David Prosser: Searching for the high-water mark in the second dot.com boom
Thursday 19 May 2011
Outlook LinkedIn, the social networking site for professionals that is to make its debut on the New York Stock Exchange today, rather undersold itself when it unveiled plans for the float earlier this month. Pricing was originally set at $32 to $35 a share, valuing the business at $3bn – now, just a few weeks later, LinkedIn has priced the shares at $45, valuing the company at $4.3bn (£2.66bn).
What happened during the first half of May to prompt a 30 per cent increase in the value of LinkedIn? Well, nothing material, that's for sure. The uplift simply reflects the demand for LinkedIn shares that the company's advisers are seeing as they sell its story.
Maybe investors are right to be clambering over one another to secure a slice of LinkedIn. But they might want to consider a little nugget of research conducted by the Wall Street Journal yesterday. Struck by that 30 per cent uplift in LinkedIn's pricing, the Journal went looking for the last time a company bumped up its valuation so dramatically during the short period between announcing its intention to float and coming to market. The answer was that there has been nothing comparable for just over 11 years – since the IPO of the communications company ArrowPoint, in fact, which bumped up its valuation by more than 90 per cent as it prepared to float.
ArrowPoint's IPO was finalised on 9 March 2000; two days later, Nasdaq peaked and the dot.com bubble popped.
This is not to say that LinkedIn's float will presage a similar correction. But it is worth noting again that internet stock valuations have seen a dramatic rise over the past two years, just as they did during the dot.com phenomenon – and that just like then, prices are rising at a much faster rate than these businesses' performance would appear to justify.
To take the LinkedIn example, the latest price range puts the company on a ratio of around 90 times last year's earnings. Assuming its earnings have been rising at a consistent pace, the actual figure today might be closer to 60 times. That's above even the highest multiple so far accorded to Facebook, generally the pace-setter in the latest online boom (and it is twice the multiple given to Google when it floated in 2004, even though its earnings were growing more quickly).
In the end, LinkedIn is worth whatever investors are prepared to pay for it. The same is true for Groupon, Facebook or any of the other hot internet businesses moving closer to a float. Just don't be too surprised if investors are not prepared to pay anywhere near as much in a year or two from now.
- 1 Russell Brand says he will 'probably' give up acting to focus on his revolution
- 2 Watch what happened when food critics were unknowingly served McDonald's
- 3 David Beckham's Haig Club whisky is exactly what’s wrong with the Highlands
- 4 Queen's first tweet: Reply telling Her Majesty to 'f*** off' broadcast on BBC News
- 5 #AskNigelFarage: Twitter starts hilarious Q&A for Ukip leader
Of course, teenage girls need role models – but not like beauty vlogger Zoella
Support for EU membership 'at highest level since 1991' with most Brits wanting to stay 'in'
Tony Blair 'says Ed Miliband will lose 2015 general election'
Thousands with degenerative conditions classified as 'fit to work in future' – despite no possibility of improvement
Putin: The US is to blame for almost all the world's major conflicts
Poppy Appeal 2014: This is why I won't be wearing a red poppy this year
iJobs Money & Business
£60000 per annum: Ashdown Group: Compensation and Benefits Manager - Compensat...
£30000 - £35000 Per Annum plus excellent benefits: Clearwater People Solutions...
£24000 - £28000 per annum + bonus & benefits: Ashdown Group: IT Business Syste...
£50000 - £90000 per annum + benefits: Ampersand Consulting LLP: Markit EDM (CA...