Secrets Of Success: Who polices the investment police?

Two headlines this week have drawn attention, once again, to the controversies that surround the business of fund selection. Both underline why most investors find it hard to know what to believe on the subject.

Two headlines this week have drawn attention, once again, to the controversies that surround the business of fund selection. Both underline why most investors find it hard to know what to believe on the subject.

One story, in a Sunday newspaper, quoted research from Professor Ian Tonks, at Exeter University. It found evidence that fund performance does "persist" from one period to the next. This is contrary to the view of the regulators that there is little or no merit in taking past performance into account when considering which fund to buy. On average, you would, they say, do as well with a dartboard, and better by picking funds on the basis of costs rather than performance.

The second story, by contrast, pointed to evidence that fund ratings, which many investors use to help them choose a fund to buy, "are unreliable and irrelevant". The source for this was another academic study, this time from a French business school.

Most of the best-known published ratings systems are based on a mixture of qualitative and quantitative measures, in which risk-adjusted past performance is given a significant weight. The implication is therefore once again that trying to predict which funds will do well in future is pretty much a waste of time, just as the Financial Services Authority (though not the providers of ratings) would prefer you to believe.

Which view is right? And should one take much notice anyway of academic studies of this kind (of which there are now a great number, stretching back more than 30 years)?

The answer, it seems to me, having ploughed through a lot of this stuff over the years, is that it is as well to be aware of the broad nature of the debate that goes on over the persistence of fund performance, but not to let it stop you applying common sense in choosing your funds. Being a slave to the latest academic nostrum can be an expensive habit.

The trouble with academic studies is that they tend to concentrate on aggregate data (in part, because it is readily accessible and can be quickly run through a computer programme to generate an easy, career-advancing article for a specialist journal). As a result, the exercise yields statistically significant results but doesn't actually tell you much that is of huge practical interest outside academia.

There is no question that the first study into fund management performance, by a young Harvard professor called Michael Jensen, caused something of a sensation when it first appeared more than 30 years ago. It showed clearly that most mutual funds (the US equivalent of our unit trusts and Oeics) did not, in fact, outperform the market they were trying so hard to beat and which everyone at the time assumed was their rationale. Scores of subsequent studies have confirmed this.

The discovery helped to sustain the momentum towards index-tracking funds over the next 25 years. But for such a potentially damaging discovery, it has to be said that it has done surprisingly little to stop the phenomenal growth of the actively managed fund business around the world over the same time period. While index funds have since grown from nowhere to become a huge industry in their own right, actively managed funds still account for the larger part of the fund universe.

Could this be because the academics are missing something that most investors can see makes sense from a pragmatic point of view? While the nature of the academic mind is to test general hypotheses from analysis of a specific set of data, the pragmatic investor is more interested in finding the exceptions that prove the rule. It is the funds that appear to have bucked the trend of market-trailing performance, not the average fund nor the aggregate behaviour of competitor funds, that we want to know about.

The academics eschew the National Lottery (on sensible statistical grounds) and put their money into index funds of one kind or another, thereby guaranteeing moderate but reliable performance over time. But the animal spirits among us tend to say: "I don't care how unreliable the data is, just give me a shot at the handful of funds that have the potential to beat the market."

The issue then becomes one of trying to predict which of the funds will outperform in future, a task in which ratings (in my view) have a certain but limited role to play.

Any system of ratings is, by definition, mostly backward-looking. If it is to be based on any analysis, it has to have some grounding in the way that the fund has performed in the past, for the obvious reason that data about the future does not yet exist. Fund rating services today are much more sophisticated than when they first appeared. Most look at risk-adjusted rather than raw performance figures, and some (such as Citywire) focus on individual fund manager performance, recognising that managers of funds do move around a lot.

Services such as Standard & Poor's also interview managers about the way they run their funds in some depth, and claim to give a lot more weight to qualitative and style factors.

Having said that, I know of no convincing evidence that picking funds on the basis of ratings alone does much to improve your chance of finding a market-beating fund. The founder of one of the better known ratings services told me once that his analysis suggested a top rating increased the probability of an outperforming fund continuing to outperform from 50 per cent (what you would expect if there was no way of predicting) to about 55 per cent. Even if true, and replicated elsewhere, that is not much of an edge.

The study by Professor Tonks, which looked at the performance of pension funds from 1983 to 1997, suggests a figure of 58 per cent, but notes that this only applies for performance one year ahead, and to the specific sample period he looked at.

Would it be cost-effective to switch funds around every year, hoping to catch an 8 per cent edge? Almost certainly not. Are ratings services a waste of time? I would not go that far, as they have a useful information and monitoring function.

Fund managers like them, because a rating provides some external validation, and they clearly have an influence on sales. The reality is that while a fund worth buying will almost certainly have a good rating, the reverse is not the case. A good rating does not guarantee the fund in question is worth owning.

