Money: Pleasure and pain
Financial observers took some very different positions on the reform plans for savings
Sunday 07 December 1997
Mark Boleat, director general of the Association of British Insurers, said the inclusion of life assurance policies is a very welcome development. "Life insurance is the most popular form of planned long-term saving in the UK."
Gary Marsh, head of Group Corporate Affairs at the Halifax, welcomed the simplicity, flexibility, accessibility and fairness of the proposals. "The proposed limits for contributions may be lower than currently available for PEPs but still offer significant incentives to most people to save, in keeping with the stated intention to benefit the many and not just the few."
Ernest Fenton, director general of the Association of Investment Trust Companies, welcomed the inclusion of many investment trusts previously excluded from PEPs because they invest mainly outside the EU.
Gary Britton, savings and investment manager at the Pearl, was one of the few established providers of tax-free savings to welcome the proposals. He described the pounds 50,000 lifetime limit as "realistic".
Most established providers were highly critical. Philip Warland, director general of the Association of Unit Trusts, said: "The majority of PEP investors are not rich. Their reasonable expectations would be betrayed and there is a real danger that as the proposals currently stand the ISA will simply not succeed in getting off the ground."
Paul Kafka, executive director of Fidelity Investments, one of the main PEP managers, said: "There are some good elements but the whole package is ruined by the pounds 50,000 lifetime limit on contributions.
"It will act as a disincentive to new savers by creating a manana mentality among savers who will think they will have plenty of time to reach the limit later, but it punishes those who are already over the limit. Monitoring the limit will result in more cost to the Government and create a big brother approach."
Elspeth May, personal financial services partner at KPMG, said: "The new accounts appear to be significantly less attractive than the PEPs and Tessas they replace. The limit of pounds 1,000 in cash invested is quite severe considering than many people will take their money in and out. They may be tempted to invest in equities on a short-term basis which could be dangerous.
"One must wonder why anyone not attracted to save under current tax-friendly options should be willing to do so under this scheme."
Dr Madsen Pirie head of the Adam Smith Institute said: "The Government has fallen hook, line and sinker for the Treasury line that tax foregone is a cost to the Exchequer. A future government will increase the ceiling four or fivefold straight away in order to provide a real incentive.
- 1 What happens to your body when you give up sugar?
- 2 Have sex with your iPad thanks to the new sex toy no-one asked for
- 3 The 'sex selfie stick' lets you FaceTime the inside of a vagina
- 4 Why you're almost certainly more like your father than your mother
- 5 Westboro Baptist Church couldn't picket Leonard Nimoy's funeral because they didn't know where it was
Durham Free School: 'Creationism taught at' free school facing closure
Nearly 100,000 of Britain's poorest children go hungry after parents' benefits are cut
End of the licence fee: BBC to back radical overhaul of how it is funded
Nigel Farage promises Ukip will not 'stigmatise' would-be migrants – and says he wants 'everyone to speak the same language'
Ex-head of MI6: 'We shouldn't kid ourselves that Russia is on a path to democracy'
Most people think legal tax avoidance is just as wrong as illegal tax evasion, poll suggests
iJobs Money & Business
£8 per hour: Recruitment Genius: This Pension Specialist was established early...
£30 - 35k + Bonus & Benefits: Guru Careers: We are seeking an Executive Assist...
£25000 - £30000 per annum + benefits: Ashdown Group: A global leader operating...
Voluntary post, reasonable expenses reimbursed: Reach Volunteering: Would you ...