Wakefield's colleagues in spotlight for MMR scare
British Medical Journal calls for inquiry into role of UCL academics who linked vaccine to autism
Jeremy Laurance is a writer on health issues. He is former health editor of The Independent and the i and has covered the specialism for more than 20 years. He thinks the harm medicine does is under-appreciated, the harm it prevents over-rated, and that cycling works better than most drugs. He was named Specialist Journalist of the Year in the 2011 British Press Awards.
Thursday 10 November 2011
A leading medical journal today calls on MPs to launch a parliamentary inquiry into research linking the MMR vaccine with autism and bowel disease, after claiming to have exposed evidence of widespread fraud behind the work of Andrew Wakefield involving up to 18 researchers and academics – including "senior personnel at the highest level".
Eighteen months after Wakefield was struck off along with one of his 12 co-authors, John Walker Smith – who is appealing – the British Medical Journal says new evidence removes "any remaining credibility" that the research team found a new inflammatory bowel disease linked to MMR.
The journal says specimens taken from children in the trial – the results of which appeared in The Lancet in 1998 and triggered the MMR scare – were "almost entirely normal" and were misreported as evidence of a new disease.
It shifts the spotlight from Wakefield – who worked at the Royal Free Hospital in London when he carried out the research – to his 12 co-authors and to six senior academics at University College London, which took over divisions of the Royal Free, the BMJ says.
In a letter to Andrew Miller, who chairs the Commons Science and Technology Committee, BMJ editor Fiona Godlee says if UCL does not immediately launch an independent probe, MPs must step in.
"This is not a call to debate whether MMR causes autism – science has asked that question and answered it," she writes. "We need to know what happened in this inglorious chapter in medicine. Institutional misconduct is too important to be left to the institutions themselves."
UCL had a history of trying to sweep the matter under the carpet, she alleges.
She says it refused to agree to Freedom of Information requests over the research until the Information Commissioner forced it to.
In 2004, UCL said a probe found all but one of the allegations unproven, she adds.
In 2010 The Lancet retracted the Wakefield paper after the General Medical Council struck him off.
Now UCL has given only "vague assurances" an inquiry will be held and nothing has been publicly announced, Dr Godlee says.
Wakefield has denied allegations he misrepresented or manipulated data.
The GMC verdict said he acted "dishonestly and irresponsibly", showed "callous disregard" for children's suffering and betrayed patients' trust.
UCL said it launched a probe this year but was still looking for a chairman. The MMR scare saw vaccination rates fall from 91 to 79 per cent in six years. It is back to 85 per cent but hundreds of thousands of children remain at risk and measles cases have soared.
Life & Style blogs
Babies cry at night to stop mothers procreating, scientists claim
Naked yoga: the bare truth - it's already big in the US, and has now landed here
GTA 5 Online spring DLC updates bring heists, new super car, multiple apartments and 'non-contact' option for races
Leading doctor calls for inquiry into NHS treatment of whistle-blowers
Kim Jong-ale: How did Ushers brewery of Trowbridge end up in North Korea producing Pyongyang's number one beer - and what did it take to set up a taste test back in Wiltshire?
- 1 KFC 'sorry' after lesbian couple are kicked out of Bath restaurant for 'heavy petting'
- 2 Dylan Tombides: West Ham confirm 20-year-old striker has died after battle with cancer
- 3 24 people applied for the 'world's toughest job', here are their interviews
- 4 'Sinful': Video of British Muslims dancing to Pharrell Williams's hit Happy comes under attack
- 5 PFA Player of the Year: Luis Suarez, Daniel Sturridge and Steven Gerrard all nominated as Liverpool dominate award shortlist
£150.00 per week: QA Apprenticeships: This company is a company that specializ...
£153.75 per week: QA Apprenticeships: This company is an innovative outsourcin...
£150.00 per week: QA Apprenticeships: This company has been providing on site ...
£150.00 per week: QA Apprenticeships: We've been supplying best of breed peopl...