James Moore: Insurers cost drivers and themselves money with their own incompetence
Outlook Who to believe? The Office of Fair Trading lambasted motor insurers yesterday for overcharging customers to the tune of £225m. But just a day earlier Investec's insurance analyst produced a report calling the industry "inherently unprofitable" and advising clients to sell Admiral, a notable exception until the wheels started to fall off last year.
Could it be that someone's numbers don't add up?
Right-wing critics, who believe that trade should be free but not fair, will point to the OFT. They'll accuse the watchdog's "communist staff" of unjustly squeezing the industry. What else should one expect from an organisation whose chief economist was once the lead singer of, ahem, Talulah Gosh, an indie band popular in the late 1980s with a certain type of floppy-fringed student.
Left-wing critics will beg to differ, suggesting that the problem lies with the worthy analyst's analysis, which they will probably see as typically City. Just look at the way premiums have been soaring, they'll say. The consumer is clearly being ripped off because of profiteering.
Actually the OFT, floppy fringes and all, and Investec's analyst are both right.
Premiums are up and profits down for the same reason: the ballooning cost of dealing with accidents.
In recent months the finger has been pointed at the rise in allegedly false whiplash-related compensation claims. That, however, is a sideshow. Unnecessary costs start ticking up as soon as the mangled wreckage has been towed from the scene of a smash.
Insurers for the victims rack them up by using favoured credit hire companies to supply courtesy cars (often for longer than necessary), favoured garages to handle repairs (at inflated costs) and favoured lawyers to handle those compo claims (ditto). No control is exerted because everything can be recovered from the guilty party's insurers.
It doesn't seem to matter to those victims' insurers that they could be on the other side of this process through insuring an at-fault driver two miles down the road. Quite often they'll actually be on both sides of the same smash. With no discernable impact on those costs.
The lack of profitability identified by Investec and the overcharging by the OFT is caused by the same thing: the incompetence of the people who run insurance companies. Sadly, it will take more than the OFT's provisional referral to the Competition Commission to fix that.
- 1 Malaysian cyclist could face disciplinary action after 'Save Gaza' gloves protest
- 2 Is Gideon Levy the most hated man in Israel or just the most heroic?
- 3 Fifty Shades of Grey trailer provokes moral outrage from US parenting groups
- 4 McDonald’s removes chicken nuggets from the menu in Hong Kong amid major food scare
- 5 Students offered grants if they tweet pro-Israeli propaganda
The 'scroungers’ fight back: The welfare claimants battling to alter stereotypes
Arizona execution lasts two hours as killer Joseph Wood left 'snorting and gasping' for air
Malaysia Airlines MH17 crash: Ukrainian military jet was flying close to passenger plane before it was shot down, says Russian officer
Malaysia Airlines MH17 crash: Massive rise in sale of British arms to Russia
Malaysia Airlines MH17 crash: victims’ bodies bundled in black bags and loaded onto trains
John Barrowman praised for Commonwealth Games opening ceremony gay kiss
iJobs Money & Business
£600 - £650 per day: Orgtel: Conduct Risk Liaison Manager - Banking - London -...
£18000 - £23000 per annum + Comission: SThree: SThree, International Recruitme...
£280 - £300 per day + competitive: Orgtel: Test Analyst, Edinburgh, Credit Ris...
£20000 - £25000 per annum + OTE £40,000: SThree: SThree Group have been well e...