BT set to sue over windfall levy
Sunday 29 June 1997
Senior executives are privately fuming that BT is being brought within the scope of the windfall tax, to be outlined during this week's Budget, but they have agreed that they will only challenge the liability if it is represents a material cost to shareholders.
BT is upset because it was assured privately by Prime Minister Tony Blair, before the General Election, that any exposure to the windfall tax would be minimal.
However, legal difficulties in drafting a framework for imposition of the windfall tax have made it impossible to make any allowance for special pleadings.
Senior Treasury officials are extremely nervous about potential legal challenges to the windfall tax, and they have insisted that it must be applied consistently across the target companies. As the biggest business BT faces the biggest liability.
BT chairman Sir Iain Vallance made his opposition to the windfall tax plain last month when he said he would not have voted for the Labour Party at the General Election if he had thought BT would be hit by the tax.
"If we are stung in a big way for this tax and if it can be challenged legally, we owe it to our shareholders to challenge it," Sir Iain said.
Reports last week suggested that BT could face a liability of pounds 1bn as part of the Chancellor's plans to raise pounds 5bn from the windfall tax. BT regard a bill of that magnitude as unacceptable and will feel obliged to fight it on behalf of shareholders in the courts.
Lawyers representing BT have been scouring domestic and EU legislation and have concluded that their most fruitful line of attack would be to use EU state aid laws to fight the windfall tax. Because Mercury, BT's domestic telephone competitor, will not have to pay a windfall levy lawyers argue that the tax on BT is in effect illegal state aid for Mercury.
BT is not the only company contemplating a legal challenge to the windfall tax. A consensus has emerged among the privatised businesses facing the tax that they will fight its imposition if the amount of the levy is too high.
BAA, the airports operator, which has lost it battle to be excluded, has indicated that despite its doubts about the applicability of a windfall tax it will pay up unless the liability is excessive. However, it has undertaken extensive legal research which would allow it to act swiftly if its tax charge is too high.
One electricity company, which preferred to remain anonymous, said it would mount a challenge if its liability was much in excess of pounds 50m.
- 1 This 'woman calls police to order pizza' story isn't going where you're expecting
- 2 Axe wielding man shot dead after attacking four New York policemen on busy street
- 3 Watch what happened when food critics were unknowingly served McDonald's
- 4 Jimmy Carr's Oscar Pistorius joke goes a bit too far at the Q Awards
- 5 Ottawa shootings: Bruce MacKinnon's cartoon is the perfect tribute to soldier Nathan Cirillo
Of course, teenage girls need role models – but not like beauty vlogger Zoella
Cameron is warned 'no possibility' of UK reducing immigration and that bid to bring in quota on migrant workers would be illegal
Support for EU membership 'at highest level since 1991' with most Brits wanting to stay 'in'
Thousands with degenerative conditions classified as 'fit to work in future' – despite no possibility of improvement
Attacks on 'Ukip Calypso' show how skewed people’s priorities are
Poppy Appeal 2014: This is why I won't be wearing a red poppy this year
iJobs Money & Business
£60000 per annum: Ashdown Group: Compensation and Benefits Manager - Compensat...
£30000 - £35000 Per Annum plus excellent benefits: Clearwater People Solutions...
£24000 - £28000 per annum + bonus & benefits: Ashdown Group: IT Business Syste...
£50000 - £90000 per annum + benefits: Ampersand Consulting LLP: Markit EDM (CA...