A statement of hope for the future of Lloyd's
Wednesday 24 May 1995
It has been clear for a long time that only the most radical plan would be able to save Lloyd's from being crushed beneath the burden of unpaid debts, mounting losses, and confidence-sapping litigation. David Rowland and Peter Middleton, to judge by their restructuring programme announced yesterday, have gone a good way to meeting these requirements, and deserve the credit for it. The complex plan to wipe the slate clean of Lloyd's pounds 6bn liabilities, settle all names' litigation with a promise that they can walk away from the nightmare of seemingly endless losses, and provide the basis for a "new Lloyd's" to trade profitably into the future, is only a blueprint. It is as much a rough guide to the sums needed as a statement of hope. But it is the first real indicator that Lloyd's has a serious chance of getting on top of its problems.
Yesterday's package, including a pounds 2.8bn settlement for names in an effort to persuade them to give up litigation, is also a vindication of those countless aggrieved investors who have fought hard - enduring vilification, threats and worse - to secure a better deal. It is not just the bad luck of natural disaster and the unforeseeable retrospective legislation in the US on asbestos claims that has ruined so many names. It is also greed and incompetence on a grand scale inside the market. Names are getting a better deal, and would be well advised to accept it with some modification. Most of the parties involved now appear to be heartily sick of the whole sordid affair, and the litigation whose main beneficiaries are lawyers.
That being said, some names may well want to argue about the fairness of the Lloyd's grand plan in the months of negotiations to come. Looking at the cash calls, it appears that Lloyd's is still looking after its own rather too well, at the expense of names. Agents, putting in a mere pounds 200m, are getting off very lightly. As for brokers and auditors, who have much to answer for, the fact that they are getting off scot free cannot be right. Some rebalancing of the burden must occur, if this plan is to succeed in making the new, rather than breaking the old, Lloyd's.
- 1 Nigel Farage: Me vs Russell Brand on Question Time – he's got the chest hair but where are his ideas?
- 2 Harry Potter fans can apply to the Hogwarts-inspired College of Wizardry
- 3 Jessica Chambers: 19-year-old woman 'doused with lighter fluid and burned alive' in the US
- 4 Russell Brand calls Nigel Farage 'poundshop Enoch Powell' in BBC Question Time debate
- 5 Orange Wednesdays are no more
Weather bomb in pictures: Storms cuts power for tens of thousands – and snow is on the way
Jessica Chambers: 19-year-old woman 'doused with lighter fluid and burned alive' in the US
Russell Brand calls Nigel Farage 'poundshop Enoch Powell' in BBC Question Time debate
Russell Brand was rendered speechless on Question Time by this man
Fury at Airbus after it hints the super-jumbo may be mothballed
Disgruntled RBS worker writes hilarious open letter to Russell Brand after anti-capitalist publicity stunt leaves him hungry
Nigel Farage defends Kerry Smith 'ch***y' comment: 'If you are going for a Chinese, what do you say you’re going for?'
Nigel Farage's approval rating hits 'record low' as popularity suffers in wake of Ukip sex scandal
Rozanne Duncan: Ukip expels councillor for 'jaw-dropping' comments made in BBC TV interview
Pakistan school attack live: Taliban kill at least 132 children in 'horrifying' massacre
Sony hack: Angelina Jolie branded 'seriously out of her mind' in further embarrassing leaked email saga
iJobs Money & Business
£43500 per annum + pension + holidays: The Jenrick Group: Night Shift Operatio...
£20000 - £25000 per annum + OTE £40,000 + Car + Pension: SThree: SThree are a ...
£20000 - £25000 per annum + OTE £35K: SThree: We consistently strive to be the...
£20000 - £25000 per annum + OTE £35000: SThree: SThree are a global FTSE 250 b...