Health & Wellbeing

null 17° London Hi 20°C / Lo 12°C

Rise of the 'freebirthers': the mothers defying their doctors

Claire Henry meets a mum who trod her own path

Tuesday, 8 July 2008

Clio Howie chose to give birth at home without midwives, pain relief or any medical intervention

Clio Howie chose to give birth at home without midwives, pain relief or any medical intervention

For most pregnant women it would be a nightmare scenario: you're in the final stages of labour at home, there's no midwife or other medical help on the way. It's just you, in agony, on the bathroom floor, with your baby about to arrive – and your partner making frantic phone calls for help.

But some women, incredibly, are actually choosing to give birth at home without any medical professionals present, no drugs and having what is known as an unassisted or "free" childbirth.

Clio Howie from Pembrokeshire is one of these women. She felt that the NHS had nothing to offer her in terms of what she wanted for the birth of her second child. After a few antenatal check-ups and a 22-week scan to check that all was going well, she decided to "go it alone" and have the baby at home with only her partner there to witness the event.

"I believed emphatically in the ability of my body to be able to do this without any problems," she says. "I wanted to feel more involved with this birth, in a way I didn't with my first."

So emphatically did she believe in the power of her body that she allowed her unassisted birth to be filmed for a Channel Five documentary, Extraordinary People: Outlaw Births. It is an incredible event to witness. Howie calmly sits in the birthing pool, smiling and talking while her baby boy emerges and is lifted out of the water. At no point does she cry out in pain or scream – if ever there was an advert for an "ideal" intervention-free birth, this is it.

"It was a spiritual experience," she says. "I wanted my son to enter this world as a pure being and without fear. The best way to do that was by having an unassisted birth."

Clair MacVean, from south London, is another who had a planned, unassisted birth for her son, Rory, five months ago.

"I just didn't want anyone touching me or my baby throughout the labour," says MacVean. "I know it's not for everyone, but it felt right for me."

Having had a bad experience from her first birth in an NHS hospital, MacVean decided upon an unassisted birth at home. "I felt my birth in hospital was over-medicalised, over-managed and that the midwives had lost sight of the caring and empathetic aspect of their jobs," she says.

"I felt a loss of control in any decision-making and a complete loss of trust with the midwives. It felt like they were more interested in their machinery than they were in me or my baby. They took my baby away from me immediately after the birth when there was no need to. They left me there screaming, 'Give me my baby, give me my baby!' – it was only a few minutes, but it felt like a lifetime."

Although Howie and MacVean both had complication-free births and healthy babies, theirs is a controversial decision. The risks that they took in deciding to give birth without medical assistance are high, and the potential outcomes disastrous should anything have gone wrong. Unsurprisingly, it is not condoned by those in the medical profession.

Howie describes visiting her GP after the birth: "I had never met him before, but when he found out I had had an unassisted birth he actually shouted at me, he was so angry. I couldn't believe he was reacting like this. I have had to change to a different GP."

Maggie Blott, a consultant obstetrician at UCLH, is concerned that women are putting themselves and their babies in potentially life-threatening situations. "These women are choosing to take the kind of risk on behalf of their baby during labour that they wouldn't dream of doing after the baby was born."

Howie doesn't see what she did as risky, believing that "every woman knows by instinct when something is going wrong, and that is when she should call for help". When pressed about what might have happened to make her call for help, she is reluctant to hypothesise: "I didn't allow myself to think of any event that could go wrong, as this would have entered the element of fear into my mind about the birth."

Although there are no official numbers of women having an unassisted birth in the UK, there are countless examples of women who are unhappy with the standard of care they received during labour and after the birth.

The Healthcare Commission's review of maternity services, carried out last year, reported that 26 per cent of women had been left alone during labour at a time when it worried them, and 30 per cent did not feel involved in decisions about their care and the procedures performed.

It also showed a huge North-South divide: 70 per cent of maternity services in London fell into the lowest category of "least well performing", while in the North of England 75 per cent were rated as performing at the highest two levels.

Many women who do not wish to return to a hospital are opting for home births under the supervision of a midwife. But many independent midwives available for home births are prohibitively expensive (around £3,000 on average), so instead they can opt for an NHS midwife. But with an already overstretched NHS system and a chronic shortage of midwives, this brings with it its own set of problems.

Jo Lewitt, NCT chairwoman for Bath and Bristol, wanted a home birth for her second child. But when her contractions started and she called for an NHS midwife, she learnt that they were so understaffed that day there were no midwives available. "One midwife told me she was too tired to come – she said she had been working through the night and was too tired to drive. I couldn't believe what I was hearing."

