Six new rights for every NHS patient
Private treatment will be paid for by hospitals which break treatment targets
Patients will today be promised six new rights to NHS treatment as the Government attempts to push through a new raft of public service reforms in the run-up to the forthcoming general election.
Gordon Brown will promise to scrap unpopular centrally-imposed NHS targets as he unveils a national prospectus seen as critical to his attempts to restore his authority and fight back against the Conservatives.
His Budget-style document, Building Britain's Future, will extend a consumer-driven approach to public services and include new measures to revive the economy. There will be more money for house-building by councils and housing associations, who will give greater priority to local people in order to prevent newcomers to an area from jumping the queue.
In an interview with The Independent yesterday, the Health Secretary Andy Burnham disclosed that the new "entitlements" for patients would include a right to:
*An operation within 18 weeks of patients first seeing their GP
*A free health check-up for all at the age of 40
*Treatment from an NHS dentist
*Die at home if they suffer from a long-term medical condition
*See a cancer specialist within two weeks
*Be treated in accident & emergency departments within four hours.
Although patients would not be able to sue the NHS for not providing these guaranteed services, Primary Care Trusts would be forced to send people to a hospital in another area or, in extreme cases, for private treatment if they cannot deliver it in NHS facilities.
Some of the entitlements, such as the 18-week limit for operations, are currently among the targets set by Whitehall for NHS managers.
Ministers will sweep away these targets and put patients in the driving seat by ensuring they know and demand their basic rights. Targets to be axed include a 26-week maximum wait for in-patient treatment.
A plethora of data collection, form-filling and box-ticking will be abolished later this year after a review by the NHS National Quality Board.
Clinicians willbehandedmore freedom to run their own budgets and to play a role inmanaging the service, breaking down the traditional divide between them and managers. Mr Burnham conceded that, with waiting-list problems addressed, targets had become a “millstone” and had to be lifted. The best elements of the targets system would now become “permanent service standards” to entrench the progress made in recent years. “The pressure for continuing improvements will come from patients, not politicians; that is a fundamental change,” he said.
In the interview, the Health Secretary denied that a squeeze on public spending would put the new patients’ rights in jeopardy, but stopped short of his previous promise that the NHS budget would continue to grow after 2011 – which the Treasury refused to endorse. “I can’t do Alistair Darling’s job for him,” he said. “What I would say is just look at our record. Labour has always looked after the NHS. It has been our priority and will continue to be our priority.” He admitted that annual growth in NHS spending is set to slow.
“The catch-up [with the EU average] has been done. It is now a case of maintaining what we have done.”
Mr Burnham added: “The NHS cannot be seen to be protected and immune from the pressures that other public services are facing.”
He promised a major switch of resources to preventing ill-health. “It has been fringe; it needs to become mainstream,” he said. The NHS would need to become smarter in order to meet pressures such as new treatments and a rising elderly population. In the long term, it would face “tough questions” such as whether to switch resources away from the acute sector.
He denied that the new rights would be demanded by the pushy middle classes rather than by those relying most on services.“We have got to be good at telling people what they can expect,” he said.
Mr Burnham’s comments come at the start of the annual British Medical Association conference in Liverpool, which yesterday released details of a poll claiming nine out of 10 people fear that NHS services will be cut as a result of the recession. The survey found 89 per cent fear waiting times for treatment will increase, while 85 per cent think there will be more charges for NHS treatments. But only four out of 10 would also be willing to pay more taxes to protect growth in NHS funding.
BMA chairman, Dr Hamish Meldrum, said: “These results show how anxious the public is about the effects of the recession on the health service.
While we appreciate that the Governmentneeds to steer the country through this difficult economic period, we urge it not to do so at the expense of NHS funding.”
In a progress report a year after his NHS review, Lord Darzi of Denham, the surgeon who is Junior Health Minister, will say tomorrow: “Quality is the thread that is being stitched into the very fabric of the NHS.”
Mr Brown will focus heavily on “bread-and-butter issues” such as public services as he relaunches his premiership. In a Commons statement this afternoon, he will also outline the draft legislative programme for the Queen’s Speech in November, the last before the general election.
Yesterday the Tories accused Labour of covering up the need for public spending cuts amid growing signs that the Treasury would delay the next government- wide spending review until after the election.
View all comments that have been posted about this article.
Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.
- Print Article
- Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2009 Independent News and Media Limited






Comments
Worse, you have to recall the mindset of the government which caused these measures to come into being in the first place - it hasn't gone way. So you can be sure that should Labour regain power at the next election, these changes will disappear and we'll return to insane legislation.
You'd have to be mad to vote Labour.
None of these proposals will do anything until we
1) get rid of chief executives who are put in place to asset strip and shut the public up.
