Business

Mostly Cloudy with Showers 7° London Hi 8°C / Lo 4°C

Karen Ward: Three reasons why the MPC members can sit back and enjoy their pina coladas

Monday, 18 August 2008

As the Bank of Englandinterest-rate setters prepare to embark on their summer hols, I wonder what books they'll be packing. With inflation ratcheting ever higher, some might be looking for complete escapism. A romantic novel perhaps? Others may reach for the history books – if only to reassure themselves that by the standards of the UK's troubled economic past, things really aren't so bad.

But those seeking deeper insights could do worse than heading straight for their local bookstore's popular science section. Buried among its shelves, they'll find a book that could hold a lesson or two for their current inflation predicament: MalcolmGladwell's The Tipping Point.

Published at the turn of the decade, as the dot.com boom was turning to bust, Gladwell's first bestsellerproposed three conditions required to reach a tipping point.

The first requirement he named the Law of the Few. The idea is that "the success of any kind of socialepidemic is heavily dependent on the involvement of people with a particular and rare set of social skills". This small cadre of influencers can play a key role in spreading ideas.

One example cited by Gladwell was the Hush Puppies brand. Struggling in late 1994, it took just a few New York fashionistas to bring it back from the brink. Others followed suit, and before long everyone was wearing them. Sales of Hush Puppiesexploded without a penny being spent on advertising.

Now, it's fairly hard to imagine those wise souls on the Bank of England's Monetary Policy Committee taking a turn on the catwalk when London Fashion Week kicks off next month. In the economic world, though, they are the trendsetters.As skilled practitioners, unsullied by political influence, these are people the public should be able to trust.

In the current economic climate, that credibility is crucial. Inflation may be high and set to rise further in the next few months. But in last week's Inflation Report, the Committee made clear that it views this as a temporary phenomenon. Inflation will be back to target before long, and that is the trend for price-setters and wage-bargainers to follow.

The second condition for a tipping point is what Gladwell calls the Rule of Stickiness. This is the idea that to achieve the desired change, a message has to be sufficiently compelling or memorable. Only then does amessage have much chance of beingassimilated and influencing behaviour.

The example cited in the book is the kids' TV programme Sesame Street. As its creators developed the concept, they found that the combination of people and puppets provided a memorable mix of reality and fantasy that helped kids to remember and understand what they had seen. It made their educational messages "sticky".

The MPC hasn't resorted to such gimmicks (although it would be great fun if it did) in its attempts to provide a compelling message. Its story is one of painful adjustment: too high global energy and food prices, credit market turmoil and over-valued property markets. Although a temporary bout of inflation is inevitable, inflation will return to target.

For a number of reasons, this is a more compelling message than those conveyed by other major central banks. The Federal Reserve, for example, may try to communicate that it will ensure the rise in US inflation is temporary. But it's saddled with a dual mandate, to ensure full employment as well as price stability. And it has acted far more quickly andaggressively than other central banks in cutting interest rates. Against this backdrop, is the Fed message really that "sticky"?

The European Central Bank, by contrast, has worked hard to deliver a compelling message about its inflation-beating credentials. It has even gone so far as to raise interest rates, at a time when growth in the region is grinding to a halt. But, despite its best efforts, the ECB is hamstrung by the inflexibility of the eurozone labour market.

****

This inflexibility is most apparent in the prevalence of wage indexation. In a throwback to the UK economy of the 1970s, many eurozone countries still index wage increases to inflation. For thosecountries, higher inflation will feed into wage inflation, as surely as night follows day. And that raises doubts about the ability of the ECB to ensure that any burst of inflation does prove shortlived.

Unlike the Fed and the ECB, the MPC is able to boast of both a clear mandate to return inflation to target and the labour flexibility to ensure this happens. So it's rather easier for the MPC to make a compelling case that the temporary burst in inflation we're seeing is just that – temporary.

The third and final condition for a tipping point is the Power of Context. This states that human behaviour is highly sensitive to its environment. Gladwell argues that sometimes even the smallest of changes to theenvironment can produce a major change overall.

One example is the well-known "broken window" approach totackling crime. Cleaning up theenvironment by removing graffiti, picking up litter and mending broken windows can have a major impact on the crime rate. It can make more difference than a policy of more police and more arrests.

