Jeremy Warner: If Brown doesn't act now, he may be forced to later
Monday, 6 October 2008
It's every country for itself, it seems. Less that a day after leaders of Europe's four biggest economies agreed to co-ordinate their response to the growing banking crisis, Germany has unilaterally announced that it is guaranteeing the deposits of all its major banks, action which when taken by Ireland and Greece last week prompted fierce criticism from Germany.
There were few details last night, but Angela Merkel, the German Chancellor, was unambiguous in her comments about underwriting private savers. The situation must have been dire for Ms Merkel to cut across the promise of a co-ordinated European policy response. The European Central Bank is thought to have tackled the crisis well so far, but there is still no centralised treasury function in Europe to stand behind the banking system when it begins to splinter.
Germany appears to be guaranteeing only retail savings, about €568bn, rather than all the liabilities, which are considerably higher. Its actions are therefore not quite as all-encompassing as Ireland's, which has guaranteed all deposits, retail, wholesale and commercial. In fact, Ms Merkel is only making explicit something which has always been implicit, namely that no major European economy is going to allow its depositors to lose money in a banking crisis. Even so, Britain is under intense pressure to follow suit so as to avoid a flight of money into countries where governments have announced a guarantee. The political judgement Mr Brown must make is that if he doesn't act immediately, it's going to look bad if he's later forced into it by a run on the British banking system.
The UK Government may now have no option. If it guaranteed all banking liabilities, the taxpayer would be liable for some £2 trillion of bank deposits, including current accounts, corporate deposits and retail savings. At more than one and a half times annual economic output, this would be a huge and unprecedented contingent liability to add to the country's books. The international composition of most of Britain's leading banks also considerably complicates matters. Would the taxpayer be guaranteeing only the UK liabilities of banks based in Britain, or all their liabilities worldwide? If only the former, it might not necessarily solve the problem, as foreign depositors might continue to withdraw their funds, increasing the risk to the British taxpayer of the UK guarantee.
The UK Government has already come close to making such a guarantee. Only last Friday, Alistair Darling, the Chancellor, said that the deposits of any bank that ran into liquidity difficulties would be guaranteed. An all-embracing guarantee may now be an essential first step to restoring confidence in the system. One plan being studied by the Treasury is for the Government to take stakes in UK banks in return for helping them. This might also contribute to the process of recapitalisation of the banking system, another precursor to the restoration of confidence.
-
Print Article
-
Email Article
-
Click here for copyright permissions
Copyright 2008 Independent News and Media Limited

For the past 12 months we have been in the wake of events, trundling along like some errant child in the grip of his mothers hand, crossing the busy road.
It's now time to grow up fast and get on the inside of the curve. Instead of reacting to events, we need to get ahead of the game.
Thing are serious, so serious, the western worlds entire banking system is about to disappear down the drain.
It's not about stocks and shares anymore! Nor even money and banks. It's about food and starvation en-mass in the streets.
No banking, no food...and unless we get ahead of the game, we're all heading to hell in a bath tub.
Happy Crimbo
Posted by David Downes | 06.10.08, 21:09 GMT
The only "solution" which will work is to set a floor price for Bank assets. This may be only 50% of book value, but otherwise you cannot re-capitalise from a continually sinking asset base.
Posted by R Newton | 06.10.08, 17:52 GMT
today's lesson was brought to you by the words wind ,the,urinating & against tomorrow's special guest "aagh!".
Posted by Richard B | 06.10.08, 16:27 GMT
BBc report this story as untrue- no such German guarantee given.
Posted by M Reid | 06.10.08, 11:03 GMT
State recapitalisation will be required, but is it too soon. I think it will only be effective when effects of the crash are actually obvious in the economy as a whole.
The BOE will have to continue to pump liquidity into the money market even if effectively the only source of money for the entire banking system via the Extended Collateral Long-Term Repo Operations.
When the solvency level of the banks can to sensibly guessed at, then and only then, does it make sense to proceed with state recapitalisation.
Incidentally I agree with Vince Cable that the Darling should suspend BOE independence to direct a 2% cut in interest rates: even allowing for the relative levels of LIBOR above base rate, it will help to keep the banks solvent. The pathetic 0.25% or 0.50% base rate cut expected on Wednesday will just make Darling look like a rabbit caught in the headlights, again
Posted by Bryan McGrath | 06.10.08, 10:40 GMT
The obvious problem is Gordon dithers. At a time like this we need someone competent and decisive - and seriously money-savvy - in charge of Government.
Posted by R.W. | 06.10.08, 10:19 GMT
'The political judgement Mr Brown must make...'
Dear me, don't hold your breath! To date, there is no obvious evidence of any strategy or plan other than to mumble 'acting decisively....ready to do whatever it takes''. Oh, yes, sorry, I forgot there's now a new committee composed mainly of the usual clueless suspects and current issues will be reviewed.
When Brown does exercise his 'judgment', what do we get? The 10p tax fiasco and announcements of Internet connection vouchers aimed at poorer families; presumably the same the ones unable to afford their electricity bills!
Posted by m collins | 06.10.08, 09:16 GMT
Here's my guesses for the week ahead: Savings rate tarts will start trying to get out of Kaupthing Edge (and Indian and Nigerian banks too). Systems for internet savers will gum up.
The bank of England will put official interest rates down a notch, but every bank in Britain will start advertising new juicy rates for depositors (avoid for now), while mortgage rates and business loan rates continue inexorably upwards.
Plenty of small businesses are going to look at the new 50% rise in their borrowing costs, and start laying off staff to try to survive. The unemployment tsunami will have hit the beach.
Oblivious to all this, the last idiot in England, after watching a video of Kirsty, will rush out and buy the only house to sell in England this October.
Gordon will do what was necessary to do last week. It is too late now but he will do it anyway. The effect will be nil.
Stock market volatility will be unparalleled. The trend, down.
Interesting times are here.
Posted by tony peterson | 06.10.08, 07:28 GMT
Gordon Brown's indecisive nature always leads to him to act when it is too late. He is the Hamlet of Downing Street.
It was Vince Cable who identified the correct course of action over Northern Rock. The government wouldn't listen to him. Eventually they were forced by events to do exactly what he had suggested six months earlier.
Now the meeting on Saturday of a handful of European leaders in Paris has been exposed for what it was - a complete waste of time and money. We don't yet understand exactly what the Germans have decided to do about guaranteeing bank savings but they are not as vague as the British government's mantra that they will do "whatever it takes" to protect savings.
Until "whatever it takes" is translated into concrete actions British savers will take the prudent and predictable course of distrusting vague political waffle and take matters into their own hands. Trust a politician with your money - are you insane?
Posted by Miles | 06.10.08, 06:28 GMT