Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Survey finds few aware of health advice on oily fish

Graham Hiscott
Thursday 03 October 2002 00:00 BST
Comments

Few people know the health benefits or pitfalls of eating oily fish, according to a survey by the Consumers' Association.

Eating fish can reduce the risk of heart attacks and help blood circulation, the watchdog says in its magazine Which?

But certain oily species such as salmon, trout and mackerel run the risk of being contaminated with chemicals, while shark, marlin and swordfish might contain high levels of mercury, the report said.

Which? spoke to consumers to assess how many knew the current advice from the Food Standards Agency (FSA) about eating oily fish. Only 7 per cent could remember recent FSA guidance on mercury and fish, but none knew the details. One per cent recalled the agency had recommended that pregnant women avoid eating shark, swordfish and marlin. It extended the advice to women planning on becoming pregnant, and to children under 16. Only one sixth knew FSA advice that consumers should eat at least two portions of fish a week, of which one should be oily.

At the root of the problem is lack of knowledge about what is classed as oily fish, Which? says. Most could not name all the species available in the UK – herring, kippers, mackerel, marlin, pilchards, salmon, sardines, sprats, swordfish, trout and fresh tuna.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in