David Prosser: No justice in handing Fred the Shred to the lynch mob
Friday 03 December 2010
Outlook They were mad, not bad. That is how one might summarise the view taken by the Financial Services Authority in deciding not to take any further action against Sir Fred Goodwin and his fellow directors at Royal Bank of Scotland, despite the way they ran their bank aground.
No surprise that the FSA's announcement yesterday sparked howls of protest. It may now be two years since public anger saw vandals attack Sir Fred's Edinburgh home, but the banking crisis has not been forgotten, let alone forgiven. How could it be with most of the country now facing up to the hardship of repaying the debts run up during the crisis while bankers prepare for another bumper pay round?
Still, the regulator has made the right decision. It has spent 17 months searching for grounds to bring legal action against Sir Fred and his former colleagues. If none were found, then action could not be taken, public outrage notwithstanding.
The FSA has accepted its share of the blame for the financial crisis. But though it clearly failed to supervise many of our leading banks, it was not responsible for the legislation governing malfeasance. It is unfair to attack the regulator now for the fact there is no case to bring under this legislation.
However, one aspect of the FSA's decision is peculiar. Though the regulator made it clear yesterday that future applications from any of the major players in the RBS collapse for positions of influence in the City would be viewed pretty dimly, it has stopped short of outright bans. Why has it not sought the same sort of deal for Sir Fred as it agreed with Johnny Cameron, RBS's former investment banking chief, who has promised never to take another full-time role in financial services?
It is also disappointing that the FSA feels unable to publish the report it compiled during its investigation of RBS. Those who are angry about the actions of RBS are not entitled to sacrificial lambs, but they do deserve a full account of why the regulator has reached the decision it has.
- 1 Raif Badawi, the Saudi Arabian blogger sentenced to 1,000 lashes, may now face death penalty
- 2 PornHub turns masturbation into energy in bid to save the planet
- 3 Robert Mugabe eats a zoo for 'obscene' 91st birthday party
- 4 The remarkable archaeological underwater discovery that could open up a new chapter in the study of European and British prehistory
- 5 The jihadi girls who went to Syria weren't just radicalised by Isis — they were groomed
Stephen Hawking's wife Jane Wilde on their marriage breakdown: 'The family were left behind'
Raif Badawi, the Saudi Arabian blogger sentenced to 1,000 lashes, may now face death penalty
Someone has actually got a tattoo of that dress
PornHub turns masturbation into energy in bid to save the planet
White and gold or blue and black – what colour is the dress? An eyewitness gives a definitive answer
New theory could prove how life began and disprove God
This is what it's like to be dead, according to a guy who died for a bit
'Jihadi John': CAGE representative storms off Sky News accusing Kay Burley of Islamophobia
Ukip would cut billions from Scottish budget to fund English tax cuts
Russia's roadmap for annexing eastern Ukraine 'leaked from Vladimir Putin's office'
Ukraine crisis: Top Chinese diplomat backs Putin and says West should 'abandon zero-sum mentality'
iJobs Money & Business
£22000 per annum + pension,bonus,career progression: Ashdown Group: An establi...
£40000 - £50000 per annum + pro rata: SThree: SThree Group have been well esta...
£30000 - £37000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: Established in 1999, a highly r...
£250-£300 Day Rate: Jemma Gent: Are you a qualified accountant with strong exp...