David Prosser: Let's hear the Rolls-Royce roar
Outlook Qantas's launch of legal action against Rolls-Royce yesterday provided critics of the British engineering company with fresh ammunition. They question whether Rolls-Royce has taken a sufficiently tight grip of what could still be a public relations disaster.
Those who equate Rolls-Royce's problems with the fate that befell BP earlier this year exaggerate the point. No one has died and there has been no environmental disaster. And while Rolls-Royce's share price has fallen since the Qantas incident, there has hardly been the sort of collapse we saw at BP, not least because a string of lucrative new contracts have been unveiled. Indeed, Qantas's first legal claim yesterday was not sufficient to stop Rolls-Royce shares rising.
And yet the radio silence from the company remains deafening. True, it did make a statement yesterday specifically addressing the findings of an Australian safety board's review, but there was no attempt to counter the Qantas threat. Right from the moment news broke that a Qantas plane had been forced to make an emergency landing because of a failure in a Rolls-Royce engine, the company's executives have been conspicuous by their absence.
This is the way Rolls-Royce operates from Sir John Rose, its chief executive, down. Discretion is often admirable, but companies also have a duty to explain themselves – not least for the sake of their shareholders. Having surrendered the airwaves during this episode, Rolls-Royce may find it tough to get on the front foot if matters take a turn for the worse.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies