Nadir sister's SFO case rejected
Thursday 11 July 1996
Related articles
The case was struck out in the High Court on the grounds that the actions of the Metropolitan police officers concerned were the responsibility of their commissioner, not the SFO.
Mrs Navzat was arrested in connection with allegations - later withdrawn - that she was involved in a plot to bribe Mr Justice Tucker, the judge handling her brother's trial. Peter Krivinskas, Mrs Navzat's solicitor, said yesterday that an appeal against the decision to strike out the case had been lodged in the High Court on Tuesday.
He said: "It is important for the SFO to be held accountable for people working under its direction. If what they say is right, the SFO can never be held accountable for its actions. The law has not caught up with the creation of the SFO."
The case was struck out because existing legislation, which Mr Krivinskas said came into force before the SFO came into existence, states that only a chief constable or the Metropolitan Police Commissioner can be sued for his officers' actions.
But the officers who arrested Mrs Navzat were working for the SFO, where all the files on the case were kept. "They have the files in their building and the Metropolitan police have no files on it.
Mr Krivinskas confirmed that Mrs Navzat's total claim was likely to be in the region of pounds 1m. A parallel lawsuit against the Metropolitan Police for wrongful arrest and false imprisonment has not been ruled out.
Mr Krivinskas said that after the arrest Mrs Navzat had been questioned for two to three minutes about police inquiries into assets that Mr Nadir had supposedly been hiding from his trustees in bankruptcy. But the rest of the questioning was all about the bribery allegations, which was clearly the reason behind her detention.
The SFO made clear this week in its annual report that it had not dropped its intention to prosecute Mr Nadir if he "returned or is returned" to the jurisdiction from northern Cyprus.
In April, Elizabeth Forsyth, who worked for Mr Nadir, was jailed for five years after being found guilty on two counts of dishonestly handling stolen money from Polly Peck International.
- 1 Serena Williams apologises after comment that rape victim 'shouldn't have put herself in that position'
- 2 Disability campaigners celebrate 'victory' after government rethink over plans to make it more difficult to claim disability benefits
- 3 Bankers could face jail after report urges the Government to introduce new criminal offence for reckless management
- 4 Breaking the Silence: In the reality of occupation, there are no Palestinian civilians – only potential terrorists
- 5 We never knew Nigella Lawson - and we still don’t
How will you make today delicious?
Tell us how you plan to make today delicious and you could win a £50 M&S gift card.
Win a Nook® Simple Touch eReader
Find out how Nook® is supporting the Evening Standard's Get Reading campaign - and your chance to win one.
Free reading festival for families
Follow The Standard's campaign to get London's children reading - and experience this unique event at Trafalgar Square on 13 July.
Enter the latest Independent competitions
Win anything from gadgets to five-star holidays on our competitions and offers page.
Business videos from commercial thought leaders
Watch the best in the business world give their insights into the world of business.
iJobs Money & Business
FX Options Front Office Java / C# Developer
£500 - £600 per day: Orgtel: FX Options Front Office Java / C# Developer - Ba...
Project Manager - Front Office - Regulatory IT
£600 - £700 per day: Orgtel: Project Manager - Front Office - Regulatory IT C...
FATCA Project Manager
£600 - £750 per day: Orgtel: FATCA Project Manager - Banking - London - £600-...
Fidessa Analyst / PM - Banking - London - £600pd
£550 - £600 per day: Orgtel: Fidessa Analyst / PM - Banking - London - Up to £...
Day In a Page
Babies behind bars
Sonic youth: The high-pitched sound alarm
The art of living in small spaces
'Teaching bright children isn't rocket science'
Can technology lure us back to the high street?



Comments