Comment: Business should still be suspicious of Blair
Wednesday 09 April 1997
The more interesting question about Labour and business, however, is whether Labour when in power is going to be the party of small or big business. There's an important difference here, for the interests of the two are often not the same and sometimes diametrically opposed. The rhetoric, from Tony Blair at least, is that Labour is the party of small business, which would imply a vigorous competition policy. But what little action and defined policy there's been so far would rather indicate the contrary - Labour as the party of big business and the corporate state. This would imply that the interests of domestic competition will always take second place to those of Britain's big business national champions.
The most glaring example of this so far is Mr Blair's "deal" with British Telecom under which BT gets early release from restrictions on its freedom to offer broadcast TV across the network in return for wiring up schools and other public institutions to the superhighway. Both Labour and BT are these days keen to play down the significance of the arrangement, but there is none the less little doubt that BT expects a very sympathetic hearing from a Labour government, not just on this issue but on a number of other fronts as well.
There are some important tests for Labour looming almost immediately it gets into power. First there is the Monopolies and Mergers Commission report on gas charges. Will Labour want to back the hardline consumerist stance of Clare Spottiswoode, the gas regulator, or does it have some sympathy for TransCo's plight? If it wants gas included in the windfall profits tax, something is going to have to be left in the kitty. Another test comes from the MMC report on whether to allow further consolidation in the brewing industry. And just how wedded and glued is Labour to the cause of competition in the gas and electricity market? Not very, seems to be the answer.
Tony Blair's talk of "partnership" with business should send out the strongest possible warning signals. It is not the function of government to set up exclusive "you scratch my back and I'll scratch your back" arrangements with companies and business. The proper function of Government is to provide a stable economy for business to flourish in and a set of rules and regulations to ensure fair play. It is to be hoped that this is what Labour does stand for, but there are good grounds for suspicion.
- 1 President of Argentina adopts Jewish godson to 'stop him turning into a werewolf'
- 2 ALS ice bucket challenge co-founder Corey Griffin drowns, aged 27
- 3 The 'Black Museum': After 150 years, public set to see exhibits from police’s grisly crime museum
President of Argentina adopts Jewish godson to 'stop him turning into a werewolf'
Exclusive: Abusers using spyware apps to monitor partners reaches 'epidemic proportions'
ALS ice bucket challenge co-founder Corey Griffin drowns, aged 27
UK weather: Warning for more snow and ice as freezing temperatures and gales hit Britain
Stoke-on-Trent becomes first British city to be classified as 'disaster resilient' by the United Nations
British actor Idris Elba cannot star as James Bond because he is black, says shock jock Rush Limbaugh
Ukip member gets into Christmas spirit with Union Flag plea to Santa 'for our country back'
Germany anti-Islam protests: 17,000 march on Dresden against 'Islamification of the West'
Millions of Britons struggling to feed themselves and facing malnourishment
Immigrants make UK racist, says Ukip councillor Trevor Shonk
Nigel Farage: Ukip leader named 'Briton of the year' by The Times
iJobs Money & Business
Not specified: Selby Jennings: VP/SVP Credit Quant Top tier investment bank i...
Not specified: Selby Jennings: Quantitative Research | Global Equity | New Yor...
Not specified: Selby Jennings: SVP Model Validation This top tiered investment...
Highly Competitive: Selby Jennings: Our client, a leading European Oil trading...