Jeremy Warner's Outlook: Oil pushes world towards recession
Friday, 13 June 2008
Yesterday's discussion document from the Treasury – Global commodities: a long-term vision for stable, secure and sustainable global markets – is long on analysis of the inflated oil price but almost entirely bereft of meaningful solutions. To be fair, this is largely because there are none, or at least none which are within the Treasury's gift.
It has long seemed to me that the only thing likely to bring the oil price back to earth is a global recession, and that is exactly what very high oil prices seem destined to bring about.
High oil prices are one of the main causes of today's elevated rates of inflation. Central bankers feel obliged to treat these pressures with higher interest rates, which perhaps sooner rather than later will poleaxe growth in the developed and developing world alike.
The only reason the inevitability of this outcome is not already reflected in lower energy prices is because the balance of supply and demand remains so tight. Heightened demand will persist until it loses its capacity to pay, and, too late, the oil price will then fall. Tony Hayward, chief executive of BP, dismisses the idea that speculative activity has contributed to the rocketing oil price as a myth.
I suspect he is wrong about this, for it seems to me manifest that oil purchases by investors with no ultimate use for the stuff other than to sell it on at a profit are an important contributor to today's elevated levels of overall demand.
Yet this doesn't necessarily mean that the price is a false one. Whether the causes are speculative or not, the high oil price sends out a number of important signals. The main one is that demand needs to fall and supply to increase. The main levers of supply continue to lie with politically unstable or unpalatable regimes in the Middle East, Russia and South America. As Mr Hayward observes, the chief constraints on supply are political, rather than geological.
International oil companies, such as BP, with access to the capital and expertise to pursue development have found themselves shut out of the major producing areas of the world, some of which are deliberately holding back reserves in the almost certainly mistaken belief that they provide a store of value for future generations. In fact, the rationing of supply only creates incentives to find alternative energy sources.
We cannot do much either about the subsidies that in many areas of the world inhibit the stabilisation that would occur in consumption if the pricing mechanism were allowed to work as it should.
Nor is demand entirely within our control. In the developed West, we can make ourselves more efficient, or develop alternatives to hydrocarbons. But we can do nothing to stop the structural increase in demand coming out of development in Asia. As I say, the end game looks ever more likely to be global recession. In those circumstances, producer nations, the apparent beneficiaries of sky-high oil prices, will suffer alongside consumer countries.

the view that speculators are the cause of the oil price surge is utter rubish recycled by head in the oil sands half wits in whitehall washington.and the city.this is a loincloth to cover their exposed lacking in energy policy groins,
oil is the worlds largest traded commodity a few billion speculative extra printed paper dollars here and there have no reasonable effect probably as much effect as the boe has on mortgage rates .drive your car on any motorway on a monday morning at eight and marvel at our unsustainable oil powered party of jams moving car parks etc..enjoy the party dawn approaches.welcome to the nowties. roll the printing presses what price oil do you want.200,300 ,400 dollars.
Posted by paperpowered future | 14.06.08, 01:09 GMT
It is not high oil prices that are causing inflation, but massive growth in the money supply caused by artificially low interest rates, which are devaluing all the major currencies. It is not the price of oil that will cause recession, it is the shortage of oil. The supply cannot keep up with demand, and we are being outbid for the supply by a dollar rich Chindia. We will burn less oil, because there is less to go around. Oil is irreplaceable in our society, and the less we burn, the more our economy contracts. Tighten your belts!
Posted by Ralph W | 13.06.08, 14:29 GMT
Your viewpoint that some countries are deliberately witholding output suffers from the disadvantage that there is no evidence at all of this.
Sure, Saudi always says that it could increase output if it wanted too, but it's actual behaviour tracks very well with a country which could only increase output a lot in the very short term, and whose oil assets are rapidly depleting.
Demand in oil exporting countries is also rising rapidly leaving less and less oil available for export.
Renewables or new nuclear cannot have much effect in less than 10 years so it seems likely that depression will last at least that long, with economies dependent on a scarce resource which is likely to remain at around the same production levels whilst demand rises.
Posted by David Marting | 13.06.08, 12:42 GMT
"In fact the rationing of supply only creates incentives to find alternative energy sources"............
True, but so what? The paradox arises because all alternative energy sources are expensive to exploit and are not economic unless the market price of their competitor( oil) is high. The owners of the raw oil therefore have an incentive to parse and restrict the availability of their resources so that the consuming economies pay the highest optimum price for their energy, oil included.
The consuming economies could upset this calculation by rationing the consumption of oil for personal transportation, the car. Most of the oil consumed by the USA is necessary for gasoline production . Unfortunately the Americans have dug a very deep hole and fallen into it because they have no viable alternative to the car for their social and economic functions
Posted by Brian Eastwood | 13.06.08, 02:59 GMT