Stephen Foley: How to respond to AOL and Yahoo deal talk
Saturday 16 October 2010
US Outlook: There is only one proper response to the idea that Yahoo! could be target of a buyout by private equity, and that is: LOL.
I'm loath to say it definitely will not happen. There are plenty of precedents for buying and levering up companies in structural decline, but they are not happy ones. Guy Hands of Terra Firma is due in court here on Monday, litigating the mess that is his takeover of EMI. And we are still getting jaw-dropping exposés of management incompetence at Sam Zell's Tribune newspaper group, two years after it landed in bankruptcy.
But I haven't found anyone yet who thinks the numbers could possibly be fudged sufficiently to justify a private-equity funded reverse takeover of Yahoo! by AOL, an idea which has been swirling round Silicon Valley this week.
With a market cap of around $22bn (£14bn), Yahoo is many times the size of AOL, which is worth $2.7bn, but what they have in common is the same deluded idea that they can be major content companies on the internet.
Web audiences are fragmenting between must-read specialist sites and mobile apps, or disappearing into social networks – so the AOL or Yahoo! menu of recycled news and uninspired features is not a guaranteed cash cow, especially now online advertisers are finding many new options.
What about turning the tables and making AOL the target? Yahoo! at least has a lucrative display ad network, which might be enhanced if it were to swallow AOL, using its newly inflated shares as currency and taking the opportunity of a merger to do the necessary cost-slashing across both companies. Even that, though, seems like an unappealing distraction from the real business of finding a new raison d'être for both companies, something which clearly eludes Carol Bartz, chief executive of Yahoo!, and now one assumes also eludes Tim Armstrong at AOL, if the rumours of his keenness to merge are true.
The one thing that could be said for going private is that Yahoo! would be able to take a more radical approach to reshaping its business than is possible in the limelight of the stock market. I'm afraid, though, the whole thing might be just another dream.
- 1 Rihanna 'nude pictures' claims emerge on 4Chan as hacking scandal continues
- 2 Kim Kardashian 'nude photos' leaked on 4chan weeks after Jennifer Lawrence scandal
- 3 'F*ck it, I quit': KTVA reporter Charlo Greene quits live on air in spectacular fashion
- 4 Free U2 album: How the most generous giveaway in music history turned PR disaster
- 5 Scotland could still declare independence – even without referendum, says Alex Salmond
Rihanna 'nude pictures' claims emerge on 4Chan as hacking scandal continues
Tesco in crisis: UK managing director among four executives suspended after exposure of accounting scandal
Kim Kardashian 'nude photos' leaked on 4chan weeks after Jennifer Lawrence scandal
'F*ck it, I quit': KTVA reporter Charlo Greene quits live on air in spectacular fashion
Alicia Keys leaks own nude photo 'to create a kinder and more peaceful world'
Scotland could still declare independence – even without referendum, says Alex Salmond
Scottish referendum results: Cross-party consensus collapses amid Tory-Labour spat on the 'English question'
Hilary Mantel 'should be investigated by police' over Margaret Thatcher assassination story, says Lord Bell
Scottish independence: David Cameron is becoming the 'George Bush of Britain'
Plebgate MP Andrew Mitchell called officer a 'little s**t', claim court documents 'exposing ex-Chief Whip's 'record of abusing police'
Archbishop of Canterbury admits doubts about existence of God
iJobs Money & Business
£65000 Per Annum Benefits + bonus: Clearwater People Solutions Ltd: If you are...
£20000 - £25000 per annum + OTE £40,000: SThree: SThree are a global FTSE 250 ...
£20000 - £25000 per annum + OTE £40000: SThree: As a Recruitment Consultant, y...
£20000 - £25000 per annum + OTE £40,000: SThree: SThree Group have been well e...