Jeremy Warner's Outlook: Sir Ken pays heavy price for botched integration

All along, there's been a big question mark over whether Wm Morrison supermarkets would be up to the management challenge of integrating Safeway, and I regret to say that the sceptics have been proved substantially correct.

All along, there's been a big question mark over whether Wm Morrison supermarkets would be up to the management challenge of integrating Safeway, and I regret to say that the sceptics have been proved substantially correct.

Sir Ken Morrison, the chairman, was putting the best possible gloss on the calamitous setback he announced yesterday, heaping as much of the blame as he decently could on past mismanagement of Safeway, yet the reality is that Sir Ken is largely the author of his own misfortune.

Stubborn Yorkshireman that he is, Sir Ken refused to accept that there is anything other than the Morrison way of doing things, and since acquiring Safeway in March, he has moved with dispatch to impose Morrison prices, products and marketing techniques on Safeway with predictably devastating consequences for profits and like-for-like sales. Sir Ken insists that he had to do this because Safeway's footfall was falling off a cliff. To stop the rot, he was forced to move much more swiftly than he would have liked, sacrificing margin and sales along the way.

But actually this is not what happened. The original idea was that the two businesses would be run in parallel until Morrison was ready to execute a big bang approach to converting Safeway to its own format and distribution system. Had Sir Ken followed this plan, I suspect that profits, and probably sales too, could have been protected.

Yet as soon as he acquired Safeway, Sir Ken moved rapidly to dispense with virtually all the old guard at Safeway, including the two senior executives who were to have stayed for two to three years to oversee the transition. He then axed the company's midweek flyer campaign, which was about the only thing that was still keeping customers coming through the door, and unilaterally imposed Morrison's much lower prices across virtually all the Safeway product range. At the same time he confused the customer by introducing Morrison own label products into unconverted Safeway stores. Bizarrely he also gave up Safeway's practice of asking for upfront supplier income in favour of his own system of back end loaded rebates, at a cost to Safeway of approximately £180m.

As a text book study on how not to do an integration, they don't come any more revealing than this one. The good news is that once converted to the Morrison format, sales in Safeway stores tend to soar, which bodes well for the future. Yet in the short term, Sir Ken is paying a heavy price for his pig headedness. I've no doubt that eventually the merger can be made to work. The potential synergies and cost cuts are vast. Unfortunately, there's plenty of scope for further disappointments before things start to get better.

Legal & General

Good news. People are living longer. Yet if like Legal & General you happen to be big in the annuities business, increased longevity is not as much of a blessing as it seems, at least in the short term. Legal & General has for some years adopted a slightly less conservative view of how long people will live after retirement than many of its peers. Yesterday it moved finally to bring itself into line with the most recent data on increased longevity. To the relief of investors, the damage was comparatively limited - an increase of less than £100m in reserves and a reduction in embedded value of 3p a share. The stock market had feared much worse and the shares surged by more than 4 per cent.

Yet the really good news in yesterday's trading update is that new business volumes surged by more than a fifth in the second quarter. After four years of famine, things have at last begun to change for the better for the beleaguered long-term savings industry. David Prosser, L&G's chief executive, detects a real change of mood, with a definitive return of consumer confidence to equity-based products. To some extent L&G is benefiting from the discomfort of its peers, most notably Standard Life, whose reputation has been well and truly trashed by the botched manner in which the FSA imposed new solvency requirements on the Edinburgh life assurer.

But as one of the industry's most financially robust and efficient players, L&G is also drawing strength from some well defined demographic trends. Greater longevity means that buying an annuity costs more with the effect that most of us are going to have to save more. Ten years ago, a pension pot of £100,000 would have bought a £13,000 per annum annuity. Today it will buy little more than half that. To be certain of a decent pension people will have to save more and work longer. It is only very recently that they have begun to wake up and smell the coffee.

So even for L&G, once the present bout of indigestion in the annuities business is overcome, greater longevity is very much something to celebrate.

Unilever governance

As shell wrestles with corporate governance and structural reform, you might have thought that the oil giant's travails would have prompted some soul searching at that other great Anglo Dutch behemoth based just across the river Thames, Unilever. Not a bit of it. The Unilever board is perfectly happy with the present dual domiciled nature of the company, and has no intention of changing it, or indeed altering by one jot the way the board is structured, functions and appoints its members.

Unilever is a little bit different from Shell in that it already has a unified board. Unlike Shell, the two publicly quoted halves of Unilever - Unilever PLC (British based) and Unilever NV (Dutch based) - also have an equal interest in the group's combined assets. Nor is there any crisis in the company's affairs that would seem to demand change. Unilever has disappointed investors with sluggish sales growth, but the shares remain relatively close to their all-time high and there are few worries about the company's long-term future.

Nonetheless, there are some peculiarities which mark the company out from the conventions of modern corporate governance codes. One of these is that the role of chairman and chief executive is combined. What's more there are two of them - Niall Fitzgerald and Anthony Burgmans, the one answerable to the British half, the other to the Dutch domiciled company. While this might seem a very effective system of corporate governance control in that the two are able to oversee each other, it can't be good for swift and decisive action. Consultation and discussion must constantly get in the way, and there is obvious potential for messy compromise, fudge or ever total paralysis.

