Health & Families

Partly Sunny with Thunder Showers 17° London Hi 23°C / Lo 12°C

So how dangerous is skunk?

Our decision to drop The Independent on Sunday's 1997 decriminalise cannabis campaign has been applauded and decried throughout the world. At the heart of the controversy is the link between skunk and schizophrenia

By Jonathan Owen

The UN called the move courageous. Mental health experts described it as a crucial intervention. Sir Richard Branson says it is time to think again. And on pro-marijuana blogs and chatrooms from Sydney to Sarajevo, the mood was more murderous than mellow.

Seven days after The Independent on Sunday published evidence that almost 10,000 under-18s needed drug rehabilitation for cannabis use in Britain last year, a ferocious debate has begun over whether a potent new form of the drug is leading to growing mental health problems.

Beneath the headline: Cannabis - An Apology, the IoS revealed last week that more than 22,000 people were treated last year by the NHS for addiction and psychological problems caused by smoking skunk, which is up to 10 times stronger than resin or grass.

Ten years after Rosie Boycott, this newspaper's then editor, launched a campaign to have marijuana legalised, the IoS last week reversed its stance, stating that the evidence of mental health problems among smokers made the current 'C' classification correct.

The move has provoked an international debate about the threat posed by cannabis in general and skunk in particular. The warnings about the effects on mental health were underlined yesterday in a new report, saying almost a quarter of all new cases of schizophrenia would stem from cannabis smoking by 2010.

The study, published in the journal Addiction, also predicts that young men who smoke cannabis will be particularly at risk. The use of cannabis among under-18s rose 18-fold in the 30 years to 2002, according to the researchers.

Dr John MacLeod, co-author of the study, said: "If you assume a link [with cannabis] then the number of cases of schizophrenia will increase in line with increased use of the drug." Antonio Maria Costa, the executive director of the United Nations office on drugs and crime, yesterday called for people to wake up to the fact that cannabis is now a dangerous drug wrongly portrayed as a "gentle, harmless substance".

Writing in today's IoS, Mr Costa says that is no longer the case as a result of the potency of skunk, adding: "The cannabis now in circulation is many times more powerful than the weed which today's ageing baby-boomers smoked in college. Evidence of the damage to mental health caused by cannabis use - from loss of concentration to paranoia, aggressiveness and outright psychosis - is mounting and cannot be ignored."

Sir Richard Branson, head of the Virgin Group, who was a supporter of the IoS decriminalisation campaign, said yesterday: "The arrival of genetically engineered skunk has merited a new look at the situation."

Medical experts are now warning that the addictive nature of the drug means that detox clinics are needed. A report published in The Lancet last week showed how cannabis is more harmful than drugs such as LSD and ecstasy - but less so than alcohol and tobacco.

The number of people needing emergency treatment due to cannabis has virtually doubled in five years - from 581 in 2001 to near 1,000 last year.

But not everybody has welcomed the debate. Pro-legalisation campaigners claim the evidence for cannabis's damaging effects shows an association between the drug and psychosis, but not that one is the cause of the other. A more likely explanation, they argue, is that people in the early stages of mental illness may use the drug as a form of self-medication.

Roland Hyams a music PR and a supporter of decriminalisation, said: "I think alcohol is far more to blame for mental illness than cannabis. I've smoked plenty of skunk and never had problems."

However, some doctors now believe cannabis users have to take increasing quantities to experience the same "hit". A third of users are said to experience physical or mental withdrawal symptoms. One user in 10 is at risk of becoming an addict. "The strength of skunk means that users are more likely to become addicted to cannabis now," said Professor Peter Jones, professor of psychiatry at the University of Cambridge. "Withdrawal symptoms include anxiety, sleep disturbance and tremors."

J-Rock, from the rap group Big Brovaz and a former skunk addict, gave up the drug a year ago. He said: "Cannabis and skunk are definitely addictive and lead to psychological and physical changes in any person."

The 28-year-old musician started using when he was 13. When he came off the drug, he experienced headaches and mood swings. He describes the detox process as one of getting his sanity back. He says that skunk-induced paranoia is behind the surge in violent crime: "If you're on skunk and you have a confrontation with somebody, you feel almost untouchable."

Is this the evidence that shows cannabis is bad for your brain?

The controversial findings, published in the 'Journal of Psychoactive Drugs', give an indication of the possible effects of cannabis.

Images of the brain were created by single-photon-emission computerised tomography, which works by looking at blood supply and brain activity. Patients are injected with a radioactive substance which goes into the bloodstream and shows up on a brain scan. 'Mottled' areas represent areas where brain function is weakened . But some doctors question the validity of the images.

Normal brain

The brain image has a relatively smooth, uniform surface, with little indication of a loss of any brain function. It is the brain of someone who does not use cannabis and is an example of what an average brain can look like.

