Don't call us `assets'
Sunday 12 September 1999
Or rather the conference was concerned with managing all this knowledge. And there lies the problem. This emphasis - inevitable, given the obsession of business with measurement and process - has led to the concept of intellectual capital and hence to the almost de rigueur chief executive's insistence that "our employees are our greatest asset".
Forget for a moment that many companies pay little more than lip service to the idea. What this is all about is conjuring up some kind of explanation for the fact that Microsoft and all those other hi-tech stocks have such huge market capitalisations and so little in the way of traditional assets.
Just as accountants invented "goodwill" as a catch all to explain why companies seeking to acquire businesses laden with brands had to pay so much more than the plant and machinery were worth, so management consultants have developed "intellectual capital" as a method of understanding the value of all that knowledge, expertise and intellectual property.
But as Thomas Davenport, a consultant himself, points out in a book published last week, this argument goes only so far. He says employees can't be assets as assets depreciate in value and people should become more valuable as they become more experienced. He suggests that we should see employees as investors. The idea put forward in Human Capital (Jossey-Bass) is that organisations should not seek to own or control employees - as the term asset implies. Instead, they should see them as free agents who invest their abilities, energy, behaviour and time in companies that give them the best return.
It is a powerful notion, and Mr Davenport claims to have seen it beginning to be put in place in a few organisations. But one can't help feeling that just as senior executives never truly adopted the idea of people as assets rather than costs, they're not readily going to see them as investors. Doing so would require a fundamental rethinking of the realities of business and, in particular, a full abandonment of the command and control attitudes that linger on, despite protestations to the contrary.
The challenge is particularly tough for human resource departments - not least as human beings can hardly be regarded as resources.
More seriously, though, the only way that such a move towards "deals" between employers and these free agents can possibly come about is if the HR departments devolve many of their traditional functions to line managers. The problem then is for the HR specialists to find something meaningful to do.
- 1 Stolen Instagram photo sells for $90,000
- 2 Before you complain about your GP, this is what you need to know about actually doing the job
- 3 UK's biggest male rape charity Survivors UK has state funding slashed to zero despite 120% rise in men reporting sexual violence and seeking help
- 4 'Don't blame all men for rape' campaign backfires spectacularly
- 5 Charlie Charlie Challenge explained: not a Mexican demon being summoned — it's gravity
UK's biggest male rape charity Survivors UK has state funding slashed to zero despite 120% rise in men reporting sexual violence and seeking help
Priest warns pupils the 'Charlie Charlie Challenge' is 'demonic activity'
'Don't blame all men for rape' campaign backfires spectacularly
Iran launches anti-Isis cartoon competition 'to expose true nature of Islamic State'
Fifa corruption arrests: Sepp Blatter 'quite relaxed' and confident he is 'not involved'
EU referendum: David Cameron's rules are a 'democratic disgrace', says French-born Scottish politician set to be denied a vote
The day that Britain resigned as a global power
SNP fury as HS2 finds 'no business case' for taking fast train service to Scotland
Australian man punched in the face for defending Muslim women from abuse on train
A nation of inequality: How the UK is failing to feed its most vulnerable people
David Starkey 'tells Amal Clooney to shut up and stop over-promoting human rights'
iJobs Money & Business
£30 - 35k: Guru Careers: We are seeking a Pricing Analyst to join a leading e-...
£20000 - £25000 per annum + OTE £45K YR1: SThree: At SThree, we like to be dif...
£20000 - £25000 per annum + competitive: SThree: Did you know? SThree is a mul...
£55 - 65k (DOE): Guru Careers: A unique opportunity for a permanent C# Develop...