More debate on the pre-run stretch

Click to follow
Indy Lifestyle Online

Runners, is the pre-run stretch a thing of the past? The subject of stretching is a source of hot debate in sports, and new research says it doesn't prevent injury.

Research by Maryland-based orthopedic surgeon Dan Pereles, MD - presented February 18 at the 2011 Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) - recruited about 3,000 runners and divided them into two groups. One group did three to five minutes of static stretching before each run. The other group just took off running without stretching. Both groups had a mix of men and women of different ages and running abilities. After three months, Pereles found that 16 percent of the runners sustained an injury, but the stretchers were no better off than the non-stretchers.

So, should you stop stretching? Not necessarily, says Pereles. In his study, those runners who were in the habit of stretching before running and were put in the "no-stretch" group sustained more injuries. "So if you're used to stretching, you should still do it," Pereles told NPR (US-based National Public Radio). Also runners who had a higher body mass index or a history of injuries sustained more injuries than others in the study.

"But, the more mileage run or the heavier and older the runner was, the more likely he or she was to get injured," Pereles said.

New trends in track and field coaching in the US suggest that a technique called "active isolated stretching" might protect runners from injuries better than traditional bend-and-hold techniques. Developed by trainer Aaron Mattes and used by massage therapists, physical therapists, and coaches, the technique emphasizes gentle, fluid repetitions of two- to three-second holds with more repetitions.

Read more about the study and AAOS presentation:

To read more on NPR and watch a video demonstration of active isolated stretching:

Aaron Mattes discusses and demonstrates his stretching technique here: