Spend & Save

Rain (AM and PM) 4° London Hi 10°C / Lo 3°C

Want to earn extra cash? Use your imagination...

From testing drugs to mystery shopping, there are lots of ways to boost your income.

By Kate Hughes

Breeding pedigree animals could be a good long-term earner

AFP/Getty Images

Breeding pedigree animals could be a good long-term earner

News of redundancies making you nervous? Fancy building up a cash buffer in case of financial disaster, or need to boost your savings? Forget bar jobs and stacking shelves, there are more fun and imaginative ways to generate a second income.

Surveys

Companies that provide products and services need to know that they're appealing to current and future customers, so pay agencies to collect plenty of data from all sorts of people. As an incentive, those agencies will offer you cash, vouchers or the opportunity to win prizes in return for your thoughts. You have to be over 18 and a UK resident to take part. Sign up at www.sarosresearch.com, for example, and you could earn from £30 to £100 for two hours' work.

Tour guide

If you know enough about your local area and it attracts enough tourists, you could sell your knowledge as a tour guide. You'll need plenty of time, some comfy shoes and be confidence with public speaking. It helps if you know a few words of a range of foreign languages to ingratiate yourself with your target audience. A basic walking tour can bring in as much as £5 per person.

Competitions

There are scores of online competitions that don't require a stamp or a phone call to enter. You can win anything from CDs to large sums of cash and holidays. Plenty of websites have lists of free-to-enter competitions, including www.born toloaf.co.uk, which also offers tips on how to make the most of your entry. Watch out for competitions that demand a payment to enter or register on the site.

Virtual office

Old-fashioned envelope-stuffing ads tend to be a scam, taking your money to set up in the first place then disappearing. But becoming a virtual secretary, giving support to small businesses that can't afford their own full-time staff, can earn you between £10 and £20 an hour. You'll need good word-processing and computer skills, a phone and an internet connection for your home computer. See www.ebs-digital.co.uk.

Rent your kids

If you, your children or even your pets are particularly pleasing to the eye, or even if you're not, modelling could bring in £200 for a five-hour session, minus an agency commissioning fee. Avoid agencies that charge an up-front fee as the reputable ones will take a 20 to 25 per cent cut of earnings. One of the largest agencies in Europe is www.modelsdirect.com.

Auction sites

Trawl car-boot sales for a bargain, polish it and sell it for a huge mark-up on online auction sites such as eBay. Alternatively, listings online which are wrongly labelled can be snapped up for a song and resold. As well as eBay, try www.esources.co.uk.

Tutoring

From music to maths lessons, there's no end of things people want to learn. You'll have to be good though, and have heavyweight credentials, especially with the academic subjects. The more qualified you are the more you'll earn, but expect upwards of £20 an hour. Self-employed and individual workers can't apply for a Criminal Records Bureau check, but if you work via an agency this may be necessary. For more information, visit www.crb.gov.uk.

Rent space

Clear the junk out of your spare bedroom and rent it out, or, if you live in the centre of a city, even your parking space could be worth a few pounds a month. The rent should be based on local market rates, and the Government's "Rent a Room" scheme means that you can earn up to £4,250 a year tax-free (£2,125 if letting jointly). Go to the "Rent a Room Scheme" page at www.direct.gov.uk.

Babysitting/childminding

For anyone taking on a job with children, you'll need to know what to do if any dramas unfold and be able to take control of the situation. Having contact details to hand for parents, close relatives and local emergency services should be a must. You can earn upwards of £5 an hour.

Street performing
If you're not shy of an audience and have a decent visual talent, even if it's just standing still, this could be an option. You'll need to be able to cope with banter from the audience, a bit of rain and a variable income. Get in touch with your local council to find out about any restrictions or rules.

House and petsitting

Housesitters are paid to live in someone else's house while the owners are away. Many people will pay around £20 a day for you just to be there and may even stock the fridge for you. In return, you'll need to look after the house and its contents, including arranging any emergency work, care for any pets and water the plants. Advertise locally or through an agency such as www. homesitters.com, or www. g-angels.co.uk.

Film or TV extra

Fancy brushing shoulders with the stars? Then sign up as an extra. The BBC pays around £60 a day, and you'll get free meals. However, you'll need to be prepared to travel at short notice and stand around in the rain and cold for long periods of time. Agencies provide producers with databases of extras and may charge you a membership fee. Visit www.universalextra.co.uk or www.extra.co.uk.

Mystery shopping

This is another dream job for many people, a huge number of large retail companies use mystery shoppers to check their service levels. That means you can get paid to eat, drink, shop, and even watch movies. Assignments pay between £5 and £15 each, plus being reimbursed for purchases. Avoid agencies which charge a sign-up fee. Try www.retaileyes.co.uk .

Drugs testing

Not for the squeamish, taking part in drugs trials can earn you money for taking a tablet or injection then sitting around drinking tea. You may also get a few free nights' accommodation. Volunteers are paid anything from £50 to a few thousand pounds, depending on the level of risk or pain involved and the duration of the test. Enquire with your local hospital first before searching for clinical and medical trials online from sites such as www.testwiththebest.com.

Cashback

If you're careful, not to mention disciplined, there could be money to be made from banks and retails themselves. Cashback from credit cards and bank accounts, as well as discount shopping sites, is often offered as an almost free way to entice new customers because the vast majority of us will spend it elsewhere rather than use it to pay off our debts. The amount you get back can be anything from a few per cent of the value of smaller items to several hundred pounds for taking out a mortgage, but it's more of a discount on your living costs than a second income. Alliance & Leicester is offering £100 if you sign up to their current account before Thursday.

Domestic breeding

The rat-like creatures celebrities cart about in Louis Vuitton bags are worth a fortune themselves. Pure-breed dogs, cats and even rabbits can sell for hundreds of pounds each, so breeding them seems like a real money-spinner. But there is significant cost, time and effort involved before you earn anything. You'll have to buy a pure-breed female then stud it. There are also ongoing veterinary bills and proper care, exercise and accommodation to consider. Domestic breeding schemes take up to 20 years to become profitable, so it's not an option for short-term cash.

Nude modelling

Comfortable with your body? Artists often need life models and it's not as smutty as it sounds. Nude modelling involves taking your clothes off and staying still for up to 45 minutes per pose. Experienced life models earn around £10 an hour, so enquire with local colleges or universities or consider membership of the Register of Artists' models at www.modelreg.co.uk .

Phone operative

This is where it all gets morally challenging. If you've got a phone line and a good imagination, you can fit in adult calls around your everyday commitments. It's a competitive market, but you could earn in excess of £10 an hour. Go to www.adultwork.com and www.fone-me.com/action/operator for ways to list your services.

Sperm/egg donor

Did I mention morals? Those happy to donate their baby-making material could be "reimbursed" for expenses and lost earnings for up to around £250. It's illegal to be paid for sperm or egg donation in the UK, but fertility clinics in the US offer up to $8,000 (£5,500) for egg donation. That can involve surgery under general anaesthetic, so it's one for the strong, and open- minded (www.ngdt.co.uk ).

Surrogate mother

Upping the ante, if you can cope with the emotional and physical roller-coaster, becoming a surrogate mother could offer hope to childless couples and earn you some cash at the same time. Again, it's illegal to be paid for this service in the UK, but in the US and South Africa for example, surrogacy can earn you as much as $20,000 (£13,700) per baby. Take a look at www.surrogateweb.com .

For lots more inventive ways to boost your income, '101 Ways to Make Extra Cash in a Recession', by Gavin Griffiths is available from Microvar Limited or www.101guides.co.uk

Post a Comment

View all comments that have been posted about this article.

Offensive or abusive comments will be removed and your IP logged and may be used to prevent further submission. In submitting a comment to the site, you agree to be bound by the Independent Minds Terms of Service.

Comments

[info]samcculloch wrote:
Saturday, 28 March 2009 at 03:59 am (UTC)
Breeding animals is not something people should be doing in order to make money, and it's very disappointing to see the Independent advocating such a thing. Animals should not be treated as a commodity.
Breeding animals to make money
[info]samcculloch wrote:
Saturday, 28 March 2009 at 04:00 am (UTC)
Breeding animals is not something people should be doing in order to make money, and it's very disappointing to see the Independent advocating such a thing. Animals should not be treated as a commodity.
Re: Breeding animals to make money
[info]drivngmissdaisy wrote:
Saturday, 28 March 2009 at 07:47 am (UTC)
I agree ... I am frankly appalled that a paper of this caliber lists basically backyard breeding of animals as a way to make some pin money. Lots to be disappointed about in advocating this - but from a dog perspective we have a overpopulation crisis of dogs - promoting breeding of yet more is very sad.
model agency
[info]grounded00 wrote:
Saturday, 28 March 2009 at 09:47 am (UTC)
The web site www.modelsdirect.com. is a bit suspect as the page links are not working
Breeding Animals..
[info]22meme33 wrote:
Saturday, 28 March 2009 at 02:16 pm (UTC)
Amazed and appalled... take this off immediately. As if we don't have enough problems. Next you'll be telling me to have kids just to get the benefits. All the rest I know about anyway - giz'a job writing lists, please
Re: Breeding Animals..
[info]fulkehunke wrote:
Saturday, 28 March 2009 at 07:29 pm (UTC)
Did you actually read the article, it explained quite clearly that it was not an easy option and wasn't something that should be taken on lightly. If I or anyone else wanted to breed animals, I have the right to do so. I personally could not be bothered with the mess or the smell. Please consider that you're not every bodies mother, and if you're the mother of the editor, send him to bed with no supper, but let him do HIS job.
Re: Breeding Animals..
[info]notbanksy wrote:
Saturday, 28 March 2009 at 08:28 pm (UTC)
Yes, if you want to breed animals you are within your rights to do so, but it is still an abuse of a living being.
An animal is a being, like a human, not a source of extra cash.

Also, a totally rubbish article. Nude modelling? It's a recession, not a heroin habit ffs....
Re: Breeding Animals..
[info]drivngmissdaisy wrote:
Sunday, 29 March 2009 at 12:12 pm (UTC)
there are 'rights' and there are 'greater goods'. just because you have a 'right' (which should be limited by legislation in this case anyway) doesn't mean you should. some things should not be done, because the greater good is more important. in this case backyard breeding destroys the breeds, overproduces animals and causes yet more death. so it should be stopped for the greater good.


a point not being driven home enough here is the economic fact being ignored by the writer, who probably meant this all to be a bit of a laugh in the face of the recession, is the logic that people can't afford purebred animals because they too are cutting back on 'frivolous' purchases. aside from the cost of upkeep of a pet member of the family, etc.
Re Breeding Animals
[info]pounddogrescue wrote:
Saturday, 28 March 2009 at 09:18 pm (UTC)
To The Independent,
Please inform the journalist who wrote this article that an average of 21 dogs are destroyed in the UK, PER DAY. In 2007, over 105,000 dogs were recorded to have been collected by local authorities. 7,892 dogs were DESTROYED unnecessarily, according to a survey conducted on behalf of the charity Dogs Trust. This journalist clearly hasn't done any research on the appalling stray dogs situation in the UK. May I make a suggestion? Give the job to someone else, preferably someone who cares. I administrate a website listing the seemingly never ending number of unfortunate dogs in UK pounds, and on behalf of the people who spend their lives trying to save these poor creatures and educate the public to NEUTER, SPEY, ADOPT RATHER THAN BUY and ultimately STOP BREEDING DOGS, I think this article should be swiftly removed, replaced with an apology and a useful article put in its place - perhaps the article should be about all the dogs that are put to sleep every day because money seems to mean more to people than animals do.
Breeding Animals!
[info]tasha0409 wrote:
Saturday, 28 March 2009 at 09:29 pm (UTC)
I work within animal rescue and am appalled that such a long-running newspaper could ever suggest such a thing!! There are thousands of animals in rescue already and hundreds are put to sleep daily why on earth would anyone suggest breeding more illicit pups as a money making scheme!!! Shame on you!!!!!
[info]braveheart99 wrote:
Saturday, 28 March 2009 at 09:39 pm (UTC)
Are you a mindless fool asking Idiots to breed dogs when there are so many dogs in Rescue's that need homes.............................Utterly diabolical.................Braveheart (RHU)
Making cash
[info]sarahogg wrote:
Saturday, 28 March 2009 at 10:00 pm (UTC)
I am disgusted at this article sugesting making money out of breeding - take a look at all the dogs in need of new homes - as the credit crunch hits more & more dogs are ending up in rescue or worse when those rescues are full put to sleep!

