Health & Families

4° London Hi 9°C / Lo 3°C

Toxic waste blamed for birth defects

Echoes of Thalidomide scandal as council faces multimillion-pound payouts

By Robert Verkaik, Law editor

Families of children born fingerless or with webbed hands and feet are to go to court on Monday to try to secure a multimillion-pound payout for birth defects which they claim were caused by a council's mismanagement of toxic waste dumps.

The case is being compared to the thalidomide scandal of the 1960s and 1970s, when parents brought claims arising from their children's severe birth defects caused by having taken the drug for morning sickness.

In the new case, mothers allege that during their pregnancies in the 1980s and 1990s they were exposed to contamination from waste sites left over from the clean-up of Northamptonshire's former steel industry based in Corby. Toxicology and medical experts have told the families that the rate of upper and lower-limb abnormality in Corby is 10 times higher than the national average.

Des Collins, the solicitor running the case, said he had medical evidence that would prove the children's deformities are linked to the toxic waste dumps left by the former steel industry. He said: "We have now got medical reports that rule out alternative explanations for what caused the limb deformities in these children."

The town became a steel-making centre in the 1930s and by 1960 was one of the most heavily industrialised areas in the Midlands. In the early Eighties, the industry became unprofitable and British Steel closed the site, leaving the local council to take care of the clean-up operation.

But Corby Borough Council denies any responsibility and has already spent £1m on lawyers and a public relations firm to defend the allegations. Final defence costs are set to reach £2.5m.

Chris Mallender, Corby council's chief executive, said in pre-trial statement: "We have a great deal of sympathy with every child involved in this litigation, as well as with their families. However, for the past five years we have thoroughly investigated every aspect of the claims they are making and we know that there is no link between the reclamation work that was carried out in Corby, over a period of 20 years, and these children's birth defects."

The council will submit medical evidence to the court to rebut any comparisons with the human limb defects caused by the thalidomide drug between 1956 and 1962.

Dr Anthony Emmerson, consultant neonatal paediatrician at St Mary's Hospital, Manchester, concludes that the only teratogen (the agent that causes malformation or birth defects in foetuses) known to have produced human limb defects in the UK is thalidomide. His report states: "Of key importance is that the drug [thalidomide] was ingested in significant dosages during the critical period of three to eight weeks of pregnancy. In this case, the mothers of the claimants did not reside in Corby during their pregnancies, merely visited. It would need to be proven that during the crucial stage of their pregnancy they were subject to huge doses of offending teratogens."

Case study: "What's the matter with his hand?" I asked them

*Joy Shatford, 35, the mother in one of the lead cases in the legal action, recalled the air full of pungent fumes when council engineers began reopening some of the estimated eight to 16 toxic pits scattered around Corby. Dozens of lorries were used to transport the poisonous waste – mostly lead and zinc by-products from the steel-making industry – to two sealed containers north-east of the town.

"You could taste it in the air; it was sour, gassy and acidic. Then it was common knowledge that this was because they were digging up the pits," she said.

A few months later, Mrs Shatford, a secretary at a Kettering accountants, gave birth to her first son, Daniel, now 12. "The nurses just wrapped him up and gave him to me. They didn't say anything about his hand."

It was only when Mrs Shatford unravelled the tiny bundle of blankets that she discovered her son had been born with no fingers on his left hand. "I asked them, 'What's the matter with his hand?' It was such a shock. I just felt numb. I was left thinking I must have done something wrong during my pregnancy. But I didn't smoke or drink; I didn't even take an aspirin. It took me a long time to come to terms with what happened."

Years later, Mrs Shatford discovered she was far from alone. Now, nearly 20 years after the first cases of Corby hand deformity emerged, 18 families are to go to the High Court on Monday.

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

money grabbers
[info]corbyboy wrote:
Saturday, 14 February 2009 at 08:18 am (UTC)
it is pretty well known around town that many of the claimants did not live in Corby around the time of the clean up.But have jumped on the compensation band wagon,rounded up by self styled Erin Brochvich ambulance chasers to try and bump up their chances of a pay out.Corby has a large imigrant(scotish,irish etc) population and the percentage of deformaties (mostly missing fingers etc)is 20 or so in a town of nearly 62000 with birth dates spred over almost 10 years,this does not sound that high to me.
Re: money grabbers
[info]mike_nugent wrote:
Monday, 16 February 2009 at 06:02 pm (UTC)
Poppycock, corby is really a very small town, 20 is way too high for such a small town, You could expect that sort of number in a city. Everyone knows what corby borough council are like, They build race courses over chemical dumping grounds. Good luck to all claimants
MANY OTHER CAUSES AS WELL
[info]soaring_eagle1 wrote:
Monday, 16 February 2009 at 09:17 am (UTC)
ALTHOUGH I DON'T DOUBT THAT THEY ARE RIGHT ABOUT THIS CASE.

I WOULD JUST LIKE TO POINT OUT THAT THERE ARE MANY OTHER CAUSES OF DEFECTS AND TERMINAL ILLNESSES IN CHILDREN AND ADULTS. IN EVERYDAY CLEANING PRODUCTS, MAKE UP, FACE CREAMS
HAIR DYES, PLASTIC TOYS, BABY SHAMPOOS, CREAMS, ROOM SCENTER AND IN THE ATMOSPHERE TOO, FROM LACK OF PROTECTION FROM CHEMICALS COMING FROM FACTORY CHIMNEYS. ALL OF OUR PREPACKED FOOD STUFFS AND SOME OF THE SO CALLED FRESH PRODUCE ALSO CONTAIN HIGH LEVELS OF CHEMICALS SUCH AS PARABENS, THAT ARE CARCIOGENIC, GENDER CHANGING AND MUCH MORE.

BECAUSE WE TRUSTED THE PEOPLE WHO PRODUCE THESE THINGS TO MAKE SURE THEY ARE SAFE FOR US THEY ARE ABLE TO ABUSE OUR TRUST BUT PUTTING IN CHEMICALS WHICH STAY IN THE BODY ESPECIALLY IN THE LIVER AND MAKE US ILL FROM THE INSIDE.

I MAKE MY OWN STUFF FROM NATURAL ORGANIC PRODUCTS, THIS IS FAR SAFER.
Re: MANY OTHER CAUSES AS WELL
[info]namenonumber wrote:
Thursday, 19 February 2009 at 10:46 am (UTC)
Because anything natural is 100% safe
Re: MANY OTHER CAUSES AS WELL
[info]namenonumber wrote:
Thursday, 19 February 2009 at 11:32 am (UTC)
your first sentence gives away your position, have your heard the evidence from both sides?

100% natural and organic is not confirmation that a product is safe

you should apply the same rigour to assessng allegedly natural products as any other chemical cocktail

natural = safe
man made = hazardous

is a fallacy thats easy to fall for




First cases date back to late 1960s
[info]francis09 wrote:
Monday, 2 March 2009 at 03:26 pm (UTC)
The first cases of so-called "Corby hand" date back to the late 1960s when the steel works was in full operation and the toxic waste that became a problem in the 1980s was created. Before anyone raises it - the thalidome scandal predates all this as it clearly states in the article.


Free gym pass

Get fit for summer with Fitness First gyms in London

Download a free gym pass from Fitness First today

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date