OUTLOOK: Bankers still having their cake and eating it
“It is the decision of the board and myself that this entirely is the right decision for the group and in the long-term interests of shareholders.”
We’ve seen this sort of statement deployed by executives on countless occasions to justify countless decisions that turn out to be anything but in the interests of shareholders, long term, short term or any term you care to mention.
Barclays Antony Jenkins was using it to justify the decision to pay bigger bonuses to his investment bankers despite the profits they generate having fallen.
Mr Jenkins claimed that Barclays needs to hire the “best people” from San Francisco to Singapore. To do that, he argued, it had to pay up, heedless of the fact that those profits took a dip.
is it worth mentioning here that one of the arguments against the EU’s banking bonus cap is that it destroys banks’ ability to adjust variable pay (or bonuses) down when times are tough or when banks aren’t performing?
If bonuses aren’t going to be adjusted downwards when things haven’t gone all that well the Government may just as well drop its lawsuit against the cap and save the taxpayer some legal fees.
What should worry those with an interest in Barclays’ future is just how similar his statement was to the sort of things his predecessor Bob Diamond used to say before the Libor scandal cost him his job.
The question neither appeared prepared to ask is whether the investment banking business is worth shareholders’ while in the first place given the escalating costs and risks.
It seems that in banks, at least those heavily involved in investment banking, there are two classes of shareholder.
There are the pension funds, small investors and other institutions that put up capital for banks to carry out their business and which are diluted when bonus time comes around and vast swathes of free shares are doled out.
And there are the bankers who receive those free shares as part of their bonuses, and then cash them as soon as they are able to “diversify”.
The discrepancy between the two can be demonstrated by the fact that Barclays paid three times the amount in bonuses to what it paid to its shareholders in dividends. Now you know whose “long term interests” come first.
- 1 Disney heiress Abigail disowns her share of family profits in West Bank company
- 2 The secret report that helps Israel hide facts
- 3 'Women should not laugh in public,' says Turkey's Deputy Prime Minister in morality speech
- 4 Ebola virus: UK health officials issue warning to doctors as experts admit the outbreak 'is not under control'
- 5 Ross Burden dead: MasterChef and Ready Steady Cook star dies at age 45 after suffering from cancer
'Women should not laugh in public,' says Turkey's Deputy Prime Minister in morality speech
Richard Dawkins says 'date rape is bad, stranger rape is worse' on Twitter
Ross Burden dead: MasterChef and Ready Steady Cook star dies at age 45 after suffering from cancer
Zayn Malik on Israel-Gaza: One Direction singer bombarded with Twitter death threats after posting #FreePalestine
MH17 crash: Black boxes show plane suffered 'massive explosive decompression' following shrapnel hit
The secret report that helps Israel hide facts
A day in the life of Vladimir Putin: The dictator in his labyrinth
Woman and two children killed by mob in riots over 'blasphemous' Facebook post in Pakistan
Putin is 'thuggish, dishonest and reckless', says British ambassador to US
Boozy, ignorant, intolerant, but very polite – Britain as others see us
A new Russian revolution: The cracks are starting to appear in Putin’s Kremlin power bloc
- < Previous
- Next >
iJobs Money & Business
£350 - £400 per annum + competitive: Orgtel: Project Manager (specializing in ...
£25000 per annum + OTE £40,000: SThree: Orgtel are seeking Graduate Trainee Re...
£45000 per annum + Benefits: Ashdown Group: ** HR Business Partner - Senior H...
£28000 - £32000 per annum + Benefits: Ashdown Group: PA / Team Secretary - Mat...