OUTLOOK: The Faustian pact behind Royal Mail's cheap sell-off
Outlook While MPs might not be much loved, there aren't many who won't cheer them on when they're monstering bankers.
But while the Business, Innovation & Skills committee was fun to watch, to no great surprise the bankers stuck to their guns and their story when it comes to the valuation put on Royal Mail's shares ahead of its privatisation.
Their contention was that City institutions would have baulked were the price raised much above the top of range 330p (the shares have since shot above 500p) at which Royal Mail plc eventually debuted.
Which misses the point. If the institutions weren't going to play, the public probably would have. So oversubscribed was their part of the flotation that no one (myself included) got more than a minimum allocation. Would I have bought at, say, 360p? Very probably. That price, remember, is at the lower end of a valuation range suggested by Gert Zonneveld, the co-head of equity research at Panmure Gordon.
But even Mr Zonneveld's range looks conservative now. That's wonderful for those of us who invested and stayed put. But not so good for the taxpayer, who has been left out of pocket.
I'm not about to argue that the shares shouldn't have been priced to go. That's what happens with big sell-offs. But there is a world of difference between priced to go and sold off on the cheap.
The performance of Royal Mail since the sell-off demonstrates that its privatisation belongs in the latter category. Of course, you won't find the banks that advised on the flotation admitting that. And you won't find Mr Cable admitting that either.
He had the chance to hike the price. But there's probably a good reason for him not doing so. He, and the Government he represents, appear to have signed a Faustian pact with the City.
It amounts to this: ministers will do what they are told in return for the City finding a home for the billions of pounds' worth of banking shares the state would desperately like to get off its books. Of course, they'll never admit that. And so we'll probably be here again when the next state asset is sold off on the cheap.
Justin Bieber was one of the hardest hit
- 1 Nigel Farage: Me vs Russell Brand on Question Time – he's got the chest hair but where are his ideas?
- 2 Harry Potter fans can apply to the Hogwarts-inspired College of Wizardry
- 3 Jessica Chambers: 19-year-old woman 'doused with lighter fluid and burned alive' in the US
- 4 Russell Brand calls Nigel Farage 'poundshop Enoch Powell' in BBC Question Time debate
- 5 Orange Wednesdays are no more
Weather bomb in pictures: Storms cuts power for tens of thousands – and snow is on the way
Jessica Chambers: 19-year-old woman 'doused with lighter fluid and burned alive' in the US
Russell Brand calls Nigel Farage 'poundshop Enoch Powell' in BBC Question Time debate
Russell Brand was rendered speechless on Question Time by this man
Fury at Airbus after it hints the super-jumbo may be mothballed
Disgruntled RBS worker writes hilarious open letter to Russell Brand after anti-capitalist publicity stunt leaves him hungry
Shock poll shows voters believe Ukip is to the left of the Tories
Nigel Farage's approval rating hits 'record low' as popularity suffers in wake of Ukip sex scandal
Nigel Farage defends Kerry Smith 'ch***y' comment: 'If you are going for a Chinese, what do you say you’re going for?'
Ukip candidate jokes about 'shooting peasants' in racist and homophobic rant
Pakistan school attack live: Taliban kill at least 132 children in 'horrifying' massacre
iJobs Money & Business
Up to £70,000 per annum + benefits: Sheridan Maine: Are you a qualified accoun...
Up to £65,000 per annum + benefits: Sheridan Maine: Are you a qualified accoun...
£32000 - £35000 per annum + benefits: Ashdown Group: Marketing Services Manage...
£Neg. (DOE) + Excellent Benefits: Guru Careers: A Finance Account Manager with...