Consumers scent victory in the battle over charges. But they could still lose the war

Banking special report: Kate Hughes charts the effects of last week's ruling, which could lead to customers giving with one hand what they take with another

The first round of the battle to recover billions of pounds in unauthorised-overdraft bank charges for consumers has gone in favour of the man on the street.

Last week, the High Court ruled that the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) had the right to decide whether the charges levied by banks on people who go into the red without permission are legal. If the OFT decides the fees break consumer contract law, it should clear the way for customers to reclaim charges, plus interest. In the past two years more than 300,000 people have either taken their banks to court or threatened to do so to get back the charges they've paid.

Unsurprisingly, the banks are expected to appeal against the ruling and fight tooth and nail to keep hold of the £3.5bn every year, or £400,000 every hour, they make from these fees. But they aren't expected to win.

This all seems good news for customers, but experts believe the banks could have a nasty surprise in store for them, through the imposition of fresh fees. In effect, the UK system of free banking could be brought to an end.

For the time being, things are likely to move slowly. For a start, an appeal against the High Court decision could delay any resolution by a year. All the while, the freeze on bank-charge compensation claims imposed by the Financial Services Authority (FSA) is likely to stay in place.

"This will take years not months to conclude," says Simeon Linstead, head of personal finance at price-comparison-site uSwitch.- com. "Consumers should not be fooled into thinking banks will want to give up the extra revenue that default charges bring in.

"Banking customers have paid out an average of £742 per person in charges over the past six years. It is unlikely banks will be willing to pay all this back," he adds.

There may be the sought- after cap on charges, and these may be more clearly explained, but the long-term implications of the decision is what really concerns those in the know. "This is potentially a huge loss of income, which the banks will be forced to recoup," says Mr Linstead. If they can no longer get this money from consumers who repeatedly incur fees, it will have to be taken from all of the UK's 40 million current account customers.

"The ultimate result of the ruling will be significant effects on the costs incurred for current account customers, including those who stay in credit," says David Black of financial researcher Defaqto. In other words, this could be the end of the road for free banking.

And that may not be the only implication of the banks' loss of earnings. Kevin Mountford at comparison site Moneysupermarket.com predicts that banks will respond to overdraft caps in the same way they reacted to the limits on fees for missed credit-card payments imposed two years ago – with stealth charges. "They will find ways of getting round it. Banks with a number of products can add charges across them all."

Mr Mountford suggests that banks may add fees on top of an account's standard interest rate or APR. Where customers are in the red, they will take payments against the cheapest debt first, leaving those borrowings with the highest rate to accrue interest for longer. Services that have so far been free, such as initial account applications and administration, might begin to incur fees.

"Banks are very creative about bringing in money, especially in uncertain times," warns Mr Mountford. "And good intentions aimed at reducing unfair penalties often backfire."

'Have I left it too late to claim?' Your questions answered

Q. What has happened?

A. Seven banks and the Nationwide building society challenged the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) in the High Court over the legality of the charges they levy on those customers who have unauthorised overdrafts. They lost the case, which means that, in theory, the OFT should now have a free hand to impose limits on such charges. However, the banks can appeal against the court ruling.

Under its chief executive, John Fingleton, the OFT is carrying out a root-and-branch review to see whether bank charges are an unfair penalty on people who go into the red, or whether they reflect the true cost of administering unauthorised borrowing. Many experts believe that, under consumer law, high charges could be justified if the latter were proved.



Q. What happens next?

A. With so much money involved, the banks are expected to fight the High Court's decision. The consumer group Which? estimates they make between £3bn and £4bn every year in charges, and were obliged to refund around £784m to almost 350,000 account holders last year alone. An appeal by the banks could go all the way to the House of Lords and continue well into next year.



Q. Can I reclaim bank charges now?

A. No, you will have to wait. The comparison website uSwitch.com estimates that more than one million claims, totalling more than £713m, have been on hold since July 2007. And from the start of the claims freeze to January 2008, the banks have made £20.5m in interest on this money. For the foreseeable future, while the legal wrangling continues, consumers waiting to reclaim what they see as unfair charges remain out of pocket.

If you feel you have paid too much in bank charges over the past six years but have not yet put in a claim against your account provider, you can still do so. However, the banks are highly unlikely to process such claims, as they continue to be covered by a waiver granted by the City regulator, the Financial Services Authority (FSA), at the time the High Court case started, allowing them to freeze the compensation process. This will probably not be lifted until there is a definitive ruling from the OFT on unauthorised overdraft charges.



Q. What could the OFT do?

A. Ultimately, it could order the banks to cut their fees and refund billions of pounds in previously imposed charges. How low it may set bank charges is anyone's guess but it is unlikely it will allow the current situation – where customers can pay around £30 a time for going into the red without prior approval – to continue.



