But the company said last night that Mr Newmarch had not resigned specifically over the Stock Exchange inquiry into his share dealings. Prudential said Mr Newmarch offered his resignation because "he found that the current relationship between the UK retail financial services regulators and both himself and the company has become unacceptable to him and he feels he is being put in an unacceptable position with regard to his position as chief executive of Prudential Corporation".
The Pru's statement added that the company believed Mr Newmarch had acted properly in his share dealings.
Keith Bedell-Pearce, a fellow-director and one of the leading internal candidates to replace Mr Newmarch, said the Exchange's inquiry was the straw that broke the camel's back.
"The questions raised about the share options just added to his feeling that he was becoming increasingly beleaguered. He felt he was having to spend too much time dealing with the nitty-gritty of regulatory issues. He felt the industry as a whole was beleaguered and without friends."
Mr Newmarch has been the industry's most trenchant critic of the financial services regulatory regime and had refused to join the new Personal Investment Authority, set up to regulate the sale of financial services to the public. He argued for statutory regulation of the industry rather than the self-regulation represented by the PIA. A Pru spokesman said the board unanimously backed Mr Newmarch's stance on regulation and that the Pru still had no intention of joining the PIA.
Mr Newmarch, who spent his entire career with the Pru, was appointed chief executive in 1990 and was paid £834,068 last year. A spokesman said that any compensation was a matter for discussion but that Mr Newmarch's three-year rolling contract would not be relevant as he had resigned.
Brian Corby, the Pru's chairman, has taken over as chief executive.Reuse content