how irresponsible to promote breeding giving more of these animals a death penalty.

Breeding Animals
[info]jennie71 wrote:
Saturday, 28 March 2009 at 10:04 pm (UTC)
I am appalled that the author of this article would even suggest that backyard breeding is an appropriate and viable solution to the credit crunch! FFS, just visit your local rescue and see what happens to the vast majority of animals churned out by the puppy farmers in it for the buck. Please, remove this article and post something useful. Jennie (RHU)
Domestic Breeding
[info]adelemaria wrote:
Saturday, 28 March 2009 at 10:06 pm (UTC)
I find this suggestion very irresponsible

Please do not breed or buy while Homeless Animals die

So many homeless animals in shelters that are struggling to survive money wise, but rescue out of the kindness of their hearts.. animals being killed due to lack of space and funding.

Have a Heart - Adopt Don't Shop
Breeding Animals
[info]ziggyandco wrote:
Saturday, 28 March 2009 at 10:16 pm (UTC)
As a an animal rescue worker I am absolutely apalled at your downright stupid and irresponsible article suggesting that people might consider breeding animals in order to make money. I take it you have never visited your local dog pound and asked them how many dogs they have put to sleep this year so far? or have you visited your local rescue centre and seen all of the sad faces behind bars waiting for someone to come along and offer them a home, if you are a bull breed or don't fit the perfect pup mold you could find yourself in for a very long wait indeed, sometimes a lifelong wait. And you are suggesting breeding more....very clever

I thought the Independant was supposed to be an educated paper but obviously I was wrong.... you clearly employ morons who know nothing about the real world.

Ziggy&co
Dog breeding
[info]samlittlelegs wrote:
Saturday, 28 March 2009 at 10:49 pm (UTC)
How irresponsible!!!!!!!

There are already many thousands of dogs, cats and other pets in need of loving, warm and suitable homes. In addition to this there are many more who are euthanised, abused, starved, mistreated and bred irresponsibly.

Encouraging anybody to breed their pets or worse still to buy a pet with the sole intent of breeding it is disgraceful.

Dog breeding should not be taken on lightly and is an exhausting, stressful and expensive thing to enter into.
pure bred breeding
[info]wiggy_rhu wrote:
Saturday, 28 March 2009 at 10:57 pm (UTC)
The article on breeding animals is so wrong, to say that pure bred animals will surive during this recission si wrong, considering there are so many animals in rescues, so many animals being put to sleep everyday because of people breeding and thinking they can make money on these breeds. Putting that thought into peoples minds is wrong, its very very wrong of the independant. Maybe your researchers need to do a little more research on animal pounds, shelters, foster homes etc and then maybe write something.
Dog breeding
[info]levismum wrote:
Saturday, 28 March 2009 at 11:09 pm (UTC)
I am absolutely dumbfounded by your appalling suggestion to breed more puppies to line the pockets of people who are struggling. You seriously need to be thinking of the effect this will have on the dogs in the future, not about how we can find another source of income by using them this way!!! I really cant add much more to the previous posts, its all been said!!! Our rescues in this country are ALL bursting at the seams with unwanted dogs, some of whom will never know a home environment again!!!! These dogs were all cute little pups once, they grew up and found themselves no longer wanted and either cast out or sent to be euthanised!!! For goodness sake remove this from your article immediately before you help add to the already diabolical situation within the unwanted dog population. I am astounded by your total ignorance in even suggesting this. Do something to help these dogs instead!!
Domestic Breeding
[info]kimifa wrote:
Saturday, 28 March 2009 at 11:57 pm (UTC)
Breeding pedigree animals could be a good long-term earner - FOR YOUR VET!!!

