Lucas under fire in US over Gulf war equipment
Tuesday 18 January 1994
The company said it had been co- operating with the US authorities for 18 months in an investigation into components supplied by Lucas AUL, a New York division bought in two parts in 1986 and 1989. Lucas said appropriate provisions had been made, thought to be about pounds 12m to pounds 14m. But neither inquiry is finished and the company admitted that the final cost could be more - or less - than it had set aside.
A report in the Wall Street Journal claimed that US prosecutors were seeking at least dollars 20m ( pounds 13m). Far more importantly, it could hinder the company's chances of future Pentagon business at a time when Lucas is emerging from recession and about to embark on a new era under its chief executive-elect, George Simpson.
An out-of-court settlement seems likely, and a Lucas spokesman hoped the incident would not hit future business because the company had responded quickly to the allegations. Problems at AUL occurred before it was bought, and testing procedures improved, he said. Lucas embarked on a damage-limitation exercise yesterday to calm analysts and found that its share ended the day 3p up at 211p.
The more serious inquiry concerns Lucas AUL's quality control in the making of launch equipment for Maverick aircraft missles. US authorities began investigating the Maverick after a missile mistakenly killed US marines in Gulf War 'friendly fire'. Lucas said the Pentagon had confirmed that its equipment was in no way responsible.
Britain's top vet sparks controversy with call for ban on slashing animals' throats in 'ritual' slaughters for halal and kosher meat products
Ukraine crisis: Russia dismisses '3am ultimatum' as 'total nonsense'
If you're horrified by a flame-roasted dog, you should be shocked at a hog roast
Poor 'live like animals' says Boris's privately educated sister after going on 'poverty safari'
White people become less racist just by moving to more diverse areas, study finds
Exclusive: Impact of immigrants on British workers ‘negligible’
- 1 To those who can’t see the point of International Women’s Day: you are the very reason it exists
- 2 International Women's Day 2014: The shocking statistics that show why it is still so important
- 3 Saudi preacher who 'raped and tortured' his five -year-old daughter to death is released after paying 'blood money'
- 4 Orgasm machine to deliver climax at the push of a button
- 5 Liam Neeson turned down James Bond role because late wife Natasha Richardson said she wouldn't marry him if he took it
iJobs Money & Business
£12000 per annum: Inspiring Interns: The company works with Tier 1 FTSE 100 Ba...
£32000 - £36000 per annum + generous benefits: Pro-Recruitment Group: * TAX * ...
£37000 - £40000 per annum + £20000 benefits package: Pro-Recruitment Group: **...
£30000 - £35000 per annum + generous benefits: Pro-Recruitment Group: Mixed Ta...