Economic outcomes are no less sensitive to environment. When the economy is booming, workers are more likely to push for pay rises. And firms, believing that they may well be able to pass increased costs on to consumers, are more likely to accede.

In the current economic climate, the opposite is true. Squeezed by higher food and energy bills, consumers are hardly at their most extravagant right now. And, with unemployment rising, workers are feeling far less secure in their own jobs. This isn't particularly fertile ground for any retailers bent on raising prices or workers anxious for higher pay.

As our bookworms on the MPCfinish their holiday read, they may therefore feel some comfort.Although inflation is set to risefurther over the next month or two, it will be falling sharply before too long, and the Committee will finally be able to provide the interest rate cuts the economy so badly needs. The tipping point is in reach. Time for another pina colada, I think.

Karen Ward is UK economist at HSBC.

Interesting? Click here to explore further

Karen, you're a typical member of the economists' 'community'. You, basically, along with your other economist geek pals - including the members of the MPC, haven't a clue. Unless you have a time machine you have no idea what the future holds and judging by past performance your economic models aren't really working, are they - as neither are the the members of the MPC. King and his buddies are clueless and haven't been correct in their inflation analysis so far and yet you want us to believe their projections for the future - yeah, right. However, I'm sure you're correct about a couple of things: the MPC must be feeling very comfortable -pulling nice salaries for incompetence and failure [how many people do you know who keep their jobs when their target is missed by at least 100%?] and, yes, they may as well be sitting somewhere far away drinking pina coladas for all the good they are doing.

Posted by David Cooper | 18.08.08, 16:33 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

The MPC do not deserve a holiday except at Guantanamo and Karen this is a pathetically poor article but then what else should we expect from someone claiming to be an economist. If you can't see that the mess we are in is due to years of artificially low interest rates designed to create a housing bubble to keep the economic illusion going then I would say Karen your credentials as an economist are not worth the paper they are written on. And now you want more interest rate cuts! In the face of 1.45 trilllion UK personal debt and savings at their lowest levels for 50 years you want to devalue Sterling cause more inflation and give people not incentive to save. Are you some kind of moron?

Posted by Chris | 18.08.08, 10:55 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

This utter rubbish from an 'economist' at HSBC - no wonder......
Life is too short to actually respond to this junk from a woman who obviously has her head in a very dark place.

Posted by Victor M. | 18.08.08, 09:32 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

You have neglected to mention the Public Sector. They will push for inflation- proof rises. What will the MPC do? - insist that it is nothing to do with them.
The MPC, through their lack of oversight on easy credit and the toxic paper UK based banks were generating, buying and selling are one of the parties responsible for basket-case Britain.

Posted by Tim Black | 18.08.08, 09:02 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

A securitized sub prime loan in the US leads to repossessions in the UK and, worse, starving children in Africa. Will the present crisis be a wake up call for Governments and central banks to finally regulate the financial markets whose greed and speculation have brought the world's economies and many of its people to the brink of disaster.

Posted by peter fieldman | 18.08.08, 08:42 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

A securitized sub prime loan in the US leads to repossessions in the UK and, worse, starving children in Africa. Will the present crisis be a wake up call for Governments and central banks to regulate the financial markets whose greed and speculation have brought the world's economies and many of its people to the brink of disaster.

Posted by peter fieldman | 18.08.08, 08:41 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details

So Karen

I am left to assume that this is your personal view rather than an analysis of Mr Gladwell's theory?

On the first of G's conditions which is the "trendsetter?" issue, should we not turn the clock back to 2003ish when the head of the treasury warned the country against the dangers of lending excesses and the property market, which although exhaulted as advice (by US commentators particularly) at the time. seemed quickly lost in the land grab inflation of the following 5 years. This to me also squirts solvent on his stickiness theory- from when in time do you start measuring stckiness? Obviously that warning and subsequent efforts have not stuck.

Sure things now look desperate enough to scare the pants off índiviiduals, investors and UK Plc but I for one would suggest that realists shove your man's children's puppets, graffiti cleaning crime statistics and consumer's shopping lists into a Gladstone bag and throw them into the Thames before throwing him in too.

Posted by grahame | 18.08.08, 05:25 GMT

Post a complaint

Please note all fields are required.

Contact details