Q. What could happen if the OFT orders banks to cut charges?

A. The banks could lose out on £3bn-£4bn a year should these charges eventually be ruled unfair and illegal. They will be keen to recoup those profits elsewhere. When missed-payment charges on credit cards were ruled unreasonable and capped at £12 a time by the OFT two years ago, the card companies significantly raised other charges to make up their losses. It is possible that the banks could do the same, for example by scrapping free personal banking. In other words, they may start charging a monthly fee for simply having a current account.

Independent Partners; Do you need financial advice on your investments, pension or insurance? Book a free consultation with an independent Financial Adviser at VouchedFor.co.uk

Finacial products from our partners
Property search
Latest stories from i100
Have you tried new the Independent Digital Edition apps?
Independent Dating
and  

By clicking 'Search' you
are agreeing to our
Terms of Use.

ES Rentals

    iJobs Job Widget
    iJobs Money & Business

    Guru Careers: Pricing Analyst

    £30 - 35k: Guru Careers: We are seeking a Pricing Analyst to join a leading e-...

    SThree: Trainee Recruitment Consultant

    £20000 - £25000 per annum + OTE £45K YR1: SThree: At SThree, we like to be dif...

    SThree: Trainee Recruitment Consultant

    £20000 - £25000 per annum + competitive: SThree: Did you know? SThree is a mul...

    Guru Careers: C# Project Team Lead

    £55 - 65k (DOE): Guru Careers: A unique opportunity for a permanent C# Develop...

    Day In a Page

    Fifa corruption: The 161-page dossier that exposes the organisation's dark heart

    The 161-page dossier that exposes Fifa's dark heart

    How did a group of corrupt officials turn football’s governing body into what was, in essence, a criminal enterprise? Chris Green and David Connett reveal all
    Mediterranean migrant crisis: 'If Europe thinks bombing boats will stop smuggling, it will not. We will defend ourselves,' says Tripoli PM

    Exclusive interview with Tripoli PM Khalifa al-Ghweil

    'If Europe thinks bombing boats will stop smuggling, it will not. We will defend ourselves'
    Raymond Chandler's Los Angeles: How the author foretold the Californian water crisis

    Raymond Chandler's Los Angeles

    How the author foretold the Californian water crisis
    Chinese artist who posted funny image of President Xi Jinping facing five years in prison as authorities crackdown on dissent in the arts

    Art attack

    Chinese artist who posted funny image of President Xi Jinping facing five years in prison
    Marc Jacobs is putting Cher in the limelight as the face of his latest campaign

    Cher is the new face of Marc Jacobs

    Alexander Fury explains why designers are turning to august stars to front their lines
    Parents of six-year-old who beat leukaemia plan to climb Ben Nevis for cancer charity

    'I'm climbing Ben Nevis for my daughter'

    Karen Attwood's young daughter Yasmin beat cancer. Now her family is about to take on a new challenge - scaling Ben Nevis to help other children
    10 best wedding gift ideas

    It's that time of year again... 10 best wedding gift ideas

    Forget that fancy toaster, we've gone off-list to find memorable gifts that will last a lifetime
    Paul Scholes column: With the Premier League over for another year, here are my end of season awards

    Paul Scholes column

    With the Premier League over for another year, here are my end of season awards
    Heysel disaster 30th anniversary: Liverpool have seen too much tragedy to forget fateful day in Belgium

    Liverpool have seen too much tragedy to forget Heysel

    Thirty years ago, 39 fans waiting to watch a European Cup final died as a result of a fatal cocktail of circumstances. Ian Herbert looks at how a club dealt with this tragedy
    Amir Khan vs Chris Algieri: Khan’s audition for Floyd Mayweather may turn into a no-win situation, says Frank Warren

    Khan’s audition for Mayweather may turn into a no-win situation

    The Bolton fighter could be damned if he dazzles and damned if he doesn’t against Algieri, the man last seen being decked six times by Pacquiao, says Frank Warren
    Blundering Tony Blair quits as Middle East peace envoy – only Israel will miss him

    Blundering Blair quits as Middle East peace envoy – only Israel will miss him

    For Arabs – and for Britons who lost their loved ones in his shambolic war in Iraq – his appointment was an insult, says Robert Fisk
    Fifa corruption arrests: All hail the Feds for riding to football's rescue

    Fifa corruption arrests

    All hail the Feds for riding to football's rescue, says Ian Herbert
    Isis in Syria: The Kurdish enclave still resisting the tyranny of President Assad and militant fighters

    The Kurdish enclave still resisting the tyranny of Assad and Isis

    In Syrian Kurdish cantons along the Turkish border, the progressive aims of the 2011 uprising are being enacted despite the war. Patrick Cockburn returns to Amuda
    How I survived Cambodia's Killing Fields: Acclaimed surgeon SreyRam Kuy celebrates her mother's determination to escape the US

    How I survived Cambodia's Killing Fields

    Acclaimed surgeon SreyRam Kuy celebrates her mother's determination to escape to the US
    Stephen Mangan interview: From posh buffoon to pregnant dad, the actor has quite a range

    How Stephen Mangan got his range

    Posh buffoon, hapless writer, pregnant dad - Mangan is certainly a versatile actor