Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

LU contract worth pounds 82m in jeopardy as firm fails

John Willcock,Financial Correspondent
Thursday 16 December 1993 00:02 GMT
Comments

LONDON Underground is working with the receivers of a Doncaster-based locomotive builder that collapsed yesterday to save pounds 82m worth of contracts LU recently placed with the company.

RFS Industries, which builds and refurbishes railway wagons and underground trains, had won a pounds 76m contract from London Underground for the refurbishment of Piccadilly Line trains and a pounds 6m contract for locomotives for the Jubilee Line.

Richard Rees and Gordon Horsfield of Price Waterhouse were appointed as receivers by Barclays Bank yesterday. More than 700 jobs are at risk. Mr Rees said management had failed to find a new business partner or investor.

Mr Rees said: 'RFS was a management buyout from British Rail in 1987. It was under-capitalised from the start. It did not have the ability to borrow enough to cover the level of business it was doing.

'We have had a good meeting with London Underground and they want to support an LU supplier on this site.'

Mr Rees said jobs were at risk and that management was already planning 200 redundancies in early 1994 as a result of a reduction in business levels.

RFS Industries was formed by a management buy-out from the former Doncaster Wagonworks division of British Rail. It diversified from wagon-building into overhauling underground trains, and provided the recently-refurbished trains on the Circle Line. Last year RFS had a turnover of pounds 45m.

London Underground said: 'We did not expect this to happen and are talking to the company about it. There's an awareness of problems for all train builders at the moment. Unfortunately in the last few years there hasn't been much of a market (for their products).'

Mr Rees said he would be approaching parties previously interested in taking over RFS but who had been discouraged by its extensive liabilities.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in