Yet in practice, the upside seems to outweigh the downside. Swift and decisive action in business can often lead to gigantic mistakes. The partnership structure of two equally powerful executive chairmen seems to work rather well. When he became one of those chairmen seven years ago, Niall Fitzgerald promised to change the company from a supertanker into a flotilla of fast-moving frigates, so as to make it better adapted to fast-changing consumer trends. Plenty of progress has been made, but of its nature Unilever is a not the place for revolutions.

That's the trouble with leviathans. Any change beyond the incremental and evolutionary risks killing off the beast altogether. Yet Unilever is a company that has stood the test of time. At 75 years of age, Unilever is one of the oldest companies in the Fortune 500, and I think it fair to say it is better placed today than ever. Even on diet, health and social responsibility, the big food issues of our time, Unilever has largely managed to position itself on the side of the angels, which for a global foods company is quite something. That's as much a tribute to the company's peculiar corporate governance structures as anything else. If it ain't broke, why fix it?

Suggested Topics
Start your day with The Independent, sign up for daily news emails
  • Get to the point
Latest stories from i100
Have you tried new the Independent Digital Edition apps?
Independent Dating
and  

By clicking 'Search' you
are agreeing to our
Terms of Use.

iJobs Job Widget
iJobs Money & Business

Recruitment Genius: Financial Adviser

£20000 - £60000 per annum: Recruitment Genius: Are you recently QCA Level 4 qu...

SThree: Graduate Recruitment Resourcer

£20000 - £22500 per annum + OTE £30K: SThree: SThree Group have been well esta...

Guru Careers: Application Support Analyst / 1st Line Support

£25 - 30k: Guru Careers: We are seeking an Application Support Analyst / 1st L...

Guru Careers: .NET Developer / Web Developer

£45K - £55K (DOE) + Benefits: Guru Careers: We are seeking a full stack .NET D...

Day In a Page

Not even the 'putrid throat' could stop the Ross Poldark swoon-fest'

Not even the 'putrid throat' could stop the Ross Poldark swoon-fest'

How a costume drama became a Sunday night staple
Miliband promises no stamp duty for first-time buyers as he pushes Tories on housing

Miliband promises no stamp duty for first-time buyers

Labour leader pushes Tories on housing
Aviation history is littered with grand failures - from the the Bristol Brabazon to Concorde - but what went wrong with the SuperJumbo?

Aviation history is littered with grand failures

But what went wrong with the SuperJumbo?
Fear of Putin, Islamists and immigration is giving rise to a new generation of Soviet-style 'iron curtains' right across Europe

Fortress Europe?

Fear of Putin, Islamists and immigration is giving rise to a new generation of 'iron curtains'
Never mind what you're wearing, it's what you're reclining on

Never mind what you're wearing

It's what you're reclining on that matters
General Election 2015: Chuka Umunna on the benefits of immigration, humility – and his leader Ed Miliband

Chuka Umunna: A virus of racism runs through Ukip

The shadow business secretary on the benefits of immigration, humility – and his leader Ed Miliband
Yemen crisis: This exotic war will soon become Europe's problem

Yemen's exotic war will soon affect Europe

Terrorism and boatloads of desperate migrants will be the outcome of the Saudi air campaign, says Patrick Cockburn
Marginal Streets project aims to document voters in the run-up to the General Election

Marginal Streets project documents voters

Independent photographers Joseph Fox and Orlando Gili are uploading two portraits of constituents to their website for each day of the campaign
Game of Thrones: Visit the real-life kingdom of Westeros to see where violent history ends and telly tourism begins

The real-life kingdom of Westeros

Is there something a little uncomfortable about Game of Thrones shooting in Northern Ireland?
How to survive a social-media mauling, by the tough women of Twitter

How to survive a Twitter mauling

Mary Beard, Caroline Criado-Perez, Louise Mensch, Bunny La Roche and Courtney Barrasford reveal how to trounce the trolls
Gallipoli centenary: At dawn, the young remember the young who perished in one of the First World War's bloodiest battles

At dawn, the young remember the young

A century ago, soldiers of the Empire – many no more than boys – spilt on to Gallipoli’s beaches. On this 100th Anzac Day, there are personal, poetic tributes to their sacrifice
Dissent is slowly building against the billions spent on presidential campaigns – even among politicians themselves

Follow the money as never before

Dissent is slowly building against the billions spent on presidential campaigns – even among politicians themselves, reports Rupert Cornwell
Samuel West interview: The actor and director on austerity, unionisation, and not mentioning his famous parents

Samuel West interview

The actor and director on austerity, unionisation, and not mentioning his famous parents
General Election 2015: Imagine if the leading political parties were fashion labels

Imagine if the leading political parties were fashion labels

Fashion editor, Alexander Fury, on what the leaders' appearances tell us about them
Phumzile Mlambo-Ngcuka: Home can be the unsafest place for women

Phumzile Mlambo-Ngcuka: Home can be the unsafest place for women

The architect of the HeForShe movement and head of UN Women on the world's failure to combat domestic violence