuing improvements will come from patients, not politicians; that is a fundamental change,” he said.

In the interview, the Health Secretary denied that a squeeze on public spending would put the new patients’ rights in jeopardy, but stopped short of his previous promise that the NHS budget would continue to grow after 2011 – which the Treasury refused to endorse. “I can’t do Alistair Darling’s job for him,” he said. “What I would say is just look at our record. Labour has always looked after the NHS. It has been our priority and will continue to be our priority.” He admitted that annual growth in NHS spending is set to slow.

“The catch-up [with the EU average] has been done. It is now a case of maintaining what we have done.”

Mr Burnham added: “The NHS cannot be seen to be protected and immune from the pressures that other public services are facing.”

He promised a major switch of resources to preventing ill-health. “It has been fringe; it needs to become mainstream,” he said. The NHS would need to become smarter in order to meet pressures such as new treatments and a rising elderly population. In the long term, it would face “tough questions” such as whether to switch resources away from the acute sector.

He denied that the new rights would be demanded by the pushy middle classes rather than by those relying most on services.“We have got to be good at telling people what they can expect,” he said.

Mr Burnham’s comments come at the start of the annual British Medical Association conference in Liverpool, which yesterday released details of a poll claiming nine out of 10 people fear that NHS services will be cut as a result of the recession. The survey found 89 per cent fear waiting times for treatment will increase, while 85 per cent think there will be more charges for NHS treatments. But only four out of 10 would also be willing to pay more taxes to protect growth in NHS funding.

BMA chairman, Dr Hamish Meldrum, said: “These results show how anxious the public is about the effects of the recession on the health service.

While we appreciate that the Governmentneeds to steer the country through this difficult economic period, we urge it not to do so at the expense of NHS funding.”

In a progress report a year after his NHS review, Lord Darzi of Denham, the surgeon who is Junior Health Minister, will say tomorrow: “Quality is the thread that is being stitched into the very fabric of the NHS.”

Mr Brown will focus heavily on “bread-and-butter issues” such as public services as he relaunches his premiership. In a Commons statement this afternoon, he will also outline the draft legislative programme for the Queen’s Speech in November, the last before the general election.

Yesterday the Tories accused Labour of covering up the need for public spending cuts amid growing signs that the Treasury would delay the next government- wide spending review until after the election.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

Brown desperate to come up with something.
[info]dave1234567890 wrote:
Sunday, 28 June 2009 at 11:52 pm (UTC)
These are the final twitchings of this already dead government. Nobody is listening any more and nobody believes a word they say or the promises they might make. Too many lies have lead to total loss of trust in this government and this Prime Minister. The electorate are just waiting for the chance to drive this totally incompetent and lying government into oblivion.
Re: Brown desperate to come up with something.
[info]drahcir38 wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 12:20 pm (UTC)
And replace them with?
Is this new?
[info]tyke_helen wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 12:11 am (UTC)
1, 4, 5 and 6 are already the rights of any NHS patient. The only problem is that GPs never tell anyone. I'm so glad that they are abolishing the 26 week maximum wait for inpatient treatment. It is so very relevant when patients have to be treated within 18 days of their referral for their GP. How do the government manage to get away with saying that all of this is new???
Window dressing
[info]libertyandtruth wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 05:51 am (UTC)
These measures are little more than window dressing.

Worse, you have to recall the mindset of the government which caused these measures to come into being in the first place - it hasn't gone way. So you can be sure that should Labour regain power at the next election, these changes will disappear and we'll return to insane legislation.

You'd have to be mad to vote Labour.
LIES, LIES AND MORE LIES
[info]georgesign wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 06:54 am (UTC)
Once again politicians think the taxpayer is stupid. When will they get it into their collective heads that I for one would not vote for any of this corrupt bunch. MP now stands for Mug the People
Chief executive culture is protected by this government
[info]suffbeach wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 07:21 am (UTC)
Out in Suffolk, where we had a warning letter issued by the Healthcare Commission in 2007 regarding dangerously poor complaint handling and the bullying of patients who raised concerns and there has and still is a real problem with complaint handling. Nothing will change, the cover up culture is very skilled regarding complaints up to PALS or complaints to our very vastly over paid chief executive. Should they wish to hide anything they will. Lots of people totally rely in accident and emergency for basic care, due to a longstanding bypass pattern in the area, in direct contrast to adjoining areas where parents have great GP practices which get high scores for excellence when the public are consulted. Complaining about for instance about lack of test results, lack of referral will go nowhere as it is in the interest of henchman style teams to keep a lid on things as much as possible. As for seeing an NHS dentist, our local council has cut all public transport making it impossible to reach the hospital, the dentist or any useful service without a car. The NHS knows that some families in my area have waited 8 years to try and be allowed to sign on in the nearest town 10 miles away. Community apathy is in place on a widescale as each near miss or worse which takes place in our community with no action taken makes people more reluctant to come forward.




