Agency challenges water bill cuts
Monday 15 December 1997
The opinion poll research commissioned by the Environment Agency, the independently run body responsible for monitoring pollution and water quality, is expected to endorse overwhelmingly its claim that consumers would like more funds poured into discretionary improvement schemes.
The evidence gained from surveys of more than a thousand households, to be released on Wednesday, will be used by the agency to support its argument with Ian Byatt, the regulator, over the shape of the next five- year price formula which starts in 2000.
Mr Byatt wants to see a big, one-off cut in bills, similar to that imposed this year on the pipeline network of the former British Gas, to make up for low investment and big dividend increases by the privatised water groups.
The agency is preparing a shopping list of extra environmental improvements for the next price control, including additional spending on sewer overflows and reducing river extractions. Ed Gallagher, the agency's chief executive, believes the cash gained from these price cuts would be better spent on the environment, a battle his predecessor lost to Mr Byatt in the early 1990s in a high-profile feud.
Yesterday the agency declined to speculate on the results of the survey. However, it is thought to support "very strongly" Mr Gallagher's argument. The water companies are backing the agency's case, though critics argue they prefer bigger investment spending because they can find further cost savings from their budgets to pay out as dividends.
The debate will ultimately go to John Prescott, the Deputy Prime Minister, who has influence over how many of the improvement schemes are included in customer bills. However, Mr Byatt has sought to stamp his authority on the review, insisting that he has the final say over the way the price formula is calculated.
He said a fortnight ago that he did not believe Mr Prescott would attempt to force the regulator to abandon the principle of a big one-off price cut. "That's not what he will do because it's not proper or appropriate," said Mr Byatt.
The regulator said the price cut related to efficiency gains made during the current five-year formula. "That's my job and I must be able to do that independently. If I'm not able to do that then you've lost independent regulation," added Mr Byatt.
- 1 What happens to your body when you give up sugar?
- 2 Drugs Live cannabis trial: Hash is less harmful than any other drug, expert claims
- 3 Turkish Airlines flight TK 726 crash-lands on Nepal runway amid dense fog
- 4 Penis size: Study revealing 'what's normal' sends international media into meltdown
- 5 Have sex with your iPad thanks to the new sex toy no-one asked for
Turkish Airlines flight TK 726 crash-lands on Nepal runway amid dense fog
Ayesha Ali death: Mother and her girlfriend found guilty of manslaughter of eight-year-old
George Clooney and Amal fail to get special treatment at New York restaurant
Cindy Crawford 'un-PhotoShopped' viral Marie Claire image was doctored, claims photographer
'A girl is more responsible for rape than a boy': The statement that shocked the world... except India
Durham Free School: 'Creationism taught at' free school facing closure
Nearly 100,000 of Britain's poorest children go hungry after parents' benefits are cut
Ukip would cut billions from Scottish budget to fund English tax cuts
End of the licence fee: BBC to back radical overhaul of how it is funded
Ukraine crisis: Top Chinese diplomat backs Putin and says West should 'abandon zero-sum mentality'
Boris Nemtsov shot dead: Outspoken Putin critic who had expressed fears for his life is killed near the Kremlin
iJobs Money & Business
£25000 - £30000 per annum + benefits: Ashdown Group: A global leader operating...
Voluntary post, reasonable expenses reimbursed: Reach Volunteering: Would you ...
£36,000 - £40,000: Christine McCleave: Are you looking for a new opportunity a...
£15000 - £18000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: This is a great opportunity for...