Banks set to agree £50bn package
Exclusive: Jeremy Warner on how a dramatic meeting in Downing Street is likely to lead to £50bn recapitalisation package - and why it may not be enough.
Tuesday, 7 October 2008
UK banks are set to agree a £50bn injection of taypayers' money under a bold plan to resolve the crisis in credit markets. Banking chiefs were this evening due to meet the Prime Minister to discuss the proposals, scheduled to be announced tomorrow morning, but subject to seeing the detail, are understood to have already agreed to be supportive. The plan could mean substantial dilution for some shareholders.
Sir Fred Goodwin's top bullet point in his slide presentation to the Merrill Lynch banking conference in London this morning was: "The outlook is subdued". Even by the notoriously phlegmatic standards of the Royal Bank of Scotland chief executive, this was something of an understatement. In fact the outlook is truly dire, as one glance at Sir Fred's plummeting share price reveals - at the close it was down by nearly 40 per cent to a fifteen year low of less than a pound. RBS was not alone. Halifax Bank of Scotland shares were down by a similar order of magnitude.
If there wasn't already a retail and wholesale run on these banks, there would have been by the time everyone had clocked the meltdown in share prices. Quite who was responsible for this latest, calamitous collapse in confidence scarcely seems to matter any more. Was it cack-handed briefing by the Treasury, or merely confidence sapping guesswork and speculation? Certainly it conforms to the Treasury's inept handling of this crisis from the start, where kite-flying and leaks over the Government's response have only succeeded in making a bad situation infinitely worse.
Who knows? What's important is that the Government is now seen to act, and despite the denials and hand-wringing, a substantial injection of taxpayers' money into the banking system now seems an inevitable part of the policy response and may even be announced in the morning. Again, if the recapitalisation hadn't been decided on before, it will have been by now. These stories have a habit of becoming self-fulfilling. Expect a stock exchange announcement first thing tomorrow.
I think we can be reasonably clear about how it's all going to work. One way or another, the weaker banks are going to be forced to sign up to recapitalisation whether they like it or not. Policymakers have taken the view that it has to be all for one and one for all. There's no point in a piecemeal approach as this will only switch the confidence issue from one bank to another.
Even Barclays, hitherto fiercely resistant to the idea that it needs more capital having only recently committed itself to a dividend increase, seems to have dropped its objections and is prepared to be supportive. A one size fits all approach would be acceptable to Barclays if it helps restore confidence in the banking system. As things stand, there is a high chance of a domino effect of failing banks. Once the markets have finished with one bank, they merely move on to another. If a bank as big as Royal Bank of Scotland were to start failing, all banks would eventually get sucked into the hole. An industry wide solution is therefore called for.
One reasonably eloquent way in which this might be achieved, which would address the problem apparent from the reaction of individual banks yesterday - that some of them still regard it as unnecessary and don't want to do it - would be to make in mandatory on UK banks to raise their so-called tier one equity capital ratios to 7 per cent or more.
The Treasury would stand ready to provide the money that would enable this to happen. In return, the taxpayer would get convertible preference shares on favourable terms.
Such an approach would leave the better capitalised banks - HSBC and Santander, where there is no perceived problem - free of interference. Only RBS, Barclays, HBOS and Lloyds would be caught by the edict. Can the UK Government do this unilaterally? The time for international convention on these matters seems to have passed. Each country must do what it can to bolster confidence in its banking system.
Exaggerated media reports that Sir Fred had begged the Government on bended knee for a massive capital injection certainly played their part in today's further, catastrophic collapse in bank share prices. Anything now seems to go in reporting on the affairs of banks, with even the most ill informed of briefings and rumours - many of which would in more normal times have been regarded as virtually actionable - now seen as fair game for publishing and spun as gospel truth.
Since the damage is now done, here's my penny's worth to add to the growing weight of negative speculation. According to one of the stories circulating in the market yesterday, so challenging did RBS's funding difficulties become late last week in its US retail banking division that it was forced to seek emergency assistance from the Bank of England on top of the liquidity available through generally available channels. Believe it if you will.
