Jonathan Davis: Mortgage sums don't add up

In a ghoulish sort of way, I have been rather looking forward to the arrival of the letter about my top-up mortgage endowment policy from Scottish Life. There is some embarrassment, as someone who writes about investment as part of their professional life, in having to admit to having one of these much-derided mortgage policies at all.

In a ghoulish sort of way, I have been rather looking forward to the arrival of the letter about my top-up mortgage endowment policy from Scottish Life. There is some embarrassment, as someone who writes about investment as part of their professional life, in having to admit to having one of these much-derided mortgage policies at all.

Okay, I was young and ignorant at the time, and it was long before I first started to look more closely at what financial products actually delivered. What I do remember hazily from 15 years ago is that the idea of a mortgage endowment policy seemed reasonable at the time. The convenience of a one-stop product that combined life insurance, tax-friendly savings and an interest-only mortgage was an attractive feature for a busy married professional with children.

It was certainly what the pundits in the newspapers were recommending at the time and it did save me a few pounds a month in the early years of the term, for which I was grateful. Like everyone else, I did not focus much on the overall costs of the policy, which were not prominently displayed in those days (to put it mildly), let alone broken down.

Periodically, I have looked at records of my payments, at how the sum assured was growing, and more recently I started to calculate what rates of return might be needed to reach the eventual target sum. I have also checked the value of the policy with two or three traded endowment policy specialists.

So when the letter finally arrived, I was not expecting surprises. I had worked out correctly that my main endowment policy should not be affected by the review. My sums suggested that, even without assuming any terminal bonus, the fund needs to return around 4 per cent a year net to me for the next 10 years to meet the redemption figure, which is surely well within the bounds of the possible, even for an insurance company, and even allowing for today's low interest rate environment. (The implied return on my actual contributions over the 25-year life of the policy, I calculate, will be just under 7 per cent if no terminal bonus is paid - despite the greatest and longest bull market of all time.)

But I also have a small top-up endowment of £5,000 which, from memory, dates from the day we discovered we needed to fix the roof and the dry rot in the loft. Extending the mortgage seemed the simplest way to pay for it.

This, I calculated, might suffer some shortfall, given that the central assumption for investment returns now demanded by the regulators is 6 per cent per annum.

Well, the letter confirming this has arrived, and, I have to say, a more absurd communication I have rarely encountered, although (at nine pages) it is by some stretch the longest letter I have had from the company. What the letter informs me is that the projected shortfall on my £5,000 endowment policy, assuming a 6 per cent growth rate, is £450.

In other words, in 10 years, my contribution of £8.62 a month, which I have been paying since 1988, will fail to produce a sum greater than £4,550. To make good this potential shortfall, the company offers me the chance to pay an extra £5 a week (more than half as much again) for the next 10 years, and solemnly warns me that if I do not take the option, then I will lose the guarantee in the original policy.

Well, the nimbler amongst you may already have realised what makes this such an absurd suggestion. It does not take a genius to work out that paying £5 a month for 10 years would involve me in total extra payments of £600. In effect, the good folk at Scottish Life are inviting me (in all apparent seriousness) to pay them £600 to make good a projected shortfall after 10 years of £450. I would do a third better by putting the money in a sock under the mattress.

Now we all know life companies are not the hottest hands at the investment business, and that the projections are no more than that, but this reticence is surely taking the matter too far. As the Key Features document helpfully makes clear, the implied rate of return on the new policy I have been offered (assuming investment returns of 6 per cent a year) is minus 2 per cent a year.

This surely marks a new phase in the long and far from glorious history of the insurance business - instead of the offer you can't refuse, the offer that you cannot possibly accept. What make such a nonsensical offer possible are the costs and commissions. As the table shows, the letter helpfully explains that charges and other commission will eat up some £200 of the extra £600 I am being asked to pay.

Just to rub salt into the wound, part of this sum will be commission to the adviser who first put me into this policy - step forward a well-known High Street bank, though quite what the bank has done to earn such largesse, is nowhere explained. You might have thought they should be paying me, not the other way around. The costs also include a premium for extra life cover for the projected shortfall amount, which I have surely already paid for, and am now being asked to pay for again.

Rather than creating a new policy, the common-sense solution to the projected shortfall would have been simply to increase the monthly premium on the existing policy. But this is not allowed, since to do so would apparently breach the regulations which allow the sum assured to be returned tax-free on maturity (you can always trust the Inland Revenue to get in on the act somewhere).

So instead of common sense, we have an absurd solution to a ridiculous problem. Quite what Scottish Life think they are doing by sending out such a letter defeats me. They cannot seriously believe what they are suggesting is either helpful or in the best interests of the recipients.

Either they should say it makes no sense to take out this new policy (if they believe the assumptions) or they should explain in what circumstances it could possibly make sense. Better, if they really had the interests of their policyholders at heart - and Scottish Life is a mutual society - it should clearly offer a cheaper and more sensible alternative to the shortfall problem. The company could eliminate the problem by buying a 10-year gilt that actually yields today the 6 per cent that is assumed in the projections.

So why have they done it? Presumably the answer will be, "It was the regulators who made us do it". That is a defence, but hardly a convincing one. As a certain tabloid columnist likes to say, you simply cannot make this kind of thing up. It needs an acid pen to do justice to the full absurdity of it.

If this is the kind of tosh being sent to those affected by much more serious shortfalls than mine, or are unclear what to do, I dread to think what further suffering will be caused before this whole ridiculous affair is brought to a close.

davisbiz@aol.com

Independent Partners; Do you need financial advice on your investments, pension or insurance? Book a free consultation with an independent Financial Adviser at VouchedFor.co.uk

Finacial products from our partners
Property search
Latest stories from i100
Have you tried new the Independent Digital Edition apps?
Independent Dating
and  

By clicking 'Search' you
are agreeing to our
Terms of Use.

ES Rentals

    iJobs Job Widget
    iJobs Money & Business

    SThree: HR Benefits Manager

    £40000 - £50000 per annum + pro rata: SThree: SThree Group have been well esta...

    Recruitment Genius: Office Manager / Financial Services

    £30000 - £37000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: Established in 1999, a highly r...

    Jemma Gent: Year End Accountant

    £250-£300 Day Rate: Jemma Gent: Are you a qualified accountant with strong exp...

    Jemma Gent: Management Accountant

    £230 - £260 Day Rate: Jemma Gent: Do you want to stamp your footprint in histo...

    Day In a Page

    War with Isis: Fears that the looming battle for Mosul will unleash 'a million refugees'

    The battle for Mosul will unleash 'a million refugees'

    Aid agencies prepare for vast exodus following planned Iraqi offensive against the Isis-held city, reports Patrick Cockburn
    Yvette Cooper: We can't lose the election. There's too much on the line

    Yvette Cooper: We can't lose the election. There's too much on the line

    The shadow Home Secretary on fighting radical Islam, protecting children, and why anyone in Labour who's thinking beyond May must 'sort themselves out'
    A bad week for the Greens: Leader Natalie Bennett's 'car crash' radio interview is followed by Brighton council's failure to set a budget due to infighting

    It's not easy being Green

    After a bad week in which its leader had a public meltdown and its only city council couldn't agree on a budget vote, what next for the alternative party? It's over to Caroline Lucas to find out
    Gorillas nearly missed: BBC producers didn't want to broadcast Sir David Attenborough's famed Rwandan encounter

    Gorillas nearly missed

    BBC producers didn't want to broadcast Sir David Attenborough's famed Rwandan encounter
    Downton Abbey effect sees impoverished Italian nobles inspired to open their doors to paying guests for up to €650 a night

    The Downton Abbey effect

    Impoverished Italian nobles are opening their doors to paying guests, inspired by the TV drama
    China's wild panda numbers have increased by 17% since 2003, new census reveals

    China's wild panda numbers on the up

    New census reveals 17% since 2003
    Barbara Woodward: Britain's first female ambassador to China intends to forge strong links with the growing economic superpower

    Our woman in Beijing builds a new relationship

    Britain's first female ambassador to China intends to forge strong links with growing economic power
    Courage is rare. True humility is even rarer. But the only British soldier to be awarded the Victoria Cross in Afghanistan has both

    Courage is rare. True humility is even rarer

    Beware of imitations, but the words of the soldier awarded the Victoria Cross were the real thing, says DJ Taylor
    Alexander McQueen: The catwalk was a stage for the designer's astonishing and troubling vision

    Alexander McQueen's astonishing vision

    Ahead of a major retrospective, Alexander Fury talks to the collaborators who helped create the late designer's notorious spectacle
    New BBC series savours half a century of food in Britain, from Vesta curries to nouvelle cuisine

    Dinner through the decades

    A new BBC series challenged Brandon Robshaw and his family to eat their way from the 1950s to the 1990s
    Philippa Perry interview: The psychotherapist on McDonald's, fancy specs and meeting Grayson Perry on an evening course

    Philippa Perry interview

    The psychotherapist on McDonald's, fancy specs and meeting Grayson Perry on an evening course
    Bill Granger recipes: Our chef recreates the exoticism of the Indonesian stir-fry

    Bill Granger's Indonesian stir-fry recipes

    Our chef was inspired by the south-east Asian cuisine he encountered as a teenager
    Chelsea vs Tottenham: Harry Kane was at Wembley to see Spurs beat the Blues and win the Capital One Cup - now he's their great hope

    Harry Kane interview

    The striker was at Wembley to see Spurs beat the Blues and win the Capital One Cup - now he's their great hope
    The Last Word: For the good of the game: why on earth don’t we leave Fifa?

    Michael Calvin's Last Word

    For the good of the game: why on earth don’t we leave Fifa?
    HIV pill: Scientists hail discovery of 'game-changer' that cuts the risk of infection among gay men by 86%

    Scientists hail daily pill that protects against HIV infection

    Breakthrough in battle against global scourge – but will the NHS pay for it?