Nadir sister's SFO case rejected
Thursday 11 July 1996
The case was struck out in the High Court on the grounds that the actions of the Metropolitan police officers concerned were the responsibility of their commissioner, not the SFO.
Mrs Navzat was arrested in connection with allegations - later withdrawn - that she was involved in a plot to bribe Mr Justice Tucker, the judge handling her brother's trial. Peter Krivinskas, Mrs Navzat's solicitor, said yesterday that an appeal against the decision to strike out the case had been lodged in the High Court on Tuesday.
He said: "It is important for the SFO to be held accountable for people working under its direction. If what they say is right, the SFO can never be held accountable for its actions. The law has not caught up with the creation of the SFO."
The case was struck out because existing legislation, which Mr Krivinskas said came into force before the SFO came into existence, states that only a chief constable or the Metropolitan Police Commissioner can be sued for his officers' actions.
But the officers who arrested Mrs Navzat were working for the SFO, where all the files on the case were kept. "They have the files in their building and the Metropolitan police have no files on it.
Mr Krivinskas confirmed that Mrs Navzat's total claim was likely to be in the region of pounds 1m. A parallel lawsuit against the Metropolitan Police for wrongful arrest and false imprisonment has not been ruled out.
Mr Krivinskas said that after the arrest Mrs Navzat had been questioned for two to three minutes about police inquiries into assets that Mr Nadir had supposedly been hiding from his trustees in bankruptcy. But the rest of the questioning was all about the bribery allegations, which was clearly the reason behind her detention.
The SFO made clear this week in its annual report that it had not dropped its intention to prosecute Mr Nadir if he "returned or is returned" to the jurisdiction from northern Cyprus.
In April, Elizabeth Forsyth, who worked for Mr Nadir, was jailed for five years after being found guilty on two counts of dishonestly handling stolen money from Polly Peck International.
- 1 East 17 bandmember Brian Harvey in 'very desperate situation’
- 2 Is this bridge haunted by the ghost of nu rave?
- 3 Woman filmed launching racist tirade against men on the Tube for speaking in 'own lingo'
- 4 The West has it totally wrong on Lee Kuan Yew
- 5 Scientists have discovered a simple way to cook rice that dramatically cuts the calories
East 17 bandmember Brian Harvey in 'very desperate situation’
Is this bridge haunted by the ghost of nu rave?
Woman filmed launching racist tirade against men on the Tube for speaking in 'own lingo'
Saudi Arabia says it won't rule out building nuclear weapons
Germanwings plane crash: Andreas Lubitz 'had eyesight problems' and woke from nightmares 'screaming we’re going down'
Ukip supporters are 55 or older, white and socially conservative, finds British Social Attitudes Report
JK Rowling responds to fan tweeting she 'can't see' Dumbledore being gay
Jeremy Clarkson sacked live: Alan Yentob 'wouldn't rule out' ex Top Gear host's BBC return
David Cameron calls Labour 'hopeless, sneering socialists' while announcing 7-day NHS plans
Revealed: Putin's army of pro-Kremlin bloggers
The West has it totally wrong on Lee Kuan Yew
iJobs Money & Business
Negotiable: Recruitment Genius: To provide a prompt, friendly and efficient se...
Negotiable: Recruitment Genius: You will be the first point of contact for all...
£18000 - £24000 per annum + benefits: Ashdown Group: HR, Payroll & Benefits Of...
£35000 - £38000 per annum + benefits : Ashdown Group: A highly successful, int...