Manifestos promise much but tell you nothing
Thursday 03 April 1997
Furthermore, the manifesto as it stands offers few clues as to the effect of all those tax and spend commitments on the public finances. Whether the cost of the new transferable allowance is pounds 1.2bn (Conservative) or pounds 5bn (Labour), it matters not a jot to the overall shape of the public finances if offset by a corresponding tax rise elsewhere. And whether the 20p basic tax rate is an "aspiration" or a "commitment", its pounds 6bn cost could easily be absorbed simply by leaving allowances unchanged for a while. Clever things, manifestos. They promise much, but they tell you nothing about how the books are going to be balanced to pay for it all.
It will be Labour's turn today and the story is likely to be a similar one, only in rather more alarming form. There will be lots of commitments, Central Office will wildly exaggerate their likely cost, and the manifesto will say nothing about how they are to be paid for. The truth of the matter is that both parties - Conservative and Labour - are going to find it exceptionally hard to stick within present spending commitments, and that's without any of the new pledges contained in yesterday's Tory manifesto and the likely promises made in today's Labour manifesto.
Indeed public spending plans as laid down in last November's Red Book are already unrealistically tight. Despite the fact that both parties are committed to real increased spending on health, the Red Book envisages no real growth in each of the next two financial years in spending on the National Health Service. In reality, spending on the NHS will continue to rise in real terms, whatever the Government does to cap it. That extra spending is going to have to be paid for with deeper cuts elsewhere. Add in the new commitments now being entered into and if either party were as good as their word, then they would have to kiss goodbye to what remains of the road-building programme and a lot more besides.
Alternatively they could allow borrowing to rise above Maastricht limits or just raise taxes. Labour or Conservative, the latter is all too likely to be the option chosen.
As Voltaire once said, “Ice cream is exquisite. What a pity it isn’t illegal”
- 1 Mother fed her daughter tapeworms to make her skinny for beauty pageant
- 2 Crystal Palace next manager latest: Palace consider Ally McCoist - EXCLUSIVE
- 3 Richard Dawkins on babies with Down Syndrome: 'Abort it and try again – it would be immoral to bring it into the world'
- 4 ALS ice bucket challenge co-founder Corey Griffin drowns, aged 27
- 5 Tim Sherwood column: 'It started as a three-horse race but turned into the Grand National'
'Alien thigh bone' on Mars: Excitement from alien hunters at 'evidence' of extraterrestrial life
West poised to join forces with Assad in face of Islamic State
Pamela Anderson rejects ice bucket challenge because of ALS experiments on animals: 'Mice had holes drilled into their skulls'
James Foley 'beheaded': Isis video shows militant with British accent 'execute US journalist' – as hunt begins for killer
ALS ice bucket challenge co-founder Corey Griffin drowns, aged 27
Richard Dawkins on babies with Down Syndrome: 'Abort it and try again – it would be immoral to bring it into the world'
Scottish independence: English people overwhelmingly want Scotland to stay in the UK
Isis threat: Cameron wants an alliance with Iran
Michael Brown shooting: Chaos erupts on the streets of Ferguson after autopsy shows teenager was shot six times – twice in the head
Bin bag full of cats' heads discovered near Manchester's Curry Mile
Disgusting, frustrating, but intriguing: how the country really feels about its politicians
iJobs Money & Business
£50000 - £60000 per annum: Harrington Starr: Network Engineer - CCNP, Hedge Fu...
£60000 - £70000 per annum: Harrington Starr: Senior Network Engineer-CCIE, Mul...
£30000 - £50000 per annum: Harrington Starr: Network Infrastructure Engineer (...
£35000 - £45000 per annum: Harrington Starr: Network Engineer (CCNP, BGP, Mult...