Maybe $10bn fine for BNP is not so unreasonable
Outlook Sacrebleu! The Americans’ reported plan to fine BNP Paribas $10bn for alleged sanctions-busting has sparked quite the transatlantic tiff.
French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius is fuming over the size of the penalty, which he has described as “unreasonable”.
But is it? BNP isn’t the first European bank to be accused of doing business with various regimes the US does not like and has imposed sanctions upon.
HSBC was also caught out and paid out $1.9bn in 2012 to settle similar, but apparently less serious, charges.
Let’s leave aside the issues at stake for a moment and look purely at the figures.
HSBC’s fine looks to be very substantial. But when compared to the bank’s earnings in the year in which it was levied the impact was actually rather limited.
In 2012, the bank turned in underlying profits of $16.4bn on revenues of $63.5bn. It also paid out $8.3bn in dividends, up 10 per cent, and handed its chief executive Stuart Gulliver a package worth £7.4m. He wasn’t the best paid banker there either. Clearly no one at HSBC was going hungry.
The penalty was still painful, not least because of the public relations hit. But the money amounted to about six weeks’ earnings.
Even though fines on banks have recently undergone a step change in terms of their size, most of them are still having only a modest impact on earnings.
Institutional investors have tended to regard fines as one-offs or simply part of the general cost of doing business. They might huff and puff a bit every now and again for form’s sake, but as long as the dividend cheques keep flowing then they haven’t worried overly much.
It begs the question: are these fines really effective? Do they really matter?
Which brings us back to BNP because $10bn really does matter. It’s more than BNP made in profit last year, and more than it probably will make this year. Accompanied, perhaps, with a possible temporary ban on moving money in and out of the US, such a penalty will have a real and demonstrable impact on the business and on BNP’s share price, which has already taken quite the tumble. What’s more, it will get the attention of other banks.
So perhaps it’s not so unreasonable after all. What might be is the fact that these mega-fines do seem to be concentrated solely on European banks, which are already faced with investment banking regulations their US rivals don’t have to worry about if they want to operate in the land of the free. That’s the point for Mr Fabius to focus on.
- 1 This is what the one in ten British men who pay for sex need to know
- 2 Lee Evans announces retirement from comedy on The Jonathan Ross Show
- 3 These grandmas smoking weed for the first time are wonderful
- 4 Woman opens professional cuddling shop – gets 10,000 customers in first week
'Muslims pre-date Columbus in discovering America,' says Turkish president Erdogan
Former Tory PM Sir John Major says 'we would not have an NHS without migrants'
France 'blocks' Russian sailors from boarding a warship
G20 summit: David Cameron warns Vladimir Putin that Russia's relationship with the West is at a 'fork in the road' over Ukraine
Myleene Klass: Ed Miliband 'strikes back' by comparing UK's need for Labour's mansion tax to Hear'Say track
Coalition government has 'shifted money from poorest to better-off' through welfare cuts and tax reductions, study claims
iJobs Money & Business
£20000 - £25000 per annum + OTE £35,000: SThree: We consistently strive to be ...
£50000 - £90000 per annum + benefits: Ampersand Consulting LLP: Markit EDM (CA...
$175 - $200 per annum, Benefits: full benefits: Carlton Senior Appointments: P...
Not specified: Carlton Senior Appointments: Senior MD Financial Advisor - San ...