BAe likely to fire the first shot
VSEL shareholders anticipate big gains in battle of the bids
Sunday 28 May 1995
GEC is almost certain to counter-bid, reigniting the battle that began earlier this year and was interrupted by a Monopolies & Mergers Commission inquiry.
Many in the City are surprised that neither side launched a bid last week, even though Michael Heseltine, President of the Board of Trade, gave both companies the go-ahead on Tuesday.
"BAe has no reason to delay any longer," said Sandy Morris, engineering analyst at NatWest Securities. "So far they have improved their image by their handling of this bid. They have been the aggressor all along. They would lose their advantage if they are now seen dithering and waiting around for GEC."
Observers close to BAe said the company's preparations for a bid appeared to be further advanced than those of GEC.
BAe's 3.3-for-one share offer valued VSEL shares at around pounds 14 when the MMC stepped in before Christmas. Because of a rise in the company's shares, however, the same bid would now be worth nearly pounds 18. This substantially increases the cost of a bid for GEC if it renews its purely cash offer.
One banker pointed out that VSEL is worth more than it was six months ago, because it is more financially robust. The balance sheet published last week showed it had cash of pounds 411m at the end of March, against pounds 360m six months earlier. VSEL has a healthy order book and is about to start building its first large surface warships for many years.
City analysts believe that the bidding could go to pounds 20 per share. "GEC would be stupid not to push it as far as possible even if BAe wins," said one observer. "Because of the tax advantages, BAe can probably afford to pay more for VSEL in the end."
VSEL is expected to keep to the stance it held during the previous bid battle - showing no preference for either side. "We would be equally happy with either," Lord Chalfont, the company's chairman, said last week. He acknowledged that this left shareholders with the happy prospect of watching a battle that is likely to increase the value of their holdings significantly.
Lord Chalfont also said he expected there to be further rationalisation in the defence industry, even if this led to a loss of domestic competition. "I think it's an inevitable trend," he said.
- 1 Three of Pope Francis' relatives die in Argentina car crash, including two young great-nephews
- 5 Cilla Black defends Cliff Richard: 'I am positive that the allegations are without foundation'
Syria conflict: President Assad finally turns on Isis as government steps up campaign against militant strongholds
Michael Brown shooting: Amnesty International sends team within US for first time as National Guard deployed
Ice Bucket Challenge: Lady Gaga, Justin Bieber and Oprah – the most entertaining reactions so far
Iraq crisis: Islamic State's message to America - 'We will drown you all in blood'
Ferguson: In the heartlands of America, a descent into madness
Isis threat: Cameron wants an alliance with Iran
Crisis? What crisis? A visiting US doctor gives the NHS a rave review
Ukip MEP calls for reintroduction of death penalty on fiftieth anniversary of last deaths
Russell Brand calls for Israel boycott: Comedian urges big businesses that 'facilitate the oppression of people in Gaza' to pull funding
Michael Brown shooting: Chaos erupts on the streets of Ferguson after autopsy shows teenager was shot six times – twice in the head
World peace? These are the only 11 countries in the world that are actually free from conflict
iJobs Money & Business
£200 - £290 per annum + competitive: Orgtel: Sales Performance Manager, Key Ba...
£25000 - £30000 per annum + bonus+benefits+package: Harrington Starr: Junior D...
£600 - £800 per day: Harrington Starr: Java/Calypso Developer Java, Calypso, ...
£700 per day: Harrington Starr: Quantitative Developer C++, Python, STL, R, PD...