James Moore: Why RBS is right to bank on an insider as it seeks its new man at the top
Outlook: An internal candidate like McEwan knows where all the bodies are buried
It seems Royal Bank of Scotland is engaged in a little “market testing” as it tries to find a replacement for its chief executive Stephen Hester, ousted in rather murky circumstances to the City’s chagrin last month.
Here’s how it works: You put the name out there (in this case it’s Kiwi Ross McEwan who joined last year) and wait for the response. If it’s generally positive, your guy gets hired. Less so and it’s time for Plan B.
The tactic is not strictly legitimate. It used to happen all the time with mergers and acquisitions until the regulators called time on it. But with the hiring process, even though it is price-sensitive, it is still possible to get away with it with the tolerance of regulators, if not their endorsement.
When you have a leading shareholder (the Government) that is acutely sensitive to the public and media moods, as well as the City mood, it’s a sensible tactic.
This is why the name of Mr McEwan, below, was being touted around yesterday.
To be fair, he drew a fairly positive response. Ian Gordon, Investec’s banking analyst, who is generally willing to tell it like he sees it regardless of whether this makes him unpopular with the powers that be, described the reports linking Mr McEwan with the job as “extremely encouraging”.
He may well be right. Mr McEwan is an internal candidate and this was probably always the way the way it was going to go. Sir Philip Hampton, and indeed the Government, may well have liked the idea of a flashy external hire, particularly going into a privatisation process where they’d serve as a carrot to tempt big investors: “Look who we’ve got to run our bank!”
However, an internal candidate who knows the business, the people, and, crucially, where the bodies are buried, is in reality much the better bet. They should also come cheaper, and that’s the sort of thing that would play very well with the wider public. The importance of that shouldn’t be under-estimated. RBS is still something of a toxic brand. Spending big money on an external CEO could easily send any progress that has been made with changing the public’s perceptions about the bank into reverse, thus wiping out all of the benefits an external name might bring.
- 1 If you weren't afraid of flying before last week... you probably are now
- 2 Israel-Gaza conflict: The secret report that helps Israelis to hide facts
- 3 Students offered grants if they tweet pro-Israeli propaganda
- 4 Lauren Goodger calls for tougher laws on revenge porn after sex tape leaks online
- 5 Iraq crisis: End 'very near' for Christianity after Isis takeover, says Bishop
Israel-Gaza conflict: The secret report that helps Israelis to hide facts
A day in the life of Vladimir Putin: The dictator in his labyrinth
Opponents of Israel's military operation in Gaza are the real enemies of Middle Eastern peace
Were 'Poor Doors' added to mixed developments so wealthy residents don't have to go in alongside social housing tenants?
Arizona execution lasts two hours as killer Joseph Wood left 'snorting and gasping' for air
Malaysia Airlines MH17 crash: Massive rise in sale of British arms to Russia
iJobs Money & Business
£40000 - £45000 per annum: Ashdown Group: An established professional services...
£600 - £650 per day: Orgtel: Conduct Risk Liaison Manager - Banking - London -...
£18000 - £23000 per annum + Comission: SThree: SThree, International Recruitme...
£280 - £300 per day + competitive: Orgtel: Test Analyst, Edinburgh, Credit Ris...