jd@intelligent-investor.co.uk

Independent Partners; request a free guide on NISAs from Hargreaves Lansdown

PROMOTED VIDEO
Extras
indybest
Travel
Flocking round: Beyoncé, Madame Tussauds' latest waxwork, looking fierce in the park
travelIn a digital age when we have more access than ever to the stars, why are waxworks still pulling in crowds?
Arts and Entertainment
tv
Arts and Entertainment
Judi Dench appeared at the Hay Festival to perform excerpts from Shakespearean plays
tvJudi Dench and Hugh Bonneville join Benedict Cumberbatch in BBC Shakespeare adaptations
Sport
Is this how Mario Balotelli will cruise into Liverpool?
football
News
Ronahi Serhat, a PKK fighter, in the Qandil Mountains in Iraqi Kurdistan
i100
Arts and Entertainment
Poet’s corner: Philip Larkin at the venetian window of his home in 1958
booksOr caring, playful man who lived for others? A new book has the answer
Arts and Entertainment
Exhibition at the Centre Pompidou in Metz - 23 May 2012
art
News
Matthew McConaughey and his son Levi at the game between the Boston Red Sox and the Houston Astros at Fenway Park on August 17, 2014 in Boston, Massachusetts.
advertisingOscar-winner’s Lincoln deal is latest in a lucrative ad production line
Life and Style
Pick of the bunch: Sudi Pigott puts together roasted tomatoes with peppers, aubergines and Labneh cheese for a tomato-inspired vegetarian main dish
food + drink
Arts and Entertainment
Alfred Molina, left, and John Lithgow in a scene from 'Love Is Strange'
film
Finacial products from our partners
Property search
Latest stories from i100
Have you tried new the Independent Digital Edition apps?
Independent Dating
and  

By clicking 'Search' you
are agreeing to our
Terms of Use.

ES Rentals

    iJobs Job Widget
    iJobs Money & Business

    Junior Quant Analyst - C++, Boost, Data Mining

    £25000 - £35000 per annum: Harrington Starr: Junior Quant Analyst - C++, Boost...

    Service Desk Analyst- (Desktop Support, Help desk)

    £25000 - £35000 per annum: Harrington Starr: Service Desk Analyst- (Desktop Su...

    Junior Quant Analyst (Machine Learning, SQL, Brokerage)

    £30000 - £50000 per annum: Harrington Starr: Junior Quant Analyst (Machine Lea...

    UNIX Application Support Analyst- Support, UNIX, London

    £45000 - £55000 per annum: Harrington Starr: UNIX Application Support Analyst-...

    Day In a Page

    Air strikes? Talk of God? Obama is following the jihadists’ script

    Air strikes? Talk of God? Obama is following the jihadists’ script

    The President came the nearest he has come yet to rivalling George W Bush’s gormless reaction to 9/11 , says Robert Fisk
    Ebola outbreak: Billy Graham’s son declares righteous war on the virus

    Billy Graham’s son declares righteous war on Ebola

    A Christian charity’s efforts to save missionaries trapped in Africa by the crisis have been justifiably praised. But doubts remain about its evangelical motives
    Jeremy Clarkson 'does not see a problem' with his racist language on Top Gear, says BBC

    Not even Jeremy Clarkson is bigger than the BBC, says TV boss

    Corporation’s head of television confirms ‘Top Gear’ host was warned about racist language
    Nick Clegg the movie: Channel 4 to air Coalition drama showing Lib Dem leader's rise

    Nick Clegg the movie

    Channel 4 to air Coalition drama showing Lib Dem leader's rise
    Philip Larkin: Misogynist, racist, miserable? Or caring, playful man who lived for others?

    Philip Larkin: What will survive of him?

    Larkin's reputation has taken a knocking. But a new book by James Booth argues that the poet was affectionate, witty, entertaining and kind, as hitherto unseen letters, sketches and 'selfies' reveal
    Madame Tussauds has shown off its Beyoncé waxwork in Regent's Park - but why is the tourist attraction still pulling in the crowds?

    Waxing lyrical

    Madame Tussauds has shown off its Beyoncé waxwork in Regent's Park - but why is the tourist attraction still pulling in the crowds?
    Texas forensic astronomer finally pinpoints the exact birth of impressionism

    Revealed (to the minute)

    The precise time when impressionism was born
    From slow-roasted to sugar-cured: how to make the most of the British tomato season

    Make the most of British tomatoes

    The British crop is at its tastiest and most abundant. Sudi Pigott shares her favourite recipes
    10 best men's skincare products

    Face it: 10 best men's skincare products

    Oscar Quine cleanses, tones and moisturises to find skin-savers blokes will be proud to display on the bathroom shelf
    Malky Mackay allegations: Malky Mackay, Iain Moody and another grim day for English football

    Mackay, Moody and another grim day for English football

    The latest shocking claims do nothing to dispel the image that some in the game on these shores exist in a time warp, laments Sam Wallace
    La Liga analysis: Will Barcelona's hopes go out of the window?

    Will Barcelona's hopes go out of the window?

    Pete Jenson starts his preview of the Spanish season, which begins on Saturday, by explaining how Fifa’s transfer ban will affect the Catalans
    Middle East crisis: We know all too much about the cruelty of Isis – but all too little about who they are

    We know all too much about the cruelty of Isis – but all too little about who they are

    Now Obama has seen the next US reporter to be threatened with beheading, will he blink, asks Robert Fisk
    Neanderthals lived alongside humans for centuries, latest study shows

    Final resting place of our Neanderthal neighbours revealed

    Bones dated to 40,000 years ago show species may have died out in Belgium species co-existed
    Scottish independence: The new Scots who hold fate of the UK in their hands

    The new Scots who hold fate of the UK in their hands

    Scotland’s immigrants are as passionate about the future of their adopted nation as anyone else
    Britain's ugliest buildings: Which monstrosities should be nominated for the Dead Prize?

    Blight club: Britain's ugliest buildings

    Following the architect Cameron Sinclair's introduction of the Dead Prize, an award for ugly buildings, John Rentoul reflects on some of the biggest blots on the UK landscape