The 16-year-old who smokes every day

This scan, which shows a marked difference from the normal brain, is of a teenager who began using cannabis daily at 14 years of age. The image suggests that after just two years of using the drug, the brain is already affected

The 18-year-old who smoked for two years

The brain of a teenager who started using cannabis when 16 is badly pitted and scarred. The subject took the drug several times a week. Like the previous scan, this also apparently shows damage after two years of cannabis use.

The 28-year-old who smoked for 10 years

This scan shows how long-term damage can be caused by cannabis use. The subject had smoked skunk for 10 years. As with the other images shown, it appears to show decreased activity in the pre-frontal cortex and temporal-lobe areas.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

evidence that shows cannabis is bad for your brain, how about beer then?
[info]zerodivine1st wrote:
Monday, 16 March 2009 at 01:01 am (UTC)
I am a weed user, I have smoked weed for about 15 years on and off and I am always interested to read about how it's bad for you and the research behind it.
I think you are forgetting the point, everything that human beings like to do generally is bad for you.
Smoking tobacco, drinking and burger king are just a few things we do thats bad for you.
beer and vodka are terrible for you and they make people more violent why not make that illegal?
the police handle more booze related issues than i think anything else. why not just swap
you won't get a gang of stoners causing hassle if it was legal, mainly because they have one single goal.... food.
you wouldn't get stoned drivers, they would be too busy looking at the shape of the steering wheel.
The conclusion to my sort of rant is:
people should be given clear information and the choice to do what ever they want as long as it does not harm anyone else but them. canabis is not that bad for you, look at people who drink every day, they get addicted to it and or die from some sort of booze related dissorder

signed Zerodivine
skunk
[info]shameddriver wrote:
Thursday, 19 March 2009 at 12:26 pm (UTC)
To who it may concern im a 49 year old male smoked canabiss for37 years i have no problem with it the ,new scunks are not any different from when we used to smoke,dark black in the olden days one joint would stone you for up to6 hours.skunk ive grew and smoked most different types and i find the only problem is the mood swings if ive none.slight memory loss and a bit paranoia,now and again,Ithink personaly it should be decriminalised ,this would give the police more time to sort out more important crime ive been a white van man for 25 years drove every day 16 hours a day and never had any complaint or driving accident one speeding ticket when i was going to an alarm activation 10 year ago ,so say what will but i think it should be legalised for 18 plus due to young brains dont handle it to well ,it would deffinetly help out the poorer countries who produced it like alfganistan and the lebannon put more money in there, pockets for growing the weed ,magic mushrooms are growing wild and are even stronger than any skunk,,mr s mckay scotland
cannabis is not the main 'gateway drug
[info]mellibocus wrote:
Sunday, 22 March 2009 at 03:01 pm (UTC)
The only reason to regard cannabis asa gateway drug is because it brings users into contact with unscupulous dealers who want to make a bigger profit by getting their customers hooked on other substances.
Several years ago, I not only grew cannabis for my own use, but also supplied friends and acquaintances with it and was often asked if I could supply cocain, LSD, heroin, etc. Which I of course negated.
So it's bad for you brain
[info]cambob05 wrote:
Monday, 27 April 2009 at 08:59 pm (UTC)
15.000 people every year die from alcohol related incidents
100.000 people every year die from cigarrette related incidents
there is not yet one well documented death due to cannabis.

even if cannabis does have considerable health impedements it would seem considerably less so then alcohol and cigarrettes.

The only reason it is a gateway drug is because it is illeagal , if cigarettes were sold to you exclusively by a man who sold heroin then of course there would be people who would try heroin aswell, it is purely circumstantial, i've used cannabis for a year now . Of course i am not using it every day just every now and again on the weekend which is the way any substance should be enjoyed i.e alcohol.

I think if the government legalised and taxed cannabis the whole "gateway" scenario would be lifted.Let us be clear there is no chemical compound in cannabis that causes you to suddenly yearn to try crack cocaine . It is the circumstances in which the cannabis is aquired.

If it was sold to someone over the counter in a few years people will stop thinking of it as a "drug" and enjoy it as they would enjoy a night out at the pub.

I long for the days when we can casually and legally enjoy this god given substance in a safe welcome environment.
Musician's friends all affected
[info]ggrahamm wrote:
Friday, 15 May 2009 at 12:13 am (UTC)
I am a musician (a non smoker) and have many friends who smoke cannibas regularly In my experience ALL - every last one - have been badly affected by cannibas in varying degrees and ways Some of them do not realise it or admit to it, some see it in others whilst denying they are affected I have one good friend who is a musicain I have played regularly with for years and used to say to him ....'You are the only person I've known who takes cannibas regularly and is not affected by it' and attributed this to his natural hippy laid back lifestyle He is now fast becoming a cripple to it ....crippled in mind body and spirit And if I needed proof of this as not being merely my opinion ....his doctor had given him a book on cannibas's harmfulness and addiction Thank goodness cannibas is now receiving bad press Graham Scotland

Free gym pass

Get fit for summer with Fitness First gyms in London

Download a free gym pass from Fitness First today

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date