Banks could be wiped out by the 'role-based allowances'
Outlook London's banks, with no small encouragement from City watchdogs, have been canny in coming up with ways around the hated European bonus cap. They have alighted upon the idea of "role-based allowances" – payments that are supposedly not based on the individual bankers' performance, but on a wider measure, such as the state of the general economy.
They're a way of continuing to pay monster packages to bankers in the good times, while allowing the banks flexibility to reduce them in the downturns. As far as the company's cash flow goes, in other words, they effectively work like bonuses.
That doesn't wash with the spirit of EU's stipulations. The EU clearly wanted to see bankers' pay move into line with the rest of the world – that is to say, overwhelmingly dominated by a fixed salary. Given that some European jurisdictions are going out of their way to fill in such loopholes with reinforced regulatory concrete, expect some loud carping in Brussels at London's role-based wheezes. Despite those harrumphs, however, Britain's banks will probably get away with it. The EU has plenty of bigger disagreements with Westminster to get knicker-twisted about.
But employment lawyers see further potential problems (or, for them, opportunities) arising in a few years' time; specifically, when it comes to sacking bank staff in the next recession. You see, redundancy pay-offs are generally calculated on a ratio of salary multiplied by number of years worked. Given that salaries have historically been a relatively small proportion of overall pay, that has allowed the banks to keep the golden goodbyes under control.
But what about role-based allowances? Employers hope they will not count as salary when the redundancy rounds come up, but specialist lawyers are less convinced. They reckon, with a prevailing wind and a friendly judge, a decent QC could succeed in arguing that pay not based on personal performance is salary, whatever it says on the label.
Barclays yesterday said it had to pay big to prevent it being plunged into a "death spiral" triggered by staff being poached. But if banks don't write their new contracts carefully enough, they could face themselves being wiped out by paying people to leave.
- 1 Russell Brand accuses FOX News anchor Sean Hannity of terrorism after aggressive Israel-Gaza debate
- 2 Pope Francis issues top 10 tips for happiness – including don’t try to convert other people
- 3 Disney heiress Abigail disowns her share of family profits in West Bank company
- 4 The secret report that helps Israel hide facts
- 5 Israel's propaganda machine is finally starting to misfire
Russell Brand accuses FOX News anchor Sean Hannity of terrorism after aggressive Israel-Gaza debate
Pope Francis issues top 10 tips for happiness – including don’t try to convert other people
Sabina Altynbekova, the girl branded 'too good looking' for volleyball, says social media obsession with her is a 'bit much'
Justin Bieber posts Instagram photo of Orlando Bloom crying after Ibiza fight 'over Miranda Kerr'
Disney heiress Abigail disowns her share of family profits in West Bank company
The secret report that helps Israel hide facts
Land for gas: Merkel and Putin discussed secret deal could end Ukraine crisis
Woman and two children killed by mob in riots over 'blasphemous' Facebook post in Pakistan
A day in the life of Vladimir Putin: The dictator in his labyrinth
Putin is 'thuggish, dishonest and reckless', says British ambassador to US
Richard Dawkins tweets: 'Date rape is bad, stranger rape is worse'
- < Previous
- Next >
iJobs Money & Business
£20000 - £24000 per annum: Harrington Starr: A leading provider of web based m...
£28000 - £32000 per annum: Ashdown Group: Secretary (Sales Team Support) - Mat...
Competitive (DOE): Guru Careers: We are looking for an Assistant Management Ac...
£600 - £700 per day + competitive: Orgtel: Senior Investment Accounting Change...