Whatever its validity, stories such as these have been piling the pressure on the Government to come up with an urgent, bold and immediate response. Recapitalisation on its own won't work. Indeed there is some danger than taxpayers' will only be throwing good money after the bad which has already been squandered. Yet in conjunction with a state guarantee of deposits, as announced by Ireland and others, deep cuts in interest rates, and further injections of liquidity, it might just succeed in putting a floor under the British banking system and halt the process of "deleveraging" which is threatening to undermine economic activity.
-
Print Article
-
Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2008 Independent News and Media Limited

Comments
27 Comments
this will apparently go on and on until the government itself goes bankrupt and then what? who is going to repay the debt?
let the bank go bust as the free market defines its system.
Posted by ebbi | 09.10.08, 22:24 GMT
This started with Housing, and it will end with housing.
When crappy terraced houses are being sold for £350k now, when they were sold for £60k in 2000.
They could drop by 50% and still no FTB would go near them.
Posted by Daniel | 08.10.08, 10:47 GMT
Guaranteeing the deposits of all savers, with no upper limit, together with raising the base rate to protect Sterling would stop any likelihood of a run on British banks and obviate any 'need' for a taxpayer bailout.
Posted by Paul | 08.10.08, 07:26 GMT
Why not just let the lame banks go bust, like B&B, NR, HBOS and RBS, and then we'd be left with proper banks like HSBC. Simple, and would have saved the taxpayer something like 450bn quid. Oh, and don't forget to let houses drop by 75%, cuz that's what started all this.
This additional 50bn will last the week, and then back to square one. What with the threat of lowering interest rates, this so called government are determined to inflate away my savings. Thanks Gordon.
praxis22, you are Alistair Darling and I claim my 10 pounds.
Posted by Np | 08.10.08, 01:34 GMT
My only hope is that is is not as illegal as the USA stick up. I mean Bailout.
Somehow I doubt it.
Posted by Denzil | 08.10.08, 01:20 GMT
I cannot afford to pay any extra tax. I am already Taxed to the hilt. After the dust settles, when each of us is faced with an extra £2,500 tax increase, which is roughly what this will cost each of us.
What do I do?
I cannot pay that much extra tax.
I never got onto the housing market so I am not one of the lucky ones who has seen their house triple in value.
And frankly, like most people, I do not understand all of this.
Its just not right.
I will be forced fiddle my taxes in a big way, because I will be facing bankruptcy, being evicted and becoming homeless.
All we hear is its in our interests to 'bail them out'
But is it really?
The CML, should be in prison. The entire system is totally morally bankrupt, flawed and crooked.
Thats what got us here.
So why keep it?
Civil disobedience is the only way forward. Of course, If i dont pay the extra thousands in tax, then it will be me who goes to prison.
Result? I hate the government with a passion.
Posted by Daniel | 08.10.08, 00:29 GMT
The culture of spin and briefing of this government is horrendous.You can't run Treasury as you run any other goofy departments and should stay away from the press as far as possible.Tories also played their part.Cameron's article in FT is unnecessary.What is now important is to bring the balance sheet of the banks in line and put strict accountancy rule.In due course after recapitalisation, liquidation and rate cut what must be done is slim down the troubled bank like RBS, selling their investment banking, asset management to other banks.London is a important financial centre thru' which international capital flows. Finance Services holds third of our GDP.It is very crucial not to undermine that either by regulating for past mistake or not regulating at all.There must be a balance.According to the latest survey, Hong Kong and Singapore waiting to knock London as a financial centre.It is a clearly a challenge for Brown.There is a nice yankee expression"Every Challenge is a Opportunity"
Posted by Mujib | 07.10.08, 23:23 GMT
What will it cost us in the end, and what must we do to prevent this happening again. Leaving the same Banks and Management may cause a re-run every few months.
Posted by James | 07.10.08, 23:08 GMT
If the banks need to preserver "a bit of cash" then they could always stop the dividends, stop bonuses, and limit salaries. And ask current shareholders for more money via a warrant issue. At at suitable price even my mom would buy some shares in a bank, but not until the Directors get their affairs in order.
Posted by J Lee | 07.10.08, 22:09 GMT
So, Uk tax payer ends up owning part of Lehman Bros then? How eliptic!
Posted by Lilly Evans | 07.10.08, 21:52 GMT
27 Comments