Average water bill to be cut by pounds 50
Friday 30 October 1998
The reductions, proposed by Ian Byatt, the Director General of Ofwat, are higher than those envisaged by ministers and were immediately greeted with howls of protest from water companies. In a consultation paper, Mr Byatt said that household water bills needed to come down substantially to reflect efficiency gains and recommended a 15-20 per cent cut.
That would reduce the average domestic bill from pounds 245 this year to between pounds 195 and pounds 205 in April 2000 when the new charges take effect.
But in some areas of the country, the cut in bills would be significantly higher. Customers of South West Water, whose charges are the highest in the country, could see the average bill of pounds 344 fall by as much as pounds 69. In the Thames region, where charges are the lowest in the country, the average bill of pounds 202 would come down by between pounds 20 and pounds 30.
Mr Byatt's proposals cover the five year period from 2000 to 2005. He conceded that after the one-off cut, bills may start rising in subsequent years to pay for an pounds 8.5bn programme of improvements in water quality.
But he said that even after this period, only customers of two companies - Northumbrian and Southern - should be facing higher water bills than they are likely to pay next year.
Mr Byatt said he was aware of concern in ministerial circles that customers could be confused by a price cut followed by subsequent increases. But he said: "Customers may feel that they would prefer to keep the money in their pockets rather than paying in advance for improved services."
Water UK, the body representing the country's water companies, said it was disappointed at the size of the one-off reduction and said Mr Byatt's sums did not add up.
Brian Duckworth, chairman of Water UK and managing director of Severn Trent, said:
"The Government wants us to deliver an ambitious environmental and quality programme, customers want it delivered and we want to deliver it but it has to be financed.
Common sense says you can't have more for less. Regardless of the position of individual companies the fact is that less cash means they'll have less ability to invest."
`Profits will fall', page 20
- 1 Al Pacino on suffering from depression: 'It can last and it's terrifying'
- 2 Half of young women unable to ‘locate vagina’ and 65% find it difficult to say the word
- 3 Saudis risk new Muslim division with proposal to move Mohamed’s tomb
- 4 A teacher speaks out: 'I'm effectively being forced out of a career that I wanted to love'
- 5 Mexican woman becomes world’s 'oldest person' at 127
Perez Hilton apologises for Jennifer Lawrence naked photo leak
Victoria Justice on naked photo leak: 'Let me nip this in the bud right now'
4Chan 'nude photo hacker' claims there are hundreds more celebrity images to be published
Saudis risk new Muslim division with proposal to move Mohamed’s tomb
Ariana Grande nude photos leak: 'These are completely fake' say singer's representatives
Rotherham child sex abuse scandal: Labour Home Office to be probed over what Tony Blair's government knew - and when
What do immigrants really think of Britain? Polish immigrant's Reddit post goes viral
Ashya King: Parents of five-year-old boy refused permission to visit him in hospital and denied bail at Spanish court
With Douglas Carswell joining Ukip, my party has taken another giant step forward
When elitism grips the top of British society to this extent, there is only one answer: abolish private schools
Ashya King: 'Cruel NHS has not given us the treatment we need', says father of five-year-old with brain tumour who fled to Spain
£40000 - £50000 per annum + benefits+bonus+package: Harrington Starr: SQL Impl...
£45000 - £55000 per annum + Benefits + Bonus: Harrington Starr: SQL Technical ...
£85000 per annum: Harrington Starr: Head of IT (Windows, Server, VMware, SAN, ...
£55000 - £60000 per annum + Benefits + Bonus: Harrington Starr: Lead C# Develo...