Obviously Kate hasn't got pets, and hasn't done her research, pedigree pups are being given away as people can't afford to buy them, rescue centres are inundated, healthy animals are being put to sleep, some are given away free to good homes and some end up as bait for dog fighting. The average vet bill is a weeks wage, is her OH a vet by any chance?


Force Breeding
[info]shamefularticle wrote:
Sunday, 29 March 2009 at 03:54 am (UTC)
How dare you recommend 'domestic breeding' as a 'real money-spinner' - DISGUSTING !!!

I'm appalled that The Independent should publish such an unprofessional and irresponsible money hungry guide on how to help increase the problem of unwanted shelter pets.

The Dog's Trust 2007 stray dog survey states that 7,982 dogs were destroyed in the UK that year.

Neuter and spay is the only solution, please do not force breed your pets, for every animal you breed or buy a shelter pet will die.
TRASH!
[info]roslamb wrote:
Sunday, 29 March 2009 at 12:41 pm (UTC)
Are there not enough animals in the world in need of homes without encouraging people to breed more?

This is irresponsible beyond measure.
Lazy journalism
[info]szge wrote:
Sunday, 29 March 2009 at 01:35 pm (UTC)
The article admits that it can take 20 years to turn a profit from dog breeding, and that in the UK you'd make little money from surrogacy etc, but hey you journalists get paid by the word whether it is contradictory immoral rubbish or not.
Breeding
[info]clarejane wrote:
Sunday, 29 March 2009 at 02:34 pm (UTC)
I have to say I am shocked and disgusted that you would suggest breeding to make money!!!! Firstly can I say having bred myself if done properly you don't actually make money secondly have you thought about all the rescues centers bursting at the seams with unwanted dogs, not to mention the thousands that are put to sleep!!!! I feel your comments regarding this are totally irresponsible and thoughtless. If people want to make a quick buck this is defo not the answer in fact the reality is that you will probably end up out of pocket as opposed to making a profit. Shame on you!!!!!
Breeding animals to make money
[info]rottiemad wrote:
Sunday, 29 March 2009 at 03:23 pm (UTC)
Breeding for money???????? The independant shouldn't be surported this
Its like them surporting puppy farmers and condoning which is what they are implying
this is so wrong
About the animal breeding idea
[info]mulekist wrote:
Sunday, 29 March 2009 at 03:48 pm (UTC)
Dont you know in hard economic times the pets are the first to go? People are losing their homes and shelters are full of PUREBRED animals whos owners had to surrender them....people are simply NOT buying pets in these hard economic times. Moreover, there is a pet-overpopulation problem so your suggestion to breed more is ill-advised.
pet breeding
[info]urbanfox100 wrote:
Sunday, 29 March 2009 at 04:12 pm (UTC)
How irresponsible to recommend that people use their pets as 'cash cows'
Breeding requires specialist knowledge and should be left to those who are passionate about their particular breed rather than someone thinking they can make a quick buck.
Take a reality check Independent.....You just lost my custom !!
How irresponsible
[info]andrea_2 wrote:
Sunday, 29 March 2009 at 04:45 pm (UTC)
to reccomend breeding animals to make money. And: Rent Your Kids. So animals and children are just property are they? Not sentinent beings?