2) Patient dignity is seen as normal
3) Access to basic services is seen as normal
4) Complaint handling is not seen as a nuisance - but rather something which could save money for essential services and lives.
5) GP's and Consultants can safely raise concerns on their patch without an overbearing chief executive ruining their career.
6) It is noted that a proportion of people are dying of advanced conditions have never been referred to anybody.
This chicken government is running for the hills just like the last shower in power when it comes to powerful defence unions, and the GMC. The DOH formal complaint system eats up valuable cash that could be used by the medical profession - too many over paid box tickers under the leadership of corrupt chief exectutives.
Just get the basics right before indulging in yet more rights, targets etc.
But does not say that, the reforms will be in place and practice before the election--jam tomorrow, maybe?
libertyandtruth says:
"You'd have to be mad to vote Labour". Partially right . . .
If you are not a cynic by the time you reach 20yrs today, you're retarded. Voting in the UK is a charade--the game is the same--only the players change. NewLabourConservativeLiberal--like congealed fat you try to swim in.
When did a political manifesto clearly convey the wishes and priorities of the people?
Education - Health Services - Housing - Pensions - Personal Liberties--all have plummeted while the talk goes on, as you vote for a pig-in-a-poke.
Where are the single sex wards Blair guaranteed in 1997?
In the accepted heirarchy of treaty terminology, a State's undertaking to "ensure" a right denotes the highest possible of obligation - it requires more than mere non interference with a designated right and requires the State party the treaty to execute positive measures, legislative administrative judicial and otherwise as necessary, to make sure the specified right can be effectively exercised. The word "ensure" is used 32 times in the substantive body of the on the children's rights and is not mitigated or derogated in any way.
Article 43 of UNCRC set up a Committee on the Rights of the Child that the sole authoritive reference source. That Committee in its eighth session heavily criticised Britain for not implementing many aspects of the Treaty.
In report "Concluding Observations of the Committee on the of the Child Concerning UK NI", the Committee found that Britain is in violation of the Treaty.
"In this the Committee observes in particular that the principal for the best interest of the child appears not to be
in legislation in such areas as *health, education, and social security*, which have a bearing on the respect
the rights of the child."
The fact of that finding of non compliance being unchanged at this date, is corroborated the utterances of all 4 of the the deliberately toothless British Children's Commissioners.
Against that background, the routine trampling underfoot of children's rights is aided and abetted by cerebral prostitutes who are appointed as 'safe' senior judges in the Union's offshore banana republic.
MAY I please have a pill of morphines I want to donate this
Mr Brown will focus heavily on ?bread-and-butter issues? The survey found 89 per cent fear waiting times for treatment will increase, while 85 per cent think there will be more charges for NHS treatments. But only four out of 10 would also be willing to pay more taxes to protect growth in NHS funding. LET US PLAY BINGO WHO WIND TAKES THE NURSES LOSER TAKE DOCTORTS.. OTHER THE HOSPITAL .. you and me stetoscopes and BP machines
I thank you
Firozali A Mulla
*An operation within 18 weeks of patients first seeing their GP
I know this. Tell me where I can find the biggest tree to hang the chicken and the politicians. They caused this.
jake
PRONUNCIATION:
(jayk)
MEANING:
adjective: Satisfactory; all right; okay.
ETYMOLOGY:
Of unknown origin.
USAGE:
"So far as the state is concerned, everything is jake. But the council seems determined to throw a monkey wrench into the works."
James Gill; Council Seems Eager to Trip Up Churchill; The Times-Picayune (New Orleans, Louisiana); Apr 20, 2005.
A THOUGHT FOR TODAY:
Man's capacity for justice makes democracy possible, but man's inclination to injustice makes democracy necessary. -Reinhold Niebuhr, theologian (1892-1971)
"Binghamton Shooter" Jiverly Wong also garnered front-page headlines nationwide and set off a cable news frenzy when, "bitter over job loss," he massacred 13 people at an immigration center in upstate New York. Similarly, coverage was brisk after Pittsburgh resident Richard Poplawski, "upset about recently losing a job," shot four local police officers, killing three of them.
But where was the front-page treatment when, in January, Betty Lipply, a 72-year-old resident of East Palestine, Ohio, "who feared she'd lose her home to foreclosure hanged herself to death" shortly after "receiving her second summons and foreclosure complaint from her mortgage lender"? And where was the up-to-the-minute cable news reporting on the two California dairy farmers who "killed themselves ... out of despair over finances, according to associates"?
A THOUGHT FOR TODAY:
If you wish to be loved, show more of your faults than your virtues. -Edward Bulwer-Lytton, author (1803-1873)
I thank you
Firozali A Mulla
What a cyncical conniving bunch.