None of these proposals will do anything until we

1) get rid of chief executives who are put in place to asset strip and shut the public up.
2) Patient dignity is seen as normal
3) Access to basic services is seen as normal
4) Complaint handling is not seen as a nuisance - but rather something which could save money for essential services and lives.
5) GP's and Consultants can safely raise concerns on their patch without an overbearing chief executive ruining their career.
6) It is noted that a proportion of people are dying of advanced conditions have never been referred to anybody.

This chicken government is running for the hills just like the last shower in power when it comes to powerful defence unions, and the GMC. The DOH formal complaint system eats up valuable cash that could be used by the medical profession - too many over paid box tickers under the leadership of corrupt chief exectutives.

[info]mr_scummy wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 07:59 am (UTC)
I suspect these "rights", like an operation within 18 weeks of seeing your GP, will only lead to NHS managers and politicians finding new and creative ways of fiddling the figures to give the desired outcome.

Just get the basics right before indulging in yet more rights, targets etc.
[info]rhinocircus wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 08:03 am (UTC)
" . . . as the Government attempts to push through a new raft of public service reforms in the run-up to the forthcoming general election".

But does not say that, the reforms will be in place and practice before the election--jam tomorrow, maybe?

libertyandtruth says:

"You'd have to be mad to vote Labour". Partially right . . .

If you are not a cynic by the time you reach 20yrs today, you're retarded. Voting in the UK is a charade--the game is the same--only the players change. NewLabourConservativeLiberal--like congealed fat you try to swim in.

When did a political manifesto clearly convey the wishes and priorities of the people?

Education - Health Services - Housing - Pensions - Personal Liberties--all have plummeted while the talk goes on, as you vote for a pig-in-a-poke.
Bull
[info]rendevou5 wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 08:34 am (UTC)
Before this bull-talking Government introduces new empty promises it will never deliver, it ought to explain why it hasn't fulfilled the promises it already has failed to deliver.

Where are the single sex wards Blair guaranteed in 1997?
What about disabled children's right to have their needs law-abidingly assessed?
[info]cronyblatcher wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 08:37 am (UTC)
The need for a legislative solution is proven by the fact of the Balls private members bill (which was dumped to qualify for promotion). The banana republic of Britain must be only state outside of darkest Africa where children do not have such a right in law. the only State in which boob n bottom and erectile dysfunction jobs have a higher spending priority than disabled children's health.
Re: What about disabled children's right to have their needs law-abidingly assessed?
[info]cronyblatcher wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 08:55 am (UTC)
For avoidance of doubt, the need for legislative intervention is driven by the fact of cerebral prostitutes as judges, who calmly ignore the fact that UNCRC was (evidently fraudulently) ratified.
In the accepted heirarchy of treaty terminology, a State's undertaking to "ensure" a right denotes the highest possible of obligation - it requires more than mere non interference with a designated right and requires the State party the treaty to execute positive measures, legislative administrative judicial and otherwise as necessary, to make sure the specified right can be effectively exercised. The word "ensure" is used 32 times in the substantive body of the on the children's rights and is not mitigated or derogated in any way.
Article 43 of UNCRC set up a Committee on the Rights of the Child that the sole authoritive reference source. That Committee in its eighth session heavily criticised Britain for not implementing many aspects of the Treaty.
In report "Concluding Observations of the Committee on the of the Child Concerning UK NI", the Committee found that Britain is in violation of the Treaty.
"In this the Committee observes in particular that the principal for the best interest of the child appears not to be
in legislation in such areas as *health, education, and social security*, which have a bearing on the respect
the rights of the child."
The fact of that finding of non compliance being unchanged at this date, is corroborated the utterances of all 4 of the the deliberately toothless British Children's Commissioners.

Against that background, the routine trampling underfoot of children's rights is aided and abetted by cerebral prostitutes who are appointed as 'safe' senior judges in the Union's offshore banana republic.
cerebral prostitution, cerebral prostitution, cerebral prostitution
[info]cronyblatcher wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 05:19 pm (UTC)
The level and form of cerebral prostitution involved, is no less significant and disreputable than that which enabled legalisation of aggressive corporate welfare war
These results show how anxious the public is about the effects of the recession on the health servic
[info]famulla wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 11:41 am (UTC)
Mr Brown will focus heavily on ?bread-and-butter issues? jam i love jam and peanut butter please porridge eggs, toast Omletels not from EAST muchroom upsidown egg in the boiling kitty , pans of silver
MAY I please have a pill of morphines I want to donate this
Mr Brown will focus heavily on ?bread-and-butter issues? The survey found 89 per cent fear waiting times for treatment will increase, while 85 per cent think there will be more charges for NHS treatments. But only four out of 10 would also be willing to pay more taxes to protect growth in NHS funding. LET US PLAY BINGO WHO WIND TAKES THE NURSES LOSER TAKE DOCTORTS.. OTHER THE HOSPITAL .. you and me stetoscopes and BP machines
I thank you
Firozali A Mulla


Don't make me laugh
[info]othr wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 11:47 am (UTC)
I'm sure that a lot of people will die at home, regardless of the length of their illness. The way the NHS is going, we'll be dropping dead on the streets. As for the right to "Treatment from an NHS dentist", I'd laugh (if only my teeth weren't in such a state). Remind me again what an "NHS dentist" is, as I haven't found one available for such a long time.
[info]hanibalecter wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 12:03 pm (UTC)
I'm still waiting for my old rights to be delivered.
FREE kidneys and plastiv liver?
[info]famulla wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 06:25 pm (UTC)
*An operation within 18 weeks of patients first seeing their GP..... What is this doing here
*An operation within 18 weeks of patients first seeing their GP
I know this. Tell me where I can find the biggest tree to hang the chicken and the politicians. They caused this.
jake
PRONUNCIATION:
(jayk)
MEANING:
adjective: Satisfactory; all right; okay.
ETYMOLOGY:
Of unknown origin.
USAGE:
"So far as the state is concerned, everything is jake. But the council seems determined to throw a monkey wrench into the works."
James Gill; Council Seems Eager to Trip Up Churchill; The Times-Picayune (New Orleans, Louisiana); Apr 20, 2005.
A THOUGHT FOR TODAY:
Man's capacity for justice makes democracy possible, but man's inclination to injustice makes democracy necessary. -Reinhold Niebuhr, theologian (1892-1971)
"Binghamton Shooter" Jiverly Wong also garnered front-page headlines nationwide and set off a cable news frenzy when, "bitter over job loss," he massacred 13 people at an immigration center in upstate New York. Similarly, coverage was brisk after Pittsburgh resident Richard Poplawski, "upset about recently losing a job," shot four local police officers, killing three of them.
But where was the front-page treatment when, in January, Betty Lipply, a 72-year-old resident of East Palestine, Ohio, "who feared she'd lose her home to foreclosure hanged herself to death" shortly after "receiving her second summons and foreclosure complaint from her mortgage lender"? And where was the up-to-the-minute cable news reporting on the two California dairy farmers who "killed themselves ... out of despair over finances, according to associates"?
A THOUGHT FOR TODAY:
If you wish to be loved, show more of your faults than your virtues. -Edward Bulwer-Lytton, author (1803-1873)
I thank you
Firozali A Mulla


We know how this works
[info]kuma2000 wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 06:49 pm (UTC)
Big announcement today, 6 months later all forgotten, no changes, no extra money.
One more broken straw...
[info]can_uk wrote:
Monday, 29 June 2009 at 09:56 pm (UTC)
I wonder if Brown has actually thought these 'rights' through - in terms of the resources he's willing to give NHS workers, medical and administrative, on the actual front line of the service. It's all very well to promise the Earth, but you have to give the people who are doing the actual work the staff and time to get the job done. This is promising the impossible, and a serious clinical risk. Of course, it won't be Brown's fault when these new targets get someone killed.
Targets R Us
[info]rooster281 wrote:
Tuesday, 30 June 2009 at 12:06 pm (UTC)
Isn't it amazing that suddenly targets are being abandoned just when are approaching an election year. If they do not work, (which they don't) why have they not scrapped them before?
What a cyncical conniving bunch.


Free gym pass

Get fit for summer with Fitness First gyms in London

Download a free gym pass from Fitness First today

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date