The Independent should be ashamed of itself. This is total rubbish.
Breeding Animals
[info]mismae wrote:
Sunday, 29 March 2009 at 09:40 pm (UTC)
Encouraging the general public to become backyard breeders is totally irresponsible the pounds and the rescue centers are bursting at the seams as it is, does no one at this newspaper check the content before printing i agree this jouranlist has not done his homework sounds like they are making a quick buck themselves very disapointing
Breeding
[info]roseforever wrote:
Sunday, 29 March 2009 at 11:42 pm (UTC)
Breeding animals is one of the most irresponsible things a human being in this day and age could do (along with eating meat, driving hummers and throwing chemicals into our habitat).

This is harmful on so many levels. There are millions of animals, dog in particular being horrendously killed around the world; poisoning in Turkey, being noosed and hung in Greece, having acid thrown at them, being skinned alive and eaten for food in Asia.

In right here in North America there are gas chambers killing thousands of dogs and more being slightly more humanely euthanized.

This is a direct result of human interference, breeding and and irresponsible dog (and cat) owners.

I am so appalled that will all the puppy mills finally being publicized for their horrible agenda's and all the information out there today on the abuse of dogs and other animals that any person would actually publicly admit this is such a large profitable venture.

And shame on all the selfish hollywood individuals who buy them!
How disgusting breeding for money not health
[info]montiesmum wrote:
Monday, 30 March 2009 at 06:15 am (UTC)
I think this is absolutly disguting this in encouraging back yard breeders an puppy farmers
The dogs would not be breed for health they would be breed for money and the people who buy the puppies are the ones who are going to suffer with vet bill, heart ache ect.
How can you as a leading news paper encourage this behaviour
Re: How disgusting breeding for money not health
[info]flukespad wrote:
Monday, 30 March 2009 at 06:47 am (UTC)
Guess you are not an animal lover ?? We are one of many small UK rescues who rely totally on our donations from homing rescues on and help from our non paid volunteers/foster homes to survive and are already overflowing because recession / irresponsible owners and breeders who do not care where or what happens to their pets once sold and here are you openly encouraging people to breed and with no thought to the consequences you should be disgusted in yourselves .Suggest you take a trip to the pounds and some rescues and watch the 100's of healthy dogs being destroyed each week from pups of 6 weeks old to beautiful golden oldies of 10 & more or better still come spend a couples of days hand rearing pups after mum was turned out as pregnant and not wanted and so ill her life was only saved by having a ceasarian, look after the 10 week olds who if not saved would have been drowned as owner could not sell them, go through the heart ache of coping with the cruelty cases in rescues care and the agony of how to find money for their vet bills.Come pick up the pieces with us and face the consequences of your thoughtless actions and words.
[info]denandash wrote:
Monday, 30 March 2009 at 08:09 am (UTC)
We are over run with animals that have been bred by people who are out to make a quick, tax free buck.
Despite us being a nation of animal lovers a dog is put down every 2 minutes in England. One day the breeding from animals will be strictly controlled, spaying, neutering and micro chipping of animals will be compulsory and an animal will be for life not until the novelty wears off.
Domestic Breeding
[info]pouchie wrote:
Monday, 30 March 2009 at 08:41 am (UTC)
This is a most stupid comment! There are enough unwanted puppies out there already without giving morons the idea to go off and produce more just to try and earn a fast buck. Try making the same comment after running a rescue and dealing with Joe public calling all hours of the day and night trying to off load their unwanted pets! Grrrrrrr
Breeding Animals
[info]kayjdee wrote:
Monday, 30 March 2009 at 09:25 am (UTC)
How on Earth did the editor let this get by him?

So soon after the airing of Pedigree Dogs Exposed the suggestion that the breeding of animals in any way would make a profit is disgusting. To correctly health check a mother and have it turn out good enough, finding a Father that will be health checked and good enough to improve the breed, maternity care and then puppy raising, health care and vet checks...you would be lucky to break even. To encourage people to do this for money, and therefore cut corners, rather than the love of the animals is morally deeply wrong
[info]beckyhew wrote:
Tuesday, 31 March 2009 at 11:31 am (UTC)
There are enough homeless animals out there who are killed everyday because there are no homes for them. Seeing the Independent encouraging adding to this problem just to make money is disappointing. How heartless and selfish can you get?
Breeding Animals for Money
[info]soya1969 wrote:
Tuesday, 31 March 2009 at 12:35 pm (UTC)
So, animals are just a profit centre now, are they? They exist simply to put money into the pockets of "Man", do they? How about encouraging people to use their skills, talent and creativity to earn extra cash, rather than abusing the rights of defenceless animals who have no say in the matter?
Brreding animals for profit?
[info]bhodiwulf wrote:
Thursday, 2 April 2009 at 10:13 pm (UTC)
Good grief. We are in a recession...the worst since 1930's. Lots of similarities. The BIG difference is that now it seems "ok" to throw all moral judgement, all ethics out of the window in order to make cash.
To advocate pedigree puppy breeding as a "quick fix" to earning cash is rediculous. One of my dogs was "rescued" from people who have these aemoebic problem solving abilities. She was extremely sick, lacked any medical care or attention and would have most certainly died had we not taken her. her siblings probably did perish although the RSPCA went to the location a day later to remove them.
To breed dogs purely for profit, with no skill or knowledge is scandalous. There are hundreds of puppy "mistakes" born every day. Hundreds more abandoned. And here we have the Independent advocating puppy breeding as a way through the recession.
Have a baby and "sell it", sell your body to drug testing, rent your kids...?!!! and risk messing them up for life but hey...you made a few bucks at the time because they were "visually pleasing"....BUT....the Independent begins to question morality....wait for it....by suggesting becoming a phone operative on an adult phone line?!!!
I am astonished at the ignorance, arrogance and complete lack of forethought by this so called respectable paper to have published such rediculous and closed thinking ideas.
Tell you what, why not just add dealing class A drugs to the list and be done with it? Prositution earns a decent buck too.....
Breeding pedigree animals for cash
[info]pipsmum09 wrote:
Friday, 3 April 2009 at 05:31 pm (UTC)
I am horrified to read your suggestion that breeding animals is a good way to make money. Ok you say it is not short term, however, it is surely not a responsible suggestion to make in a time of financial crisis. You may be aware that the rescues are experiencing an increase in animals being left because their owners cannot afford to keep them.
There are already numerous breeders of good and poor quality stock producing too many puppies. These all have to be found homes for life. Every week dogs are destroyed in the pounds because no one gives them a home. Please retract this suggestion and advise people if they want a dog,or cat, to go to a reputable rescue.

































breeding Animals to make money
[info]halfpenny1 wrote:
Saturday, 4 April 2009 at 05:03 am (UTC)
if you have to thought to the future of your animals, if you have no compassion for there future wellfare in the longterm and if you dont mind the idea that they may , as the 5 rescues i have, all end up in rescue well bread or otherwise. then Fine go ahead.

I deplore you making a comodity out of Dogs, i really do. support the rescues they end up in if you really want a drum to bang.

Support the welfare organisations that cope with the inbreeding and over breeding and puppy farms and there horrible trade.

Now go bang a drum about a real cause to raise cash for.

Edith Mowatt

Aberdeenshire
Domestic Breeding
[info]daniellepat wrote:
Saturday, 4 April 2009 at 09:37 am (UTC)
I cannot believe a paper with this reputation is encouraging dog breeding AKA puppy farms. I am part of a group who dedicated every day of the week to stop puppy farming. These animals are kep in horrific conditions and have all sorts of diseases. Maybe anyone suggesting this should watch this video http://www.dogs-r-us.org/news.shtml then ask yourself is it such a good idea to suggest this sort of thing!!
Dog Breeding
[info]tobilouie wrote:
Saturday, 4 April 2009 at 10:42 am (UTC)
How dare you suggest this as a way to make money. Have you never seen the films made on puppy farms and puppy mills they are nothing more than concentration camps for dogs. I with a friend have recently presented a petition to Carmarthenshire County Council against their puppy farms 86 licensed in this Welsh County alone, more than all of the other Welsh counties out together. The conditions inside these so called puppy farms are nothing more than hellish with animals being abused as I write. You are a totally irresponsible person suggesting this as a means to make money. This is a horendous trade with the emphasise by these pupy farms to make money at any cost i.e. with no cost to the welfare of the dogs incarcerated in them. Take alook on You Tube and type in Welsh Puppy Farms and then come back and tell me this is an acceptable way to make money. Shame on you and this paper do your research before suggestong such a thing. Go to Dogs-R-Us to see the truth and view the films made by S4C and broadcast December 2008 and January 2009.