Finally, a midwife did arrive, just in time – and less than an hour later, her baby was born.

"Even when there was no midwife on the horizon, I knew I didn't want to go into hospital again," says Lewitt. Her first birth experience had been terrible – on arrival at the hospital, she was told that her husband could not be with her in the labour ward because it was late at night. When she protested that she did not want to be without him, they left her to labour with her husband for 12 hours on a bed in the hospital corridor.

With the memory of this experience still in her mind, she says: "I would rather have had an unassisted birth at home if it came to that, than return to an NHS hospital."

Of course, there are thousands of women who give birth in NHS hospitals every year and are happy with the treatment they receive and speak of the wonderful midwives that ensured the safe arrival of their babies. But, as the system is faced with a shrinking workforce, tightening budgets and closures of midwife-led birthing centres, the concern is that more women will turn away from the NHS and hospital births after feeling that the level of care they received was substandard.

This is something that also concerns Louise Silverton, of the Royal College of Midwives. "Maternity services are still being ignored and midwives are being stretched to breaking point," she says. "I receive letters from midwives who say they actually dread coming to work and often work 12 hour days or longer. Many are often close to tears and leave the profession simply because it is not possible for them to do the job that they were trained for."

According to the Royal College of Midwives, a further 5,000 midwives is needed after birth rates have increased by 13 per cent in the last five years. The number of practising midwives, however, has dropped by 16 per cent since 2006. "This is impacting on the quality of care. Women expect a lot more from their midwives but this isn't happening and the lack of postnatal care is a disgrace," she adds.

Similarly, the funds allocated to NHS maternity services have also dwindled. In the Royal College of Midwives Parliamentary briefing in February, it was revealed that they have actually witnessed a cut of £55m.

Only last week Lord Darzi, Chair of Surgery at London's Imperial College and government minister advising on modernising the NHS, stated in his Next Stage Review report that more hospitals should be offering homebirths to mothers. However, Beverly Beech, chairwoman of the Association for Improvements in the Maternity Services says that, for this wish to become a workable reality, more funds will be required to ensure that there is the appropriate homebirth training for midwives.

"Midwives are losing the necessary skills for a 'natural' birth – too often they are trained for an obstetric delivery, focusing on procedures and intervention," she says. "Midwives need to be trained in how to attend a homebirth and to have the confidence to let labour progress naturally."

Although she does not condone unassisted births in any way, she is concerned that an increasingly interventionist approach is causing more problems than necessary, leaving women traumatised after a birth that should have been straightforward. The danger is that if NHS maternity services are not improved, more women may decide to opt out of NHS care altogether and perhaps go to the extremes of an unassisted birth.

If the trend towards unassisted birthing does increase, it would be a sad indictment of a failing NHS maternity system. As Maggie Blott of UCLH fears, "It would only be a matter of time until something goes wrong."

'Outlaw Births', by Clio David, is on Channel 5 at 9pm, 9 July

Interesting? Click here to explore further

Post a comment

Limit: 1000 characters

Comment
Your details

* Required field

View all comments that have been posted about this article

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP address logged and may be used to prevent further submissions. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by Independent.co.uk's Terms of Use

Comments

58 Comments

I had my son in April 2007. The most degrading and demeaning experience. I will free birth as I am safer without a midwife. I was strapped onto the monitor against my wishes, then left to labour in a room with 3 women. Midwife refused painrelief, examination and could not bother to come when I threw up or found blood on the toilet paper after I went to the loo. I finally was transfer after the shift change as I was 9 cm. In the labourward my waters where broken against my wishes and I was subjected to a forceps delivery without adequate painrelief or even a explanation beforehand. I was not given my child for two hours. As they were to busy searching for a cottonswap they lost after they sewed me up. No explanation , staff were uncaring, unsympathetic and I had absolutely not choice or say in any aspect of my care. I would not consider free birth if I could get acceptable care but it's not available on the NHs.

Posted by Silvia | 11.07.08, 10:38 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

There is a link at the bottom of this page to another Guardian article called "How to Think Yourself Better." I would encourage everyone who wants to understand the principles behind unassisted birth to read this article. My unassisted births went beautifully because I BELIEVED in myself and visualized a positive outcome. Clio Howie, the woman in "Outlaw Births" who gave birth peacefully with almost no pain at all followed these principles, as well. Each of us has the power to create what we want both in birth and in life. It can take some time and effort to overcome our fears and learn to believe in our own abilities, but it is well worth the effort.
Laura Shanley

Posted by Laura Shanley | 10.07.08, 21:53 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

My partner and I decided to have our first child at home after witnessing first hand the traumatic experiences of close freinds and family who had done the "sensible" thing and opted for a NHS hospital delivery.
We met the midwifes from the local midwife led birthing centre,who were amazingly supportive and encouraging.
The birth itself went amazingly well with our beautiful baby girl arriving in just over 12 hours.We were attended by 2 midwifes who really just took a back seat and allowed the birth to progress naturally only offering support when they felt it was needed.
This resulted in a relaxed and comfortable atmosphere which I have no doubt helped my partner do such an amazing job of delivering our daughter.
A midwife is in no way essential in my opinion but more money needs to be spent on training them for home birth so our story becomes the norm not the exception.

Posted by Alex | 10.07.08, 20:37 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

I had an unassisted birth and it was the only one of my four births that did not hurt.

I really never needed painkillers, never screamed in agony, never felt filled with fear. It was peaceful and calm, and my baby was born by candlelight...

My previous hospital birth left me with PTSD and I would never again risk my life or my child's in a system where no one can come because no one is available.

As for help, I'd have an ambulance at my door by dialling 999 quicker than three of the midwives answered my emergency buzzer in the hospital when I was alone, desperate and in agony.

Which is safer? Home surrounded by as many familiar and loving people as you want, knowing you can call for emergency help any time you need or alone in a hospital, frightened and in pain from that fear, your partner sent away to get some rest and every midwife on the unit already helping a woman giving birth and not able to come to you?

I know which "risk" I would rather take next time!

Posted by Kate W | 10.07.08, 11:41 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

NO birth is one hundred per cent safe, whether in hospital or home or jungle, but there are many ways in which overstretched professionals can introduce problems which then require intervention. Some of those problems can lead to death or a severely brain damaged baby.

The professionals do not always learn from their mistakes, and seem to be in denial about the possibility of incompetence.

Home births are much more likely to be a happy experience for mother and baby, with much less likelihood of failed bonding, and later, of a traumatised and depressed mother unable to give good quality care.

I wonder how many of the disaffected and violent youth who worry us so much today, started life in a dismal, overworked and understaffed maternity unit?

Posted by Sue RA | 10.07.08, 11:09 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

See one catastrophe and then choose, Dr. John? The truth is, many women who choose freebirth HAVE seen a catastrophe - in the hospital. To claim that hospital birth is the safest choice is simply not true. Ten years ago a baby was stillborn in an American hospital every 30-40 minutes. Today it's every 15-20 minutes. This is primarily due to unnecessary inductions and c-sections.

Yes, sometimes doctors save lives and I'm thankful for that. But over the years I've received numerous letters from women whose babies have been sliced into during unnecessary c-sections and episiotomies. I've heard from a woman whose baby died after her doctor compressed the cord during an unnecessary forceps delivery, and the list goes on and on. OB/GYN's are the most sued specialty. Sometimes they are unfarely blaimed. And sometimes they're not. What an insult to infer that freebirthers simply want "to do their own thing" with no regard for the safety of their babies.
Laura Shanley
www.freebirth.com

Posted by Laura Shanley | 10.07.08, 01:32 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

If you care more about yourself and your own experience than the health of your baby in the eventuality of some complication, have a homebirth.

Posted by al | 10.07.08, 01:11 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

It is not intervention and medical control, that makes birth safe, but a woman in control with her body and woman's intuition.

Posted by Verena Schmid | 09.07.08, 20:46 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

There is no scientific evidence in favor of the Brewer Diet, and in fact it goes against current theories of preeclampsia. In addition, a high protein diet can be Believe it or not, mainstream doctors would love it if they could prevent preeclampsia through diet!

The history of midwifery is long. Look in the Bible--it even mentions the Hebrew midwives, Shifra and Puah. Unassisted birthing was not unknown, but to present it as the norm in so-called "healthy tribes" is a fallacy.

I'm far from the only woman I know who discovered they had serious pregnancy complications without feeling symptoms. And no, we didn't just fail to "trust our bodies". Sometimes your body does not tell you what's wrong.

Posted by Alexis | 09.07.08, 16:56 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

I think the article makes it clear that Jo wanted a midwife at the birth - just shows that the poor midwives are understaffed and need more finances....and that we need more of them! Don't worry Jo Lewitt - when I read the article I just think your story shows how much extra help maternity services need these days (my sister is a midwife!)

Posted by Louise McP | 09.07.08, 16:36 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

58 Comments

Article Archive

Day In a Page

Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat

Select date