Yours in Total Disgust

Jan Gilmour
Dog Breeding
[info]melhuish wrote:
Saturday, 4 April 2009 at 10:48 am (UTC)
It is veryirresponsible for you to suggest dog breeding as a way to make money. There are enough dogs in rescue often resulting from unwanted litters already. Plus there is great concern over puppy farming, especially in Wales, ( see ---http://www.dogs-r-us.org/news.shtml )where the conditions are often appalling .Having had a litter a few months ago from a rescue dog who was found to be pregnant I can tell you that the time and cost involved is immense and NOT to be under taken with any intention of making money.
Puppy Farming by any other name
[info]morg2 wrote:
Saturday, 4 April 2009 at 01:05 pm (UTC)
I am flabbergasted that The Indie would actually publish something that encourages people to irresponsibly breed puppies. No mention of health checks either, quite, quite shocking when there are thousands of dogs euthanised each year in the UK.
Breeding animals to make money!!!!!1
[info]cushti wrote:
Saturday, 4 April 2009 at 01:35 pm (UTC)

What an irresponsible, stupid suggestion to make. Remove your head from the sand and take a look around Kate Hughes. Both you and your newspaper has lost much credibility.
dog breeding
[info]themassesrebel wrote:
Sunday, 5 April 2009 at 06:58 am (UTC)
We are fighting the 'over breeding' of dogs daily, and the horrors of irresponsible breeding, not to mention the amount disposed of in puppy-supermarkets that don't sell while they are still puppies - how could you have put this in? Absolutly dispicable!
I know you tried to put people off by the expences bit etc, but you have now planted the seed in the minds of those who want easy cash. Do you have no idea how many dogs and puppies are suffed to the rafters in rescue homes at the moment? and will be there for years never to find a home - shame on you!!!!!!!!!! It is the last time I, or mt family will buy this newspaper
Go to www.dogs-r-us.org/puppylove and see for yourself.
Domestic Breeding
[info]j_elrod wrote:
Friday, 10 April 2009 at 11:30 am (UTC)
Absolutely appalled, I will never buy this paper again.

'You'll have to buy a pure-breed female then stud it' - that short sentence sums up the significant intellect gap from the person writing the article, and I am frankly disgusted, whoever wrote this knows nothing of responsible breeding of animals, whoever allowed it to be published should be fired.
Domestic breeding
[info]j_elrod wrote:
Friday, 10 April 2009 at 12:07 pm (UTC)
I am absolutely appalled by this article.

You'll have to buy a pure-breed female then stud it.' - this short sentence shows the complete lack of comprehension and intellect from the writer; the fact that it was allowed to be published is criminal. Its this sort of flippant remark that prompts Joe Blogs down the road to breed from their animal without any real thought to the welfare of the animals involved.
backstreet breeders encouragement - how could you!?
[info]renemcdonald wrote:
Tuesday, 14 April 2009 at 03:26 am (UTC)
I cannot believe that a journalist would suggest breeding dogs as a way of earning extra cash. It is not only irresponsible but morally wrong when there are so many backstreet breeders producing pups purely for profit and damaging the breed because of bad pairing. The rescues all over the UK are overflowing with badly bred dogs bred by ill informed back street breeders. When amateur breeders are allowed to do this for money all that happens is dogs develop deformities and are abandoned. Rescues and the pound are the only places for them. Hundreds die every year because of this. Please take this suggestion off your site immediately if you have any sense and compassion.
R.